@misc{AichertStaigerSchulteMaeteretal.2010,
  author    = {Aichert, Ingrid and Staiger, Anja and Schulte-M{\"a}ter, Anne and Becker-Redding, Ulrike and Stahn, Corinna and Peschke, Claudia and Heide, Judith and Ott, Susan and Herrmann, Heike and V{\"o}lsch, Juliane and Mayer, J{\"o}rg and Rohnke, Lucie and Frank, Ulrike and Stadie, Nicole and Jentsch, Nadine and Blech, Anke and Kurtenbach, Stephanie and Thieke, Johanna and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Stahn, Corinna and H{\"o}rnig, Robin and Burchert, Frank and De Bleser, Ria and Heister, Julian and Bartels, Luise and W{\"u}rzner, Kay-Michael and B{\"o}hme, Romy and Burmester, Juliane and Krajewski, Melanie and Nager, Wido and Jungeh{\"u}lsing, Gerhard Jan and Wartenburger, Isabell and J{\"o}bges, Michael and Schwilling, Eleonore and Lidzba, Karen and Winkler, Susanne and Konietzko, Andreas and Kr{\"a}geloh-Mann, Ingeborg and Rilling, Eva and Wilken, Rainer and Wismann, Kathrin and Glandorf, Birte and Hoffmann, Hannah and Hinnenkamp, Christiane and Rohlmann, Insa and Ludewigt, Jacqueline and Bittner, Christian and Orlov, Tatjana and Claus, Katrin and Ehemann, Christine and Winnecken, Andreas and Hummel, Katja and Breitenstein, Sarah},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik = Schwerpunktthema: Von der Programmierung zur Artikulation : Sprechapraxie bei Kindern und Erwachsenen},
  number    = {3},
  editor    = {Wahl, Michael and Stahn, Corinna and Hanne, Sandra and Fritzsche, Tom},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  organization    = {Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e. V. (vpl)},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-079-3},
  issn      = {1869-3822},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-4578},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-45470},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Das 3. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik fand am 21. November 2009 an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam statt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband enth{\"a}lt die drei Hauptvortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema „Von der Programmierung zu Artikulation: Sprechapraxie bei Kindern und Erwachsenen". Dar{\"u}ber hinaus enth{\"a}lt der Band die Beitr{\"a}ge aus dem Spektrum Patholinguistik, sowie die Abstracts der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BurchertDeBleser2004,
  author    = {Burchert, Frank and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {Passives in agrammatic sentence comprehension : a German Study},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Background: A large number of studies examining agrammatic comprehension of canonical and non-canonical sentences in Broca's aphasia have focused on passives and results have been interpreted in theoretical frameworks such as the trace deletion hypothesis (TDH: Grodzinsky, 1995a). However, there are a number of unresolved issues associated with passives. The linguistic analysis of passive structures in different languages has remained controversial as well as the empirical neurolinguistic basis of agrammatic passive comprehension. In addition, a variety of morphological and semantic questions have been raised with respect to the implicit argument in short passives and the ordering of thematic roles reflected by different positions of the by-phrase in long passives. Aims: The major aims of the present study were to re-examine the analyses of passives with and without traces, the role of an implicit argument in short passives, and the influence of the position of the by-phrase on agrammatic sentence comprehension. Methods \& Procedures: A binary picture-sentence matching task was administered to six non-fluent German agrammatic speakers. Various types of passives including long, short, and topicalised passives were tested. Additionally, comprehension of active SVO sentences was assessed in a separate but similar session. Only those patients whose comprehension on active sentences was above chance were included. Outcomes \& Results: As a group, the six subjects performed above chance over all passive types. If only long canonical passives are considered, as is done in most studies, five subjects showed a pattern compatible with the TDH. However, the picture was modified if other passive constructions were taken into account, in which case only three of the six subjects showed TDH conformity. Conclusions: There is no unique pattern of agrammatic passive comprehension and only half of the agrammatic subjects conformed to the trace deletion hypothesis. Given the results on long canonical and topicalised passives, our data support linguistic analyses that assume a trace- based derivation of passives. Furthermore, the results are in line with linguistic analyses adopting an implicit argument in short passives. Since comprehension of topicalised passives with a canonical order of theta-roles was not better than that of long passives without a canonical order, the agrammatic problem with passives does not seem to hinge on semantics},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BurchertDeBleserSonntag2003,
  author    = {Burchert, Frank and De Bleser, Ria and Sonntag, Katharina},
  title     = {Does morphology make the difference? : Agrammatic sentence comprehension in German},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BurchertSwobodaMollDeBleser2005,
  author    = {Burchert, Frank and Swoboda-Moll, Maria and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {Tense and Agreement dissociations in German agrammatic speakers : Underspecification vs. hierarchy},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The aim of the present paper was to investigate whether German agrammatic production data are compatible with the Tree-Pruning-Hypothesis (TPH; Friedmann \& Grodzinsky, 1997). The theory predicts unidirectional patterns of dissociation in agrammatic production data with respect to Tense and Agreement. However, there was evidence of a double dissociation between Tense and Agreement in our data. The presence of a bidirectional dissociation is incompatible with any theory which assumes a hierarchical order between these categories such as the TPH or other versions thereof (such as Lee's, 2003 top-down hypothesis). It will be argued that the data can better be accounted for by relying on newer linguistic theories such as the Minimalist Program (MP, Chomsky, 2000), which does not assume a hierarchical order between independent syntactic Tense and Agreement nodes but treats them as different features (semantically interpretable vs. uninterpretable) under a single node. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BurchertSwobodaMollDeBleser2005,
  author    = {Burchert, Frank and Swoboda-Moll, Maria and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {The left periphery in agrammatic clausal representations : evidence from German},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {Recently, neurolinguistic explanations informed by linguistic theory have been proposed to account for spontaneous and elicited agrammatic speech production. These are either formulated in terms of impaired representations or they refer to impaired processing. Both have in common that they assume severe disorders of question production due to vulnerability of the left periphery of sentence structures in the representational account, of verb movement in the processing account. We report the results of question elicitation and spontaneous speech analysis in eight chronic German agrammatic speakers. The results indicate that there is not one homogeneous agrammatic pattern, but that the data reveal double dissociations which cannot be accounted for by the unitary explanations of agrammatism which are presently available. An alternative explanation will be provided which-in contrast to the representational account not only refers to global hierarchically organized nodes but relies on linguistic differences within these nodes. The assumption that they can be differentially affected in agrammatism can account for the observed patterns. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BurchertSwobodaMollDeBleser2004,
  author    = {Burchert, Frank and Swoboda-Moll, Maria and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {Tense and agreement in clausal representations : Evidence from German agrammatic aphasia},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BurchertWeldlichDeBleser2005,
  author    = {Burchert, Frank and Weldlich, C. and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {Focus in the left periphery : a cue to agrammatic sentence comprehension?},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CholewaDeBleser1995,
  author    = {Cholewa, J{\"u}rgen and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {St{\"o}rungen der lexikalisch-morphologischen Wortverrbeitung bei Aphasie : dissoziation zwischen Derivation, Komposition und Flexion},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{CholewaDeBleser1996,
  author    = {Cholewa, J{\"u}rgen and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {Further neurolinguistics evidence for morphological fractionation within the lexical system},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CholewaDeBleserTabatabaieetal.1994,
  author    = {Cholewa, J{\"u}rgen and De Bleser, Ria and Tabatabaie, Sia and Stadie, Nicole},
  title     = {Das Programm PHONO : computergest{\"u}tzte Analyse expressiv-phonologischer Fehlleistungen},
  issn      = {0933-2715},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {de}
}