@misc{MoserMuellerTschakertetal.2017,
  author    = {Moser, Othmar and Mueller, Alexander and Tschakert, Gerhard and Koehler, Gerd and Lawrence, Jimmy B. and Groeschl, Werner and Pieber, Thomas R. and Bracken, Richard M. and Hofmann, Peter},
  title     = {Exercise Prescription in Type 1 Diabetes: Should We Use Percentages of Maximum Heart Rate?},
  series = {Medicine and science in sports and exercise : official journal of the American College of Sports Medicine},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Medicine and science in sports and exercise : official journal of the American College of Sports Medicine},
  publisher = {Lippincott Williams \& Wilkins},
  address   = {Philadelphia},
  issn      = {0195-9131},
  doi       = {10.1249/01.mss.0000519798.35679.cf},
  pages     = {1020 -- 1020},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{MoserMaderTschakertetal.2017,
  author    = {Moser, Othmar and Mader, Julia K. and Tschakert, Gerhard and Mueller, Alexander and Groeschl, Werner and Pieber, Thomas R. and Koehler, Gerd and Messerschmidt, Janin and Hofmann, Peter},
  title     = {Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) during continuous and high-intensity interval exercise in patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-400470},
  pages     = {15},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Continuous exercise (CON) and high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) can be safely performed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Additionally, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems may serve as a tool to reduce the risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia. It is unclear if CGM is accurate during CON and HIIE at different mean workloads. Seven T1DM patients performed CON and HIIE at 5\% below (L) and above (M) the first lactate turn point (LTP1), and 5\% below the second lactate turn point (LTP2) (H) on a cycle ergometer. Glucose was measured via CGM and in capillary blood (BG). Differences were found in comparison of CGM vs. BG in three out of the six tests (p < 0.05). In CON, bias and levels of agreement for L, M, and H were found at: 0.85 (-3.44, 5.15) mmol·L-1, -0.45 (-3.95, 3.05) mmol·L-1, -0.31 (-8.83, 8.20) mmol·L-1 and at 1.17 (-2.06, 4.40) mmol·L-1, 0.11 (-5.79, 6.01) mmol·L-1, 1.48 (-2.60, 5.57) mmol·L-1 in HIIE for the same intensities. Clinically-acceptable results (except for CON H) were found. CGM estimated BG to be clinically acceptable, except for CON H. Additionally, using CGM may increase avoidance of exercise-induced hypoglycemia, but usual BG control should be performed during intense exercise.},
  language  = {en}
}