@phdthesis{Vogel2013,
  author    = {Vogel, Kristin},
  title     = {Applications of Bayesian networks in natural hazard assessments},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-69777},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Even though quite different in occurrence and consequences, from a modeling perspective many natural hazards share similar properties and challenges. Their complex nature as well as lacking knowledge about their driving forces and potential effects make their analysis demanding: uncertainty about the modeling framework, inaccurate or incomplete event observations and the intrinsic randomness of the natural phenomenon add up to different interacting layers of uncertainty, which require a careful handling. Nevertheless deterministic approaches are still widely used in natural hazard assessments, holding the risk of underestimating the hazard with disastrous effects. The all-round probabilistic framework of Bayesian networks constitutes an attractive alternative. In contrast to deterministic proceedings, it treats response variables as well as explanatory variables as random variables making no difference between input and output variables. Using a graphical representation Bayesian networks encode the dependency relations between the variables in a directed acyclic graph: variables are represented as nodes and (in-)dependencies between variables as (missing) edges between the nodes. The joint distribution of all variables can thus be described by decomposing it, according to the depicted independences, into a product of local conditional probability distributions, which are defined by the parameters of the Bayesian network. In the framework of this thesis the Bayesian network approach is applied to different natural hazard domains (i.e. seismic hazard, flood damage and landslide assessments). Learning the network structure and parameters from data, Bayesian networks reveal relevant dependency relations between the included variables and help to gain knowledge about the underlying processes. The problem of Bayesian network learning is cast in a Bayesian framework, considering the network structure and parameters as random variables itself and searching for the most likely combination of both, which corresponds to the maximum a posteriori (MAP score) of their joint distribution given the observed data. Although well studied in theory the learning of Bayesian networks based on real-world data is usually not straight forward and requires an adoption of existing algorithms. Typically arising problems are the handling of continuous variables, incomplete observations and the interaction of both. Working with continuous distributions requires assumptions about the allowed families of distributions. To "let the data speak" and avoid wrong assumptions, continuous variables are instead discretized here, thus allowing for a completely data-driven and distribution-free learning. An extension of the MAP score, considering the discretization as random variable as well, is developed for an automatic multivariate discretization, that takes interactions between the variables into account. The discretization process is nested into the network learning and requires several iterations. Having to face incomplete observations on top, this may pose a computational burden. Iterative proceedings for missing value estimation become quickly infeasible. A more efficient albeit approximate method is used instead, estimating the missing values based only on the observations of variables directly interacting with the missing variable. Moreover natural hazard assessments often have a primary interest in a certain target variable. The discretization learned for this variable does not always have the required resolution for a good prediction performance. Finer resolutions for (conditional) continuous distributions are achieved with continuous approximations subsequent to the Bayesian network learning, using kernel density estimations or mixtures of truncated exponential functions. All our proceedings are completely data-driven. We thus avoid assumptions that require expert knowledge and instead provide domain independent solutions, that are applicable not only in other natural hazard assessments, but in a variety of domains struggling with uncertainties.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelRiggelsenKorupetal.2014,
  author    = {Vogel, Kristin and Riggelsen, Carsten and Korup, Oliver and Scherbaum, Frank},
  title     = {Bayesian network learning for natural hazard analyses},
  series = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Copernicus},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1561-8633},
  doi       = {10.5194/nhess-14-2605-2014},
  pages     = {2605 -- 2626},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Modern natural hazards research requires dealing with several uncertainties that arise from limited process knowledge, measurement errors, censored and incomplete observations, and the intrinsic randomness of the governing processes. Nevertheless, deterministic analyses are still widely used in quantitative hazard assessments despite the pitfall of misestimating the hazard and any ensuing risks. In this paper we show that Bayesian networks offer a flexible framework for capturing and expressing a broad range of uncertainties encountered in natural hazard assessments. Although Bayesian networks are well studied in theory, their application to real-world data is far from straightforward, and requires specific tailoring and adaptation of existing algorithms. We offer suggestions as how to tackle frequently arising problems in this context and mainly concentrate on the handling of continuous variables, incomplete data sets, and the interaction of both. By way of three case studies from earthquake, flood, and landslide research, we demonstrate the method of data-driven Bayesian network learning, and showcase the flexibility, applicability, and benefits of this approach. Our results offer fresh and partly counterintuitive insights into well-studied multivariate problems of earthquake-induced ground motion prediction, accurate flood damage quantification, and spatially explicit landslide prediction at the regional scale. In particular, we highlight how Bayesian networks help to express information flow and independence assumptions between candidate predictors. Such knowledge is pivotal in providing scientists and decision makers with well-informed strategies for selecting adequate predictor variables for quantitative natural hazard assessments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{LaudanRoezerSiegetal.2017,
  author    = {Laudan, Jonas and R{\"o}zer, Viktor and Sieg, Tobias and Vogel, Kristin and Thieken, Annegret},
  title     = {Damage assessment in Braunsbach 2016},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {653},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-41839},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-418392},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Flash floods are caused by intense rainfall events and represent an insufficiently understood phenomenon in Germany. As a result of higher precipitation intensities, flash floods might occur more frequently in future. In combination with changing land use patterns and urbanisation, damage mitigation, insurance and risk management in flash-flood-prone regions are becoming increasingly important. However, a better understanding of damage caused by flash floods requires ex post collection of relevant but yet sparsely available information for research. At the end of May 2016, very high and concentrated rainfall intensities led to severe flash floods in several southern German municipalities. The small town of Braunsbach stood as a prime example of the devastating potential of such events. Eight to ten days after the flash flood event, damage assessment and data collection were conducted in Braunsbach by investigating all affected buildings and their surroundings. To record and store the data on site, the open-source software bundle KoBoCollect was used as an efficient and easy way to gather information. Since the damage driving factors of flash floods are expected to differ from those of riverine flooding, a post-hoc data analysis was performed, aiming to identify the influence of flood processes and building attributes on damage grades, which reflect the extent of structural damage. Data analyses include the application of random forest, a random general linear model and multinomial logistic regression as well as the construction of a local impact map to reveal influences on the damage grades. Further, a Spearman's Rho correlation matrix was calculated. The results reveal that the damage driving factors of flash floods differ from those of riverine floods to a certain extent. The exposition of a building in flow direction shows an especially strong correlation with the damage grade and has a high predictive power within the constructed damage models. Additionally, the results suggest that building materials as well as various building aspects, such as the existence of a shop window and the surroundings, might have an effect on the resulting damage. To verify and confirm the outcomes as well as to support future mitigation strategies, risk management and planning, more comprehensive and systematic data collection is necessary.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LaudanRoezerSiegetal.2017,
  author    = {Laudan, Jonas and Roezer, Viktor and Sieg, Tobias and Vogel, Kristin and Thieken, Annegret},
  title     = {Damage assessment in Braunsbach 2016: data collection and analysis for an improved understanding of damaging processes during flash floods},
  series = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences},
  publisher = {Copernicus},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1561-8633},
  doi       = {10.5194/nhess-17-2163-2017},
  pages     = {2163 -- 2179},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{AgarwalBoessenkoolFischeretal.2016,
  author    = {Agarwal, Ankit and Boessenkool, Berry and Fischer, Madlen and Hahn, Irene and K{\"o}hn, Lisei and Laudan, Jonas and Moran, Thomas and {\"O}zt{\"u}rk, Ugur and Riemer, Adrian and R{\"o}zer, Viktor and Sieg, Tobias and Vogel, Kristin and Wendi, Dadiyorto and Bronstert, Axel and Thieken, Annegret},
  title     = {Die Sturzflut in Braunsbach, Mai 2016},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-394881},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Im Graduiertenkolleg NatRiskChange der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam und anderen Forschungseinrichtungen werden beobachtete sowie zuk{\"u}nftig m{\"o}gliche Ver{\"a}nderungen von Naturgefahren untersucht. Teil des strukturierten Doktorandenprogramms sind sogenannte Task-Force-Eins{\"a}tze, bei denen die Promovierende zeitlich begrenzt ein aktuelles Ereignis auswerten. Im Zuge dieser Aktivit{\"a}t wurde die Sturzflut vom 29.05.2016 in Braunsbach (Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg) untersucht. In diesem Bericht werden erste Auswertungen zur Einordnung der Niederschl{\"a}ge, zu den hydrologischen und geomorphologischen Prozessen im Einzugsgebiet des Orlacher Bachs sowie zu den verursachten Sch{\"a}den beleuchtet. Die Region war Zentrum extremer Regenf{\"a}lle in der Gr{\"o}ßenordnung von 100 mm innerhalb von 2 Stunden. Das 6 km² kleine Einzugsgebiet hat eine sehr schnelle Reaktionszeit, zumal bei vorges{\"a}ttigtem Boden. Im steilen Bachtal haben mehrere kleinere und gr{\"o}ßere Hangrutschungen {\"u}ber 8000 m³ Ger{\"o}ll, Schutt und Schwemmholz in das Gew{\"a}sser eingetragen und m{\"o}glicherweise kurzzeitige Aufstauungen und Durchbr{\"u}che verursacht. Neben den großen Wassermengen mit einer Abflussspitze in einer Gr{\"o}ßenordnung von 100 m³/s hat gerade die Geschiebefracht zu großen Sch{\"a}den an den Geb{\"a}uden entlang des Bachlaufs in Braunsbach gef{\"u}hrt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VogelOzturkRiemeretal.2017,
  author    = {Vogel, Kristin and Ozturk, Ugur and Riemer, Adrian and Laudan, Jonas and Sieg, Tobias and Wendi, Dadiyorto and Agarwal, Ankit and Roezer, Viktor and Korup, Oliver and Thieken, Annegret},
  title     = {Die Sturzflut von Braunsbach am 29. Mai 2016 - Entstehung, Ablauf und Sch{\"a}den eines „Jahrhundertereignisses"},
  series = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Bundesanst. f{\"u}r Gew{\"a}sserkunde},
  address   = {Koblenz},
  issn      = {1439-1783},
  doi       = {10.5675/HyWa_2017,3_2},
  pages     = {163 -- 175},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Am Abend des 29. Mai 2016 wurde der Ort Braunsbach im Landkreis Schw{\"a}bisch-Hall (Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg) von einer Sturzflut getroffen, bei der mehrere H{\"a}user stark besch{\"a}digt oder zerst{\"o}rt wurden. Die Sturzflut war eine der Unwetterfolgen, die im Fr{\"u}hsommer 2016 vom Tiefdruckgebiet Elvira ausgel{\"o}st wurden. Der vorliegende Bericht ist der zweite Teil einer Doppelver{\"o}ffentlichung, welche die Ergebnisse zur Untersuchung des Sturzflutereignisses im Rahmen des DFG-Graduiertenkollegs "Naturgefahren und Risiken in einer sich ver{\"a}ndernden Welt" (NatRiskChange, GRK 2043/1) der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam pr{\"a}sentiert. W{\"a}hrend Teil 1 die meteorologischen und hydrologischen Ereignisse analysiert, fokussiert Teil 2 auf die geomorphologischen Prozesse und die verursachten Geb{\"a}udesch{\"a}den. Dazu wurden Ursprung und Ausmaß des w{\"a}hrend des Sturzflutereignisses mobilisierten und in den Ort getragenen Materials untersucht. Des Weiteren wurden zu 96 betroffenen Geb{\"a}uden Daten zum Schadensgrad sowie Prozess- und Geb{\"a}udecharakteristika aufgenommen und ausgewertet. Die Untersuchungen zeigen, dass bei der Betrachtung von Hochwassergef{\"a}hrdung die Ber{\"u}cksichtigung von Sturzfluten und ihrer speziellen Charakteristika, wie hoher Feststofftransport und sprunghaftes Verhalten insbesondere in bebautem Gel{\"a}nde, wesentlich ist, um effektive Schutzmaßnahmen ergreifen zu k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EsfahaniVogelCottonetal.2021,
  author    = {Esfahani, Reza Dokht Dolatabadi and Vogel, Kristin and Cotton, Fabrice and Ohrnberger, Matthias and Scherbaum, Frank and Kriegerowski, Marius},
  title     = {Exploring the dimensionality of ground-motion data by applying autoencoder techniques},
  series = {Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America : BSSA},
  volume    = {111},
  journal   = {Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America : BSSA},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Seismological Society of America},
  address   = {El Cerito, Calif.},
  issn      = {0037-1106},
  doi       = {10.1785/0120200285},
  pages     = {1563 -- 1576},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this article, we address the question of how observed ground-motion data can most effectively be modeled for engineering seismological purposes. Toward this goal, we use a data-driven method, based on a deep-learning autoencoder with a variable number of nodes in the bottleneck layer, to determine how many parameters are needed to reconstruct synthetic and observed ground-motion data in terms of their median values and scatter. The reconstruction error as a function of the number of nodes in the bottleneck is used as an indicator of the underlying dimensionality of ground-motion data, that is, the minimum number of predictor variables needed in a ground-motion model. Two synthetic and one observed datasets are studied to prove the performance of the proposed method. We find that mapping ground-motion data to a 2D manifold primarily captures magnitude and distance information and is suited for an approximate data reconstruction. The data reconstruction improves with an increasing number of bottleneck nodes of up to three and four, but it saturates if more nodes are added to the bottleneck.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{BronstertCrisologoHeistermannetal.2020,
  author    = {Bronstert, Axel and Crisologo, Irene and Heistermann, Maik and {\"O}zt{\"u}rk, Ugur and Vogel, Kristin and Wendi, Dadiyorto},
  title     = {Flash-floods: more often, more severe, more damaging?},
  series = {Climate change, hazards and adaptation options: handling the impacts of a changing climate},
  booktitle = {Climate change, hazards and adaptation options: handling the impacts of a changing climate},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-37425-9},
  issn      = {1610-2010},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-37425-9_12},
  pages     = {225 -- 244},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In recent years, urban and rural flash floods in Europe and abroad have gained considerable attention because of their sudden occurrence, severe material damages and even danger to life of inhabitants. This contribution addresses questions about possibly changing environmental conditions which might have altered the occurrence frequencies of such events and their consequences. We analyze the following major fields of environmental changes. Altered high intensity rain storm conditions, as a consequence of regionalwarming; Possibly altered runoff generation conditions in response to high intensity rainfall events; Possibly altered runoff concentration conditions in response to the usage and management of the landscape, such as agricultural, forest practices or rural roads; Effects of engineering measures in the catchment, such as retention basins, check dams, culverts, or river and geomorphological engineering measures. We take the flash-flood in Braunsbach, SW-Germany, as an example, where a particularly concise flash flood event occurred at the end of May 2016. This extreme cascading natural event led to immense damage in this particular village. The event is retrospectively analyzed with regard to meteorology, hydrology, geomorphology and damage to obtain a quantitative assessment of the processes and their development. The results show that it was a very rare rainfall event with extreme intensities, which in combination with catchment properties and altered environmental conditions led to extreme runoff, extreme debris flow and immense damages. Due to the complex and interacting processes, no single flood cause can be identified, since only the interplay of those led to such an event. We have shown that environmental changes are important, but-at least for this case study-even natural weather and hydrologic conditions would still have resulted in an extreme flash flood event.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchroeterKreibichVogeletal.2014,
  author    = {Schroeter, Kai and Kreibich, Heidi and Vogel, Kristin and Riggelsen, Carsten and Scherbaum, Frank and Merz, Bruno},
  title     = {How useful are complex flood damage models?},
  series = {Water resources research},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Water resources research},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {American Geophysical Union},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0043-1397},
  doi       = {10.1002/2013WR014396},
  pages     = {3378 -- 3395},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {We investigate the usefulness of complex flood damage models for predicting relative damage to residential buildings in a spatial and temporal transfer context. We apply eight different flood damage models to predict relative building damage for five historic flood events in two different regions of Germany. Model complexity is measured in terms of the number of explanatory variables which varies from 1 variable up to 10 variables which are singled out from 28 candidate variables. Model validation is based on empirical damage data, whereas observation uncertainty is taken into consideration. The comparison of model predictive performance shows that additional explanatory variables besides the water depth improve the predictive capability in a spatial and temporal transfer context, i.e., when the models are transferred to different regions and different flood events. Concerning the trade-off between predictive capability and reliability the model structure seem more important than the number of explanatory variables. Among the models considered, the reliability of Bayesian network-based predictions in space-time transfer is larger than for the remaining models, and the uncertainties associated with damage predictions are reflected more completely.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelWeiseSchroeteretal.2018,
  author    = {Vogel, Kristin and Weise, Laura and Schr{\"o}ter, Kai and Thieken, Annegret},
  title     = {Identifying Driving Factors in Flood-Damaging Processes Using Graphical Models},
  series = {Water resources research},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {Water resources research},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {American Geophysical Union},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0043-1397},
  doi       = {10.1029/2018WR022858},
  pages     = {8864 -- 8889},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Flood damage estimation is a core task in flood risk assessments and requires reliable flood loss models. Identifying the driving factors of flood loss at residential buildings and gaining insight into their relations is important to improve our understanding of flood damage processes. For that purpose, we learn probabilistic graphical models, which capture and illustrate (in-)dependencies between the considered variables. The models are learned based on postevent surveys with flood-affected residents after six flood events, which occurred in Germany between 2002 and 2013. Besides the sustained building damage, the survey data contain information about flooding parameters, early warning and emergency measures, property-level mitigation measures and preparedness, socioeconomic characteristics of the household, and building characteristics. The analysis considers the entire data set with a total of 4,468 cases as well as subsets of the data set partitioned into single flood events and flood types: river floods, levee breaches, surface water flooding, and groundwater floods, to reveal differences in the damaging processes. The learned networks suggest that the flood loss ratio of residential buildings is directly influenced by hydrological and hydraulic aspects as well as by building characteristics and property-level mitigation measures. The study demonstrates also that for different flood events and process types the building damage is influenced by varying factors. This suggests that flood damage models need to be capable of reproducing these differences for spatial and temporal model transfers.},
  language  = {en}
}