@article{BestSchroederHerbert2006,
  author    = {Best, Wendy and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Herbert, Ruth},
  title     = {An investigation of a relative impairment in naming non-living items : theoretical and methodological implications},
  issn      = {0911-6044},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.09.001},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {This paper presents a study of PH, a woman with aphasia, who shows a robust impairment in naming pictures of non-living relative to living things. Un-timed investigations of feature knowledge show similar performance across categories suggesting that, as in previous studies, the category effect may be arising at a post-semantic level. However, her performance on a timed feature verification task was slower for non-living than living things (relative to matched controls), in line with her naming. This suggests that the source of PH's category deficit is in fact semantic and that thorough investigation is necessary before claiming a post-semantic category specific deficit in word production. Finally, the results of an intervention study, which apparently eliminated the effect of semantic category on PH's naming, are reported.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchroederStadie2003,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Stadie, Nicole},
  title     = {Analyse des buchstabierenden Lesens bei Entwicklungsdyslexie},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Lesefehler eines 10j{\"a}hrigen Jungen (OL) mit Entwicklungsdyslexie, der bei seinen Leseversuchen ausschließlich eine buchstabierende Lesestrategie anwendete. OL zeigte eine starke Beeintr{\"a}chtigung in der Entwicklung sowohl der lexikalischen und als auch der nichtlexikalischen Leseroute. Im Rahmen einer detaillierten Fehlerklassifikation wurden die Fehler beim nichtlexikalischen Lesen auf einzelne Subkomponenten der nichtlexikalischen Leseroute, des Parsers, Translators und Blenders (Temple, 1985) {\"u}bertragen. Die Mehrheit der Lesefehler von OL tauchte auf der Ebene des Blenders auf. Auslassungen vorher bereits benannter Grapheme stellten den h{\"a}ufigsten Fehlertyp dar. Die Beeintr{\"a}chtigung in der Entwicklung der Blendingf{\"a}higkeiten wird daher als haupts{\"a}chliche Ursache f{\"u}r OLs Unf{\"a}higkeit, eine nichtlexikalische Verarbeitungsstrategie aufzubauen, angesehen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schroeder2017,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Astrid},
  title     = {Diagnostik und Therapie von Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten in der integrativen Lerntherapie},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik (Band 10)- Schwerpunktthema: Panorama Patholinguistik: Sprachwissenschaft trifft Sprachtherapie},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik (Band 10)- Schwerpunktthema: Panorama Patholinguistik: Sprachwissenschaft trifft Sprachtherapie},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-9085},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-405050},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schroeder2013,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Astrid},
  title     = {Diagnostik und Therapie von syntaktischen St{\"o}rungen bei Aphasie},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  editor    = {Fritzsche, Tom and Meyer, Corinna B. and Adelt, Anne and Roß, Jennifer},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-68484},
  pages     = {87 -- 98},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {1 Einleitung 2 Modell der Satzverarbeitung 3 St{\"o}rungen des Satzverst{\"a}ndnisses 4 St{\"o}rungen der Satzproduktion 5 Zusammenfassung und Ausblick 6 Dank 7 Literatur},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchroederStadiePostleretal.2005,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Stadie, Nicole and Postler, Jenny and Lorenz, Antje and Swoboda-Moll, Maria and Burchert, Frank and De Bleser, Ria},
  title     = {Does training-induced improvement of noncanonical sentence production in agrammatic aphasia generalize to comprehension? : a multiple single case study},
  issn      = {0093-934X},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ThiekeSchroederStadie2010,
  author    = {Thieke, Johanna and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Stadie, Nicole},
  title     = {Einfluss semantischer Komplexit{\"a}t bei der Behandlung von Wortfindungsst{\"o}rungen},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-9085},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47018},
  pages     = {147 -- 150},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ThiekeSchroederStadie2010,
  author    = {Thieke, Johanna and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Stadie, Nicole},
  title     = {Einfluss semantischer Komplexit{\"a}t bei der Behandlung von Wortfindungsst{\"o}rungen : eine Einzelfallstudie},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{StadieSchroeder2012,
  author    = {Stadie, Nicole and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid},
  title     = {Forschungsbasiertes Vorgehen im klinischen Alltag : Werkzeuge f{\"u}r die Planung, Durchf{\"u}hrung und Evaluation von Sprachtherapie},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62529},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {1 Einleitung 2 Hintergrund 3 Ziel 4 Methode: Protokollb{\"o}gen 5 Ausblick 6 Literatur},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{RaelingHanneSchroederetal.2016,
  author    = {R{\"a}ling, Romy and Hanne, Sandra and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Keßler, Carla and Wartenburger, Isabell},
  title     = {Judging the animacy of words},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-98402},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The age at which members of a semantic category are learned (age of acquisition), the typicality they demonstrate within their corresponding category, and the semantic domain to which they belong (living, non-living) are known to influence the speed and accuracy of lexical/semantic processing. So far, only a few studies have looked at the origin of age of acquisition and its interdependence with typicality and semantic domain within the same experimental design. Twenty adult participants performed an animacy decision task in which nouns were classified according to their semantic domain as being living or non-living. Response times were influenced by the independent main effects of each parameter: typicality, age of acquisition, semantic domain, and frequency. However, there were no interactions. The results are discussed with respect to recent models concerning the origin of age of acquisition effects.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RaelingHanneSchroederetal.2017,
  author    = {R{\"a}ling, Romy and Hanne, Sandra and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Keßler, Carla and Wartenburger, Isabell},
  title     = {Judging the animacy of words},
  series = {Quarterly journal of experimental psychology},
  volume    = {70},
  journal   = {Quarterly journal of experimental psychology},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1747-0218},
  doi       = {10.1080/17470218.2016.1223704},
  pages     = {2094 -- 2104},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The age at which members of a semantic category are learned (age of acquisition), the typicality they demonstrate within their corresponding category, and the semantic domain to which they belong (living, non-living) are known to influence the speed and accuracy of lexical/semantic processing. So far, only a few studies have looked at the origin of age of acquisition and its interdependence with typicality and semantic domain within the same experimental design. Twenty adult participants performed an animacy decision task in which nouns were classified according to their semantic domain as being living or non-living. Response times were influenced by the independent main effects of each parameter: typicality, age of acquisition, semantic domain, and frequency. However, there were no interactions. The results are discussed with respect to recent models concerning the origin of age of acquisition effects.},
  language  = {en}
}