@misc{Galetzka2017,
  author    = {Galetzka, Cedric},
  title     = {Commentary on: Radesky, Jenny S.; Schumacher, Jayna ; Zuckerman, Barry: Mobile and interactive media use by young children: the good, the bad, and the unknown. - Pediatrics. - 135 (2015), 1, S. 1 - 3. - doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2251},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00461},
  pages     = {3},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Galetzka2018,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Galetzka, Cedric},
  title     = {Reward and prediction errors in Bayesian sensorimotor control},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-50350},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-503507},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {53},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Midbrain dopamine neurons invigorate responses by signaling opportunity costs (tonic dopamine) and promote associative learning by encoding a reward prediction error signal (phasic dopamine). Recent studies on Bayesian sensorimotor control have implicated midbrain dopamine concentration in the integration of prior knowledge and current sensory information. The present behavioral study addressed the contributions of tonic and phasic dopamine in a Bayesian decision-making task by alternating reward magnitude and inferring reward prediction errors. Twenty-four participants were asked to indicate the position of a hidden target stimulus under varying prior and likelihood uncertainty. Trial-by-trial rewards were allocated based on performance and two different reward maxima. Overall, participants' behavior agreed with Bayesian decision theory, but indicated excessive reliance on likelihood information. These results thus oppose accounts of statistically optimal integration in sensorimotor control, and suggest that the sensorimotor system is subject to additional decision heuristics. Moreover, higher reward magnitude was not observed to induce enhanced response vigor, and was associated with less Bayes-like integration. In addition, the weighting of prior knowledge and current sensory information proceeded independently of reward prediction errors. Taken together, these findings suggest that the process of combining prior and likelihood uncertainties in sensorimotor control is largely robust to variations in reward.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Galetzka2017,
  author    = {Galetzka, Cedric},
  title     = {The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01315},
  pages     = {1 -- 5},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Meaning-making in the brain has become one of the most intensely discussed topics in cognitive science. Traditional theories on cognition that emphasize abstract symbol manipulations often face a dead end: The symbol grounding problem. The embodiment idea tries to overcome this barrier by assuming that the mind is grounded in sensorimotor experiences. A recent surge in behavioral and brain-imaging studies has therefore focused on the role of the motor cortex in language processing. Concrete, action-related words have received convincing evidence to rely on sensorimotor activation. Abstract concepts, however, still pose a distinct challenge for embodied theories on cognition. Fully embodied abstraction mechanisms were formulated but sensorimotor activation alone seems unlikely to close the explanatory gap. In this respect, the idea of integration areas, such as convergence zones or the 'hub and spoke' model, do not only appear like the most promising candidates to account for the discrepancies between concrete and abstract concepts but could also help to unite the field of cognitive science again. The current review identifies milestones in cognitive science research and recent achievements that highlight fundamental challenges, key questions and directions for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Galetzka2017,
  author    = {Galetzka, Cedric},
  title     = {The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-400563},
  pages     = {5},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Meaning-making in the brain has become one of the most intensely discussed topics in cognitive science. Traditional theories on cognition that emphasize abstract symbol manipulations often face a dead end: The symbol grounding problem. The embodiment idea tries to overcome this barrier by assuming that the mind is grounded in sensorimotor experiences. A recent surge in behavioral and brain-imaging studies has therefore focused on the role of the motor cortex in language processing. Concrete, action-related words have received convincing evidence to rely on sensorimotor activation. Abstract concepts, however, still pose a distinct challenge for embodied theories on cognition. Fully embodied abstraction mechanisms were formulated but sensorimotor activation alone seems unlikely to close the explanatory gap. In this respect, the idea of integration areas, such as convergence zones or the 'hub and spoke' model, do not only appear like the most promising candidates to account for the discrepancies between concrete and abstract concepts but could also help to unite the field of cognitive science again. The current review identifies milestones in cognitive science research and recent achievements that highlight fundamental challenges, key questions and directions for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Galetzka2017,
  author    = {Galetzka, Cedric},
  title     = {The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01315},
  pages     = {1518 -- 1537},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Galetzka2017,
  author    = {Galetzka, Cedric},
  title     = {The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making (vol 8, 1315, 2017)},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01813},
  pages     = {1},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}