@article{StaubitzSerthThomasetal.2023, author = {Staubitz, Thomas and Serth, Sebastian and Thomas, Max and Ebner, Martin and Koschutnig-Ebner, Markus and Rampelt, Florian and von Stetten, Alexander and Wittke, Andreas}, title = {A metastandard for the international exchange of MOOCs}, series = {EMOOCs 2023 : Post-Covid Prospects for Massive Open Online Courses - Boost or Backlash?}, journal = {EMOOCs 2023 : Post-Covid Prospects for Massive Open Online Courses - Boost or Backlash?}, editor = {Meinel, Christoph and Schweiger, Stefanie and Staubitz, Thomas and Conrad, Robert and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Ebner, Martin and Sancassani, Susanna and Żur, Agnieszka and Friedl, Christian and Halawa, Sherif and Gamage, Dilrukshi and Scott, Jeffrey and Kristine Jonson Carlon, May and Deville, Yves and Gaebel, Michael and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and von Schmieden, Karen}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-62415}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-624154}, pages = {147 -- 161}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The MOOChub is a joined web-based catalog of all relevant German and Austrian MOOC platforms that lists well over 750 Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Automatically building such a catalog requires that all partners describe and publicly offer the metadata of their courses in the same way. The paper at hand presents the genesis of the idea to establish a common metadata standard and the story of its subsequent development. The result of this effort is, first, an open-licensed de-facto-standard, which is based on existing commonly used standards and second, a first prototypical platform that is using this standard: the MOOChub, which lists all courses of the involved partners. This catalog is searchable and provides a more comprehensive overview of basically all MOOCs that are offered by German and Austrian MOOC platforms. Finally, the upcoming developments to further optimize the catalog and the metadata standard are reported.}, language = {en} } @article{SteinbeckMeinel2023, author = {Steinbeck, Hendrik and Meinel, Christoph}, title = {What makes an educational video?}, series = {EMOOCs 2023 : Post-Covid Prospects for Massive Open Online Courses - Boost or Backlash?}, journal = {EMOOCs 2023 : Post-Covid Prospects for Massive Open Online Courses - Boost or Backlash?}, editor = {Meinel, Christoph and Schweiger, Stefanie and Staubitz, Thomas and Conrad, Robert and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Ebner, Martin and Sancassani, Susanna and Żur, Agnieszka and Friedl, Christian and Halawa, Sherif and Gamage, Dilrukshi and Scott, Jeffrey and Kristine Jonson Carlon, May and Deville, Yves and Gaebel, Michael and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and von Schmieden, Karen}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-62208}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-622086}, pages = {47 -- 58}, year = {2023}, abstract = {In an effort to describe and produce different formats for video instruction, the research community in technology-enhanced learning, and MOOC scholars in particular, have focused on the general style of video production: whether it is a digitally scripted "talk-and-chalk" or a "talking head" version of a learning unit. Since these production styles include various sub-elements, this paper deconstructs the inherited elements of video production in the context of educational live-streams. Using over 700 videos - both from synchronous and asynchronous modalities of large video-based platforms (YouTube and Twitch), 92 features were found in eight categories of video production. These include commonly analyzed features such as the use of green screen and a visible instructor, but also less studied features such as social media connections and changing camera perspective depending on the topic being covered. Overall, the research results enable an analysis of common video production styles and a toolbox for categorizing new formats - independent of their final (a)synchronous use in MOOCs. Keywords: video production, MOOC video styles, live-streaming.}, language = {en} } @article{Kruse2023, author = {Kruse, Julia}, title = {Entwicklung und Durchf{\"u}hrung eines Seminars zur F{\"o}rderung der Diagnosekompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden der Grundschulp{\"a}dagogik Deutsch im Bereich der Lesefl{\"u}ssigkeit}, series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, journal = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-568-2}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-61856}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-618562}, pages = {329 -- 342}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Die differenzierte und individuelle F{\"o}rderung der Lesefl{\"u}ssigkeit in heterogenen Gruppen erfordert ein hohes Maß an diagnostischer Kompetenz. Diese kann nicht allein durch die Vermittlung von Wissen gef{\"o}rdert werden, sondern muss zus{\"a}tzlich durch praxisnahe {\"U}bungen sukzessive ausgebildet werden. Um die Diagnosekompetenz von Masterstudierenden der Grundschulp{\"a}dagogik (Deutsch) an der Universit{\"a}t zu Potsdam zu f{\"o}rdern, wurde im Rahmen des Projekts PSI-Potsdam ein Seminar entwickelt und durchgef{\"u}hrt, das nach der Idee des Blended Learning mit digitalen {\"U}bungen angereichert ist und eine F{\"o}rderung der Diagnosekompetenz {\"u}ber einen l{\"a}ngeren Zeitraum gew{\"a}hrleisten soll. In dem Beitrag werden nach einer theoretischen Einf{\"u}hrung sowie einer Darlegung der Relevanz des Seminarkonzepts f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}fte der Primarstufe Deutsch die Entwicklung und Einbettung der {\"U}bungstools im Seminar dargestellt sowie deren praktischer Einsatz diskutiert.}, language = {de} } @article{RadkeEhlert2023, author = {Radke, Thea and Ehlert, Antje}, title = {Entwicklung und Einbindung eines „Online-Trainings der mathematischen Diagnosekompetenz" in Seminaren des Lehramtsstudiums f{\"u}r die Primarstufe}, series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, journal = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-568-2}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-61815}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-618159}, pages = {295 -- 307}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Zuk{\"u}nftige Lehrkr{\"a}fte auf den Umgang mit Heterogenit{\"a}t vorzubereiten, besonders im Primarschulbereich, ist ein Ziel der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung. Ein Ansatz dazu ist die F{\"o}rderung diagnostischer Kompetenzen von Studierenden. E-Learning-Angebote bieten hierzu angesichts der Individualisierung von Lernprozessen sowie der M{\"o}glichkeiten einer Integration in bereits bestehende Seminare viele Vorteile. Im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung wurde daher ein Online-Training entwickelt, das die mathematische Diagnosekompetenz von Studierenden st{\"a}rken soll. Das Training ist ein E-Learning-Angebot, das im Selbststudium durchlaufen werden kann und aus Lehrvideos, interaktiven Sch{\"u}ler:innenvideos und interaktiven {\"U}bungen besteht. An der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wurde das Training bisher in drei Seminaren des Lehramtsstudiums f{\"u}r die Primarstufe integriert und evaluiert. Aus der Evaluation mittels Frageb{\"o}gen ging hervor, dass von Studierenden und Lehrenden die Integration positiv bewertet wird.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{EsveldVriesBecchettietal.2023, author = {Esveld, Selma van and Vries, Nardo de and Becchetti, Sibilla and Dopper, Sofia and Valkenburg, Willem van and Carlon, May Kristine Jonson and Yokoi, Kensuke and Gayed, John Maurice and Suyama, Hiroshi and Cross, Jeffrey Scott and Jin, Tonje and Xue, Wei and Bruillard, {\´E}ric and Steinbeck, Hendrik and Meinel, Christoph and {\"O}zdemir, Paker Doğu and Can Bayer, Burak and Mercan, Duygu and Buyurucu, Gamze and Haugsbakken, Halvdan and Hagelia, Marianne and Ebner, Martin and Edelsbrunner, Sarah and Hohla-Sejkora, Katharina and Lipp, Silvia and Sch{\"o}n, Sandra and Xiaoxiao, Wang and Shuangshuang, Guo and Morales-Chan, Miguel and Amado-Salvatierra, H{\´e}ctor R. and Hern{\´a}ndez-Rizzardini, Rocael and Egloffstein, Marc and H{\"u}nemohr, Holger and Ifenthaler, Dirk and Dixon, Fred and Trabucchi, Stefania and Khaneboubi, Mehdi and Giannatelli, Ada and Tomasini, Alessandra and Staubitz, Thomas and Serth, Sebastian and Thomas, Max and Koschutnig-Ebner, Markus and Rampelt, Florian and Stetten, Alexander von and Wittke, Andreas and Theeraroungchaisri, Anuchai and Thammetar, Thapanee and Duangchinda, Vorasuang and Khlaisang, Jintavee and Mair, Bettina and Steinkellner, Iris and Stojcevic, Ivana and Zwiauer, Charlotte and Thirouard, Maria and Vill{\`e}sbrunne, Marie de la and Bernaert, Oliver and Nohr, Magnus and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and Kiendl, Doris and Terzieva, Liliya and Concia, Francesca and Distler, Petr and Law, Gareth and Macerata, Elena and Mariani, Mario and Mossini, Eros and Negrin, Maddalena and Štrok, Marko and Neub{\"o}ck, Kristina and Linschinger, Nadine and Lorenz, Anja and Bock, Stefanie and Schulte-Ostermann, Juleka and Moura Santos, Ana and Corti, Paola and Costa, Luis Felipe Coimbra and Utunen, Heini and Attias, Melissa and Tokar, Anna and Kennedy, Eileen and Laurillard, Diana and Zeitoun, Samar and Wasilewski, Julie and Shlaka, Souhad and Ouahib, Sara and Berrada, Khalid and Dietz, Michael and Roth, Dennis}, title = {EMOOCs 2023}, editor = {Meinel, Christoph and Schweiger, Stefanie and Staubitz, Thomas and Conrad, Robert and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Ebner, Martin and Sancassani, Susanna and Żur, Agnieszka and Friedl, Christian and Halawa, Sherif and Gamage, Dilrukshi and Cross, Jeffrey and Jonson Carlon, May Kristine and Deville, Yves and Gaebel, Michael and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and von Schmieden, Karen}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57645}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-576450}, year = {2023}, abstract = {From June 14 to June 16, 2023, Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, hosted the eighth European MOOC Stakeholder Summit (EMOOCs 2023). The pandemic is fortunately over. It has once again shown how important digital education is. How well-prepared a country was could be seen in our schools, universities, and companies. In different countries, the problems manifested themselves differently. The measures and approaches to solving the problems varied accordingly. Digital education, whether micro-credentials, MOOCs, blended learning formats, or other e-learning tools, received a major boost. EMOOCs 2023 focusses on the effects of this emergency situation. How has it affected the development and delivery of MOOCs and other e-learning offerings all over Europe? Which projects can serve as models for successful digital learning and teaching? Which roles can MOOCs and micro-credentials bear in the current business transformation? Is there a backlash to the routine we knew from pre-Corona times? Or have many things become firmly established in the meantime, e.g. remote work, hybrid conferences, etc.? Furthermore, EMOOCs 2023 has a closer look at the development and formalization of digital learning. Micro-credentials are just the starting point. Further steps in this direction would be complete online study programs or full online universities. Another main topic is the networking of learning offers and the standardization of formats and metadata. Examples of fruitful cooperations are the MOOChub, the European MOOC Consortium, and the Common Micro-Credential Framework. The learnings, derived from practical experience and research, are explored in EMOOCs 2023 in four tracks and additional workshops, covering various aspects of this field. In this publication, we present papers from the conference's Research \& Experience Track, the Business Track and the International Track.}, language = {en} } @misc{SerthStaubitzvanEltenetal.2022, author = {Serth, Sebastian and Staubitz, Thomas and van Elten, Martin and Meinel, Christoph}, title = {Measuring the effects of course modularizations in online courses for life-long learners}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakult{\"a}t}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakult{\"a}t}, number = {17}, editor = {Gamage, Dilrukshi}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58918}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-589182}, pages = {15}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Many participants in Massive Open Online Courses are full-time employees seeking greater flexibility in their time commitment and the available learning paths. We recently addressed these requirements by splitting up our 6-week courses into three 2-week modules followed by a separate exam. Modularizing courses offers many advantages: Shorter modules are more sustainable and can be combined, reused, and incorporated into learning paths more easily. Time flexibility for learners is also improved as exams can now be offered multiple times per year, while the learning content is available independently. In this article, we answer the question of which impact this modularization has on key learning metrics, such as course completion rates, learning success, and no-show rates. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of longer breaks between modules on these metrics. According to our analysis, course modules facilitate more selective learning behaviors that encourage learners to focus on topics they are the most interested in. At the same time, participation in overarching exams across all modules seems to be less appealing compared to an integrated exam of a 6-week course. While breaks between the modules increase the distinctive appearance of individual modules, a break before the final exam further reduces initial interest in the exams. We further reveal that participation in self-paced courses as a preparation for the final exam is unlikely to attract new learners to the course offerings, even though learners' performance is comparable to instructor-paced courses. The results of our long-term study on course modularization provide a solid foundation for future research and enable educators to make informed decisions about the design of their courses.}, language = {en} } @article{SerthStaubitzvanEltenetal.2022, author = {Serth, Sebastian and Staubitz, Thomas and van Elten, Martin and Meinel, Christoph}, title = {Measuring the effects of course modularizations in online courses for life-long learners}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, editor = {Gamage, Dilrukshi}, publisher = {Frontiers}, address = {Lausanne, Schweiz}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.1008545}, pages = {15}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Many participants in Massive Open Online Courses are full-time employees seeking greater flexibility in their time commitment and the available learning paths. We recently addressed these requirements by splitting up our 6-week courses into three 2-week modules followed by a separate exam. Modularizing courses offers many advantages: Shorter modules are more sustainable and can be combined, reused, and incorporated into learning paths more easily. Time flexibility for learners is also improved as exams can now be offered multiple times per year, while the learning content is available independently. In this article, we answer the question of which impact this modularization has on key learning metrics, such as course completion rates, learning success, and no-show rates. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of longer breaks between modules on these metrics. According to our analysis, course modules facilitate more selective learning behaviors that encourage learners to focus on topics they are the most interested in. At the same time, participation in overarching exams across all modules seems to be less appealing compared to an integrated exam of a 6-week course. While breaks between the modules increase the distinctive appearance of individual modules, a break before the final exam further reduces initial interest in the exams. We further reveal that participation in self-paced courses as a preparation for the final exam is unlikely to attract new learners to the course offerings, even though learners' performance is comparable to instructor-paced courses. The results of our long-term study on course modularization provide a solid foundation for future research and enable educators to make informed decisions about the design of their courses.}, language = {en} } @misc{StaubitzWilkinsHagedornetal.2017, author = {Staubitz, Thomas and Wilkins, Christian and Hagedorn, Christiane and Meinel, Christoph}, title = {The Gamification of a MOOC Platform}, series = {Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)}, journal = {Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {New York}, isbn = {978-1-5090-5467-1}, issn = {2165-9567}, doi = {10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942952}, pages = {883 -- 892}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have left their mark on the face of education during the recent years. At the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) in Potsdam, Germany, we are actively developing a MOOC platform, which provides our research with a plethora of e-learning topics, such as learning analytics, automated assessment, peer assessment, team-work, online proctoring, and gamification. We run several instances of this platform. On openHPI, we provide our own courses from within the HPI context. Further instances are openSAP, openWHO, and mooc.HOUSE, which is the smallest of these platforms, targeting customers with a less extensive course portfolio. In 2013, we started to work on the gamification of our platform. By now, we have implemented about two thirds of the features that we initially have evaluated as useful for our purposes. About a year ago we activated the implemented gamification features on mooc.HOUSE. Before activating the features on openHPI as well, we examined, and re-evaluated our initial considerations based on the data we collected so far and the changes in other contexts of our platforms.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching - How it was influenced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020}, series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086}, pages = {15}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.}, language = {en} } @misc{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Students' Acceptance of Technology-Mediated Teaching - How It Was Influenced During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study From Germany}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52161}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-521615}, pages = {17}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.}, language = {en} }