@article{RieseVogelsangSchroederetal.2022,
  author    = {Riese, Josef and Vogelsang, Christoph and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Borowski, Andreas and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst},
  title     = {The development of lesson planning skills in the subject of physics},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer VS/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-022-01112-0},
  pages     = {843 -- 867},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {One main goal of university teacher education is the first acquisition of skills for theory-driven lesson planning. According to models of teachers' professional competence, it is assumed that the acquired professional knowledge represents an essential basis for the development of planning skills. Learning opportunities to apply this professional knowledge often occur in school internships, usually in advanced semesters of teacher education programs. It is also assumed that practical experience within lesson planning supports the formation of professional knowledge. However, the relationship between the extent of professional knowledge and the development of skills to plan a lesson lacks evidence. There is a particular challenge in measuring lesson planning skills both authentically and standardized. To evaluate the mentioned relationship, a longitudinal pre-post-study with prospective physics-teachers (N = 68 in the longitudinal section) was conducted at four German universities. Pre-service physics teachers' skills to plan a lesson were assessed with a standardized performance assessment at the beginning and at the end of a longterm-internship. This assessment consists of planning a physics lesson, conveying Newton's third Law, in a simulated and standardized way with limited time. In addition, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge has been assessed using standardized instruments. Furthermore, additional information about the internship and the amount of learning opportunities was collected at the end of the internship. During the internship, both lesson planning skills and all components of professional knowledge increased. Cross-Lagged-Panel-Analyses reveal that in particular pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge as well as pedagogical knowledge at the beginning of the internship influences the development of lesson planning skills.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KulgemeyerBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2020,
  author    = {Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Vogelsang, Christoph},
  title     = {Professional knowledge affects action-related skills},
  series = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0022-4308},
  doi       = {10.1002/tea.21632},
  pages     = {1554 -- 1582},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Professional knowledge is an important source of science teachers' actions in the classroom (e.g., personal professional content knowledge [pedagogical content knowledge, PCK] is the source of enacted PCK in the refined consensus model [RCM] for PCK). However, the evidence for this claim is ambiguous at best. This study applied a cross-lagged panel design to examine the relationship between professional knowledge and actions in one particular instructional situation: explaining physics. Pre- and post a field experience (one semester), 47 preservice physics teachers from four different universities were tested for their content knowledge (CK), PCK, pedagogical knowledge (PK), and action-related skills in explaining physics. The study showed that joint professional knowledge (the weighted sum of CK, PCK, and PK scores) at the beginning of the field experience impacted the development of explaining skills during the field experience (beta = .38**). We interpret this as a particular relationship between professional knowledge and science teachers' action-related skills (enacted PCK): professional knowledge is necessary for the development of explaining skills. That is evidence that personal PCK affects enacted PCK. In addition, field experiences are often supposed to bridge the theory-practice gap by transforming professional knowledge into instructional practice. Our results suggest that for field experiences to be effective, preservice teachers should start with profound professional knowledge.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelsangBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2019,
  author    = {Vogelsang, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan},
  title     = {Entwicklung von Professionswissen und Unterrichtsperformanz im Lehramtsstudium Physik},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  volume    = {65},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Beltz},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {0044-3247},
  pages     = {473 -- 491},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Angehende Physiklehrkr{\"a}fte sollen im Rahmen ihres Studiums fachliches und fachdidaktisches Wissen erwerben, welches die Gestaltung lernf{\"o}rderlichen Unterrichts erm{\"o}glicht. Es ist allerdings empirisch nur wenig gekl{\"a}rt, wie sich dieses Wissen im Laufe des Studiums entwickelt und ob es zur Ausbildung von Handlungsf{\"a}higkeiten beitr{\"a}gt. Um derartige Wirkungsaussagen treffen zu k{\"o}nnen, m{\"u}ssen Instrumente entwickelt werden, die eine valide Testwertinterpretation zulassen. In diesem Beitrag werden auf Basis von im Projekt Profile-P+ entwickelten Instrumenten Validit{\"a}tsanalysen zur l{\"a}ngsschnittlichen Entwicklung des Professionswissens von Physiklehramtsstudierenden im Verlauf des Bachelorstudiums und ihrer F{\"a}higkeiten zur Planung und Reflexion von Physikunterricht sowie zum Erkl{\"a}ren von physikalischen Sachverhalten vor und nach dem Praxissemester dargestellt. Neben Wissenstests kamen standardisierte Performanztests zum Einsatz. Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse sprechen daf{\"u}r, dass die erhobenen Messwerte im Sinne von Wirkungsaussagen interpretiert werden k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RieseKulgemeyerZanderetal.2015,
  author    = {Riese, Josef and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Zander, Simon and Borowski, Andreas and Fischer, Hans E. and Gramzow, Yvonne and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst and Tomczyszyn, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Modeling and Measurement of Professional Knowledge in Physics Teacher Training},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  publisher = {Beltz},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {0044-3247},
  pages     = {55 -- 79},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {For improving teacher education, there has been an increasing interest in describing teachers' professional competencies and their development in the course of implementing educational programs. The focus of the present project is on modeling and measuring domain-specific and generic competencies that future physics teachers acquire during their university studies. The model comprises characteristics and relationships between physics content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and skills for explaining physics phenomena. Based on the model, assessment instruments were developed and applied as paper-and-pencil-tests and videotaped expert-novice dialogues for measuring the competencies in a large sample of physics student teachers. Trials and validation suggest that our instruments are valid in terms of content and construct validities.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MuszynskiOssnerRothangeletal.2009,
  author    = {Muszynski, Bernd and Ossner, Jakob and Rothangel, Martin and Schecker, Horst and Vollmer, Helmut J.},
  title     = {Mindeststandards am Ende der Pflichtschulzeit : Erwartungen des Einzelnen und der Gesellschaft, Erwartungen des Einzelnen und der Gesellschaft ; Positionspapier},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Das vorliegende Papier wurde im Auftrag der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Fachdidaktik (GFD) von Bernd Muszynski (Politikdidaktik/Universit{\"a}t Potsdam), Jakob Ossner (Deutschdidaktik/ PH St. Gallen), Martin Rothgangel, (ev. Religionsp{\"a}dagogik/Universit{\"a}t G{\"o}ttingen), Horst Schecker (Physikdidaktik/Universit{\"a}t Bremen), Helmut J. Vollmer (Englischdidaktik/Universit{\"a}t Osnabr{\"u}ck) verfasst. - Zusammenfassung: Trotz der Forderung der Expertise von Klieme u.a. (2003), dass es zu den Aufgaben der n{\"a}chsten Zeit geh{\"o}re, Mindeststandards zu formulieren, liegen bis heute nur die 2003/04 formulierten Regelstandards der KMK vor. Mit dem vorliegenden Papier versucht die Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Fachdidaktik (GFD), die Diskussion {\"u}ber Mindeststandards voranzubringen. Dabei werden Mindeststandards mit dem Ziel der individuellen Entfaltung und gesellschaftlichen Partizipation unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung unterschiedlicher Modi der Weltbegegnung ausgewiesen. Die Bezugnahme auf die Modi der Weltbegegnung, wie sie Baumert (2002) in die Diskussion eingef{\"u}hrt hat, garantiert, dass ein breites Verst{\"a}ndnis von Bildung auch den Mindeststandards zu Grunde gelegt wird. Unter dieser Perspektive werden im Rahmen der Anerkennung einer Fachlichkeit von Bildungsprozessen nicht nur einzelfachliche, sondern vor allem auch fach{\"u}bergreifende Zug{\"a}nge erforderlich mit der Konsequenz, ein auf Mindeststandards hin ausgerichtetes Kerncurriculum {\"u}ber die Einzelf{\"a}cher hinaus einzuf{\"u}hren. Hinzu kommen {\"u}berfachliche Standards wie Teamf{\"a}higkeit, Konfliktf{\"a}higkeit etc., die zwar auch in F{\"a}chern aufgebaut, die aber zugleich von der Institution Schule als Ganzes verantwortet werden m{\"u}ssen. Mindeststandards sind nach Auffassung der GFD als normative Setzungen zu sehen, die das Recht des Einzelnen auf grundlegende Bildung fokussieren und den Anspruch der Gesellschaft an die Institution Schule, dies f{\"u}r jedermann zu gew{\"a}hrleisten. Schulunterricht muss explizit solche Kompetenzen, die alle Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler als Mindestmaß f{\"u}r die eigene individuelle Entfaltung und die gesellschaftliche Partizipation sowie als Grundlage f{\"u}r lebenslanges Lernen erwerben m{\"u}ssen, {\"u}ber Schularten hinweg st{\"a}rker in den Blick nehmen und sichern.},
  language  = {de}
}