@article{KorteTiberiusBrem2021, author = {Korte, Andreas and Tiberius, Victor and Brem, Alexander}, title = {Internet of Things (IoT) technology research in business and management literature}, series = {Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research}, number = {6}, publisher = {MPDI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {0718-1876}, doi = {10.3390/jtaer16060116}, pages = {2073 -- 2090}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In coherence with the progressive digitalization of all areas of life, the Internet of Things (IoT) is a flourishing concept in both research and practice. Due to the increasing scholarly attention, the literature landscape has become scattered and fragmented. With a focus on the commercial application of the IoT and corresponding research, we employ a co-citation analysis and literature review to structure the field. We find and describe 19 research themes. To consolidate the extant research, we propose a research framework, which is based on a theoretical implementation process of IoT as a concept, specific IoT applications, or architectures integrated in an adapted input-process-output model. The main variables of the model are an initial definition and conceptualization of an IoT concept (input), which goes through an evaluation process (process), before it is implemented and can have an impact in practice (output). The paper contributes to interdisciplinary research relating to a business and management perspective on IoT by providing a holistic overview of predominant research themes and an integrative research framework.}, language = {en} } @article{TiberiusHauptmeijer2021, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Hauptmeijer, Raoul}, title = {Equity crowdfunding}, series = {Journal of small business management : advancing small business management and entrepreneurship research worldwide / published on behalf of the International Council for Small Business}, volume = {59}, journal = {Journal of small business management : advancing small business management and entrepreneurship research worldwide / published on behalf of the International Council for Small Business}, number = {2}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {0047-2778}, doi = {10.1080/00472778.2020.1849714}, pages = {337 -- 369}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In this study, we explore the development of equity crowdfunding (ECF) over the next 5 to 10 years by conducting an international Delphi study. Our results indicate that the ECF market is expected to grow significantly. However, it is unlikely to disrupt other forms of financing and will not cover all SME financing needs. ECF will remain a funding technique for SMEs and small investors; it is unlikely to attract large corporations or institutional investors. Platforms will impose stricter requirements for capital raisers, expand their services, and innovate their business models. National governments will probably partly liberalize the ECF market.}, language = {en} } @misc{TiberiusRietzBouncken2020, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Rietz, Meike and Bouncken, Ricarda B.}, title = {Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {3}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52509}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-525092}, pages = {23}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure-agency problem by focusing on the change agent's goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view.}, language = {en} } @article{TiberiusRietzBouncken2020, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Rietz, Meike and Bouncken, Ricarda B.}, title = {Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research}, series = {Administrative Sciences}, volume = {10}, journal = {Administrative Sciences}, number = {3}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, doi = {10.3390/admsci10030069}, pages = {21}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure-agency problem by focusing on the change agent's goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view.}, language = {en} }