@article{WestphalZawackiRichter2021,
  author    = {Westphal, Andrea and Zawacki-Richter, Olaf},
  title     = {Von der allgemeinen Erziehungswissenschaft zur empirischen Bildungsforschung?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft : ZfE},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft : ZfE},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer VS/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-021-01008-5},
  pages     = {641 -- 669},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The present study examines articles published in Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft (ZfE-Journal of Educational Sciences) between 1998 and 2017, to discover whether the thematic focus of the articles it published during this period changed over time. To do this, we scrutinized articles in four consecutive five-year periods: 1998-2002, 2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2017. Using the titles and abstracts of 821 articles published between 1998 and 2017, we conducted a quantitative text analysis and identified the most frequent and most characteristic bigrams that emerged during these periods. In addition, we looked at whether specific word stems (e.g., "erziehungswissenschaft", "bildungsforsch", "didakt") began to occur more frequently over the two decades under study. Finally, we used the text mining tool Leximancer (TM) to construct concept maps that point to the semantic structure of the topics and key concepts in the analyzed articles. The results indicate that, over the course of this twenty-year period, the ZfE predominantly published empirical articles with a focus on the social aspects of education, but that its focus on research into general pedagogy decreased in frequency.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmidtMartinLopezPhillipsetal.2018,
  author    = {Schmidt, Katja and Martin-Lopez, Berta and Phillips, Peter M. and Julius, Eike and Makan, Neville and Walz, Ariane},
  title     = {Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services},
  series = {Land use policy},
  volume    = {82},
  journal   = {Land use policy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0264-8377},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.022},
  pages     = {353 -- 366},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Whereas ecosystem service research is increasingly being promoted in science and policy, the utilisation of ecosystem services knowledge remains largely underexplored for regional ecosystem management. To overcome the mere generation of knowledge and contribute to decision-making, scientists are facing the challenge of articulating specific implications of the ecosystem service approach for practical land use management. In this contribution, we compare the results of participatory mapping of ecosystem services with the existing management plan for the Pentland Hills Regional Park (Scotland, UK) to inform its future management plan. By conducting participatory mapping in a workshop with key stakeholders (n = 20), we identify hotspots of ecosystem services and the landscape features underpinning such hotspots. We then analyse to what extent these landscape features are the focus of the current management plan. We found a clear mismatch between the key landscape features underpinning the provision of ecosystem services and the management strategy suggested. Our findings allow for a better understanding of the required focus of future land use management to account for ecosystem services.},
  language  = {en}
}