@article{Saddy1995,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas},
  title     = {On the semantics of scope in agrammatism},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Saddy1995,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas},
  title     = {Variables and events in the syntax of agrammatic speech},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaddyBeimGrabenSchlesewsky1999,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas and Beim Graben, Peter and Schlesewsky, Matthias},
  title     = {Measuring entropy during language processing},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaddyBeimGrabenSchlesewsky1999,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas and Beim Graben, Peter and Schlesewsky, Matthias},
  title     = {Cortical Dynamics of Language Processes},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaddySchlesewskyBeimGraben1999,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas and Schlesewsky, Matthias and Beim Graben, Peter},
  title     = {Cylinder Entropies and Case resolution},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Saddy1999,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas},
  title     = {Measuring the dynamics of language processes},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeimGrabenSaddySchlesewskyetal.2000,
  author    = {Beim Graben, Peter and Saddy, Douglas and Schlesewsky, Matthias and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Symbolic dynamics of event-related brain potentials},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FrischSaddyFriederici2000,
  author    = {Frisch, Stefan and Saddy, Douglas and Friederici, A. D.},
  title     = {Cutting a long story (too) short},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaddyUriagereka2004,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas and Uriagereka, J.},
  title     = {Measuring language},
  issn      = {0218-1274},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {The study of language, its processing and its bearing on human cortical processes are all extensive domains of investigation in their own right. In this overview tutorial we limit ourselves to a sample of core illustrative issues. Our central aim is to demonstrate how complexity within the language faculty arises from two a priori distinct sources: the computational complexity inherent in the grammar of the language system itself and the procedural complexity resulting from marshalling processing resources in order to produce or interpret utterances that correspond to the grammar. Distinguishing between these two sources of complexity is a current goal in investigations of the human language faculty. The combination of quantitative approaches with newer qualitative approaches to the analysis of electro-cortical behaviour associated with carefully controlled language paradigms represents a new approach to clarifying this central issue},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaddyDrenhausFrisch2004,
  author    = {Saddy, Douglas and Drenhaus, Heiner and Frisch, Stefan},
  title     = {Processing polarity items : Contrastive licensing costs},
  issn      = {0093-934X},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {We describe an experiment that investigated the failure to license polarity items in German using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The results reveal distinct processing reflexes associated with failure to license positive polarity items in comparison to failure to license negative polarity items. Failure to license both negative and positive polarity items elicited an N400 component reflecting semantic integration cost. Failure to license positive polarity items, however, also elicited a P600 component. The additional P600 in the positive polarity violations may reflect higher processing complexity associated with a negative operator. This difference between the two types of violation suggests that the processing of negative and positive polarity items does not involve identical mechanisms. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved},
  language  = {en}
}