@article{Bangeow2021,
  author    = {Bangeow, Petjo},
  title     = {Zur Abschaffung des Gutachterverfahrens in der Vertragspsychotherapie - ein Qualit{\"a}tsverlust?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1422-4917},
  doi       = {10.1024/1422-4917/a000778},
  pages     = {64 -- 72},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objectives: This article investigates whether or not the abolishment of the expertise procedure for an outpatient psychotherapy is a reliable quality feature; and whether or not the elimination of this procedure results in a reduction of quality in outpatient psychotherapy. Methods: We conducted a literature research that considered articles written between the years 2000 and 2020 dealing with the expertise procedure as a quality standard of outpatient psychotherapy. In order to discuss the different views of the cited authors, we also refer to further literature. Results: The expertise procedure is not a reliable quality feature of outpatient psychotherapy. The idea that abolishing the expertise procedure results in a reduction of quality in outpatient psychotherapy is not confirmed by the studies summarized.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BangeowRapp2020,
  author    = {Bangeow, Petjo and Rapp, Michael A.},
  title     = {Beurteilung und Nutzung der 2016 reformierten Psychotherapierichtlinie},
  series = {Psychiatrische Praxis : Sozialpsychiatrie, klinische Psychiatrie, public mental health, Versorgungsforschung},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Psychiatrische Praxis : Sozialpsychiatrie, klinische Psychiatrie, public mental health, Versorgungsforschung},
  number    = {07},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0303-4259},
  doi       = {10.1055/a-1045-9820},
  pages     = {383 -- 387},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Ziel der Studie Dieser Artikel untersucht, inwiefern sich die 2016 reformierte Richtlinie im Stadt-Land- sowie im Ost-West-Vergleich auf die ambulante psychotherapeutische Arbeit und Versorgung auswirkt. Methodik Eine Onlineumfrage unter vertrags{\"a}rztlich t{\"a}tigen TherapeutInnen wurde durchgef{\"u}hrt. Die Fragen bezogen sich auf verschiedene Neuerungen in der Richtlinie. Ergebnisse Unabh{\"a}ngig von der Region sch{\"a}tzten die Befragten ein, dass die Reform zu keiner verbesserten Versorgung f{\"u}hrte. Im Westen und in der Stadt t{\"a}tige TherapeutInnen verwiesen PatientInnen nach der Sprechstunde {\"o}fter an andere Psychotherapiepraxen, im Osten und auf dem Land t{\"a}tige hingegen {\"o}fter auf andere Hilfeangebote. Schlussfolgerung St{\"a}rkere Anreize f{\"u}r die psychotherapeutische T{\"a}tigkeit auf dem Land sind zu schaffen. Abbaumaßnahmen der Ost-West-Ungleichheiten in der Versorgungsdichte scheinen n{\"o}tig.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BangeowRapp2020,
  author    = {Bangeow, Petjo and Rapp, Michael A.},
  title     = {Beurteilung und Nutzung der 2016 reformierten Psychotherapierichtlinie},
  series = {Psychiatrische Praxis},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Psychiatrische Praxis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0303-4259},
  doi       = {10.1055/a-1045-9801},
  pages     = {135 -- 141},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective This article investigates how aspects of 2016 reform of the German psychotherapeutic guideline were evaluated and used differently by therapists from three different psychotherapeutic treatment methods. <br /> Methods An online survey was conducted with 987 statutory health insurance approved therapists. The questionnaire focused on various innovations in the guideline. <br /> Results There were significant differences in the use of the broadened authority and of specific treatment services. There were also differences in the application for short-term and long-term psychotherapies as well as in the application to extend short to long-term psychotherapy. <br /> Conclusions Elements of the guideline should be evaluated in relation to the preferred treatment method. Aspects related to the psychotherapeutic work with patients seem to be especially significant.},
  language  = {de}
}