@article{Тарасенко2011, author = {Тарасенко, О.А.}, title = {Введение в российское банковское право}, series = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, journal = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-58602}, pages = {99 -- 113}, year = {2011}, abstract = {1. Банковское право как отрасль права 2. Предмет, метод и система банковского права 3. Источники банковского права}, language = {ru} } @article{Тарасенко2011, author = {Тарасенко, О.А.}, title = {Современная банковская система Российской Федерации}, series = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, journal = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-58633}, pages = {129 -- 151}, year = {2011}, abstract = {1. Понятие и структура банковской системы 2. Принципы и особенности банковской системы 3. Классификация кредитных организаций 4. Динамика деятельности кредитных организаций}, language = {ru} } @article{Моисеев2011, author = {Моисеев, Е.Г.}, title = {Международное право на современном этапе}, series = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, journal = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-58569}, pages = {53 -- 58}, year = {2011}, abstract = {1 Международное право прав человека 2 Право международной безопасности}, language = {de} } @article{Калиниченко2011, author = {Калиниченко, П.А.}, title = {Европеизация российского права}, series = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, journal = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-58584}, pages = {65 -- 86}, year = {2011}, abstract = {1. Вводные замечания и определения 2. Европеизация российского права и правовой культуры: история и современность 3. Европеизация российского законодательства 4. Европеизация российской судебной практики 5. Заключение}, language = {ru} } @article{Ищенко2011, author = {Ищенко, Е.П.}, title = {Некоторые современные достижения российской криминалистики}, series = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, journal = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-58545}, pages = {15 -- 41}, year = {2011}, language = {ru} } @article{Викторова2011, author = {Викторова, Н.Н.}, title = {Введение в международное частное право России}, series = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, journal = {Die Woche des russischen Rechts , Potsdam , 10.-15.05.2010 (mit der Moskauer Staatlichen Juristischen O. E. Kutafin Akademie)}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-58659}, pages = {173 -- 198}, year = {2011}, abstract = {1. Предмет международного частного права 2. Понятие международного частного права 3. Развитие МЧП 4. Содержание МЧП 5. Источники МЧП 6. Коллизионные нормы 7. Обратная отсылка и отсылка к праву третьего государства (renvoi) 8. Проблема квалификации в МЧП 9. Применение иностранного права, установление содержания иностранного права 10. Оговорка о публичном порядке 11. Императивные нормы 12. Основные коллизионные принципы}, language = {ru} } @misc{Zuellich2011, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Z{\"u}llich, Gunda}, title = {Migration and development in Senegal : a system dynamics analysis of the feedback relationships}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-57836}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2011}, abstract = {This thesis investigates the reciprocal relationship between migration and development in Senegal. Therewith, it contributes to the debate as to whether migration in developing countries enhances or rather impedes the development process. Even though extensive and controversial discussions can be found in the scientific literature regarding the impact of migration on development, research has scarcely examined the feedback relationships between migration and development. Science however agrees with both the fact that migration affects development as well as that the level of development in a country determines migration behaviour. Thus, both variables are neither dependent nor independent, but endogenous variables influencing each other and producing behavioural pattern that cannot be investigated using a static and unidirectional approach. On account of this, the thesis studies the feedback mechanisms existing between migration and development and the behavioural pattern generated by the high interdependence in order to be able to draw conclusions concerning the impact of changes in migration behaviour on the development process. To explore these research questions, the study applies the computer simulation method 'System Dynamics' and amplifies the simulation model for national development planning called 'Threshold 21' (T21), representing development processes endogenously and integrating economic, social and environmental aspects, using a structure that portrays the reasons and consequences of migration. The model has been customised to Senegal, being an appropriate representative of the theoretical interesting universe of cases. The comparison of the model generated scenarios - in which the intensity of emigration, the loss and gain of education, the remittances or the level of dependence changes - facilitates the analysis. The present study produces two important results. The first outcome is the development of an integrative framework representing migration and development in an endogenous way and incorporating several aspects of different theories. This model can be used as a starting point for further discussions and improvements and it is a fairly relevant and useful result against the background that migration is not integrated into most of the development planning tools despite its significant impact. The second outcome is the gained insights concerning the feedback relations between migration and development and the impact of changes in migration on development. To give two examples: It could be found that migration impacts development positively, indicated by HDI, but that the dominant behaviour of migration and development is a counteracting behaviour. That means that an increase in emigration leads to an improvement in development, while this in turn causes a decline in emigration, counterbalancing the initial increase. Another insight concerns the discovery that migration causes a decline in education in the short term, but leads to an increase in the long term, after approximately 25 years - a typical worse-before-better behaviour. From these and further observations, important policy implications can be derived for the sending and receiving countries. Hence, by overcoming the unidirectional perspective, this study contributes to an improved understanding of the highly complex relationship between migration and development and their feedback relations.}, language = {en} } @article{Zyla2011, author = {Zyla, Benjamin}, title = {Außenpolitisches Selbstverst{\"a}ndnis}, series = {WeltTrends-Papiere}, journal = {WeltTrends-Papiere}, number = {20}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1864-0656}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62791}, pages = {38 -- 41}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Zurell2011, author = {Zurell, Damaris}, title = {Integrating dynamic and statistical modelling approaches in order to improve predictions for scenarios of environmental change}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-56845}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Species respond to environmental change by dynamically adjusting their geographical ranges. Robust predictions of these changes are prerequisites to inform dynamic and sustainable conservation strategies. Correlative species distribution models (SDMs) relate species' occurrence records to prevailing environmental factors to describe the environmental niche. They have been widely applied in global change context as they have comparably low data requirements and allow for rapid assessments of potential future species' distributions. However, due to their static nature, transient responses to environmental change are essentially ignored in SDMs. Furthermore, neither dispersal nor demographic processes and biotic interactions are explicitly incorporated. Therefore, it has often been suggested to link statistical and mechanistic modelling approaches in order to make more realistic predictions of species' distributions for scenarios of environmental change. In this thesis, I present two different ways of such linkage. (i) Mechanistic modelling can act as virtual playground for testing statistical models and allows extensive exploration of specific questions. I promote this 'virtual ecologist' approach as a powerful evaluation framework for testing sampling protocols, analyses and modelling tools. Also, I employ such an approach to systematically assess the effects of transient dynamics and ecological properties and processes on the prediction accuracy of SDMs for climate change projections. That way, relevant mechanisms are identified that shape the species' response to altered environmental conditions and which should hence be considered when trying to project species' distribution through time. (ii) I supplement SDM projections of potential future habitat for black grouse in Switzerland with an individual-based population model. By explicitly considering complex interactions between habitat availability and demographic processes, this allows for a more direct assessment of expected population response to environmental change and associated extinction risks. However, predictions were highly variable across simulations emphasising the need for principal evaluation tools like sensitivity analysis to assess uncertainty and robustness in dynamic range predictions. Furthermore, I identify data coverage of the environmental niche as a likely cause for contrasted range predictions between SDM algorithms. SDMs may fail to make reliable predictions for truncated and edge niches, meaning that portions of the niche are not represented in the data or niche edges coincide with data limits. Overall, my thesis contributes to an improved understanding of uncertainty factors in predictions of range dynamics and presents ways how to deal with these. Finally I provide preliminary guidelines for predictive modelling of dynamic species' response to environmental change, identify key challenges for future research and discuss emerging developments.}, language = {en} } @article{ZuppingerDingleySchmidChenetal.2011, author = {Zuppinger-Dingley, D. and Schmid, Bernhard and Chen, Y. and Brandl, H. and van der Heijden, M. G. A. and Joshi, Jasmin Radha}, title = {In their native range, invasive plants are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks}, series = {Ecosphere : the magazine of the International Ecology University}, volume = {2}, journal = {Ecosphere : the magazine of the International Ecology University}, number = {5}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Washington}, issn = {2150-8925}, doi = {10.1890/ES11-00061.1}, pages = {12}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The ability of some plant species to dominate communities in new biogeographical ranges has been attributed to an innate higher competitive ability and release from co-evolved specialist enemies. Specifically, invasive success in the new range might be explained by release from biotic negative soil-feedbacks, which control potentially dominant species in their native range. To test this hypothesis, we grew individuals from sixteen phylogenetically paired European grassland species that became either invasive or naturalized in new ranges, in either sterilized soil or in sterilized soil with unsterilized soil inoculum from their native home range. We found that although the native members of invasive species generally performed better than those of naturalized species, these native members of invasive species also responded more negatively to native soil inoculum than did the native members of naturalized species. This supports our hypothesis that potentially invasive species in their native range are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks. However, contrary to expectation, negative soil-feedbacks in potentially invasive species were not much increased by interspecific competition. There was no significant variation among families between invasive and naturalized species regarding their feedback response (negative vs. neutral). Therefore, we conclude that the observed negative soil feedbacks in potentially invasive species may be quite widespread in European families of typical grassland species.}, language = {en} }