@misc{Andreeva2022,
  author    = {Andreeva, Anna},
  title     = {Frauenfilmdramaturgie im Russischen Kaiserreich der 1910er Jahre},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {182},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58671},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-586718},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Im Artikel werden von Frauen verfasste Filmdrehb{\"u}cher der 1910er Jahre im Russischen Kaiserreich chronologisch untersucht. Zun{\"a}chst werden die ersten Drehbuchautorinnen Makarova und Tat'jana Suchotina-Tolstaja, die am Anfang der 1910er Jahre in Koautorschaft mit den bekannten Autoren (Makarova mit den Regisseur Vladimir Gončarov; Suchotina-Tolstaja mit ihrem Vater Leo Tolstoj) arbeiteten, und ihre Filme in Betracht gezogen. Dann wird der Film Ključi sčastʹja / Schl{\"u}ssel zum Gl{\"u}ck (Vladimir Gardin, Jakov Protazanov, 1913, Russisches Kaiserreich) nach dem Roman von Anastasija Verbickaja n{\"a}her behandelt. Verbickajas Film demonstrierte, dass eine Drehbuchautorin eine selbst{\"a}ndige Autorin sein kann und diente als Impuls f{\"u}r die Entwicklung der Frauenfilmdramaturgie im Russischen Kaiserreich, deren Aufschwung in der zweiten H{\"a}lfte der 1910er Jahre begann, und pr{\"a}gte bestimmte Erwartungen von auf weiblichen Drehb{\"u}chern basierenden Filmen. Maria Kallaš, die an den Drehb{\"u}chern zu den Verfilmungen des russischen literarischen Kanons 1913 arbeitete, kritisierte Verbickajas Text als pseudofeministisch und behauptete in ihrem Essay „Ženskie kabare" („Frauenkabarett"), dass Frauenliteratur noch „keine eigene Sprache" habe (1916). Anna Mar begann ihre Arbeit im Kino 1914, parallel zu Verbiсkajas Nachfolgerinnen, und konzentrierte sich in ihren Filmen auf die soziale Problematik - die Stellung moderner Frauen in der Gesellschaft. Damit er{\"o}ffnete Mar eine neue Entwicklungsperspektive f{\"u}r das weibliche Drehbuchschreiben.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{SeržantMoroz2022,
  author    = {Seržant, Ilja A. and Moroz, George A.},
  title     = {Universal attractors in language evolution provide evidence for the kinds of efficiency pressures involved},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {180},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58397},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-583976},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Efficiency is central to understanding the communicative and cognitive underpinnings of language. However, efficiency management is a complex mechanism in which different efficiency effects-such as articulatory, processing and planning ease, mental accessibility, and informativity, online and offline efficiency effects-conspire to yield the coding of linguistic signs. While we do not yet exactly understand the interactional mechanism of these different effects, we argue that universal attractors are an important component of any dynamic theory of efficiency that would be aimed at predicting efficiency effects across languages. Attractors are defined as universal states around which language evolution revolves. Methodologically, we approach efficiency from a cross-linguistic perspective on the basis of a world-wide sample of 383 languages from 53 families, balancing all six macro-areas (Eurasia, North and South America, Australia, Africa, and Oceania). We explore the grammatical domain of verbal person-number subject indexes. We claim that there is an attractor state in this domain to which languages tend to develop and tend not to leave if they happen to comply with the attractor in their earlier stages of evolution. The attractor is characterized by different lengths for each person and number combination, structured along Zipf's predictions. Moreover, the attractor strongly prefers non-compositional, cumulative coding of person and number. On the basis of these and other properties of the attractor, we conclude that there are two domains in which efficiency pressures are most powerful: strive towards less processing and articulatory effort. The latter, however, is overridden by constant information flow. Strive towards lower lexicon complexity and memory costs are weaker efficiency pressures for this grammatical category due to its order of frequency.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Kosta2015,
  author    = {Kosta, Peter},
  title     = {On the Causative/Anti-Causative Alternation as Principle of Affix Ordering in the Light of the Mirror Principle, the Lexical Integrity Principle and the Distributed Morphology},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {132},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-398587},
  pages     = {43},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {This contribution is organized as follows: in section 1, I propose a formulation of the Mirror Principle (MP) based on syntactic features; the examples will be taken from Causatives and Anti-Causatives that are derived by affixes (in Russian, Czech, Polish, German, English as compared to Japanese and Chichewa) by head-to-head movement. In section 2, I review some basic facts in support of a syntactic approach to Merge of Causatives and Anti-Causatives, proposing that theta roles are also syntactic Features that merge functional affixes with their stems in a well-defined way. I first try to give some external evidence in showing that Causatives and Anti-Causatives obey a principle of thematic hierarchy early postulated in generative literature by Jackendoff (1972; 43), and later reformulated in terms of argument-structure-ordering principle by Grimshaw (1990:chapter 2). Crucial for my paper is the working hypothesis that every syntactic theory which tries to capture the data not only descriptively but also explanatively should descend from three levels of syntactic representation: a-structure where the relation between predicate and its arguments (and adjuncts) takes place, thematic structure where the theta-roles are assigned to their arguments, and event structure, which decides about the aspectual distribution and division of events.},
  language  = {en}
}