@misc{HofreiterPaijmansGoodchildetal.2015,
  author    = {Hofreiter, Michael and Paijmans, Johanna L. A. and Goodchild, Helen and Speller, Camilla F. and Barlow, Axel and Gonzalez-Fortes, Gloria M. and Thomas, Jessica A. and Ludwig, Arne and Collins, Matthew J.},
  title     = {The future of ancient DNA},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {908},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43881},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438816},
  pages     = {284 -- 295},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Technological innovations such as next generation sequencing and DNA hybridisation enrichment have resulted in multi-fold increases in both the quantity of ancient DNA sequence data and the time depth for DNA retrieval. To date, over 30 ancient genomes have been sequenced, moving from 0.7x coverage (mammoth) in 2008 to more than 50x coverage (Neanderthal) in 2014. Studies of rapid evolutionary changes, such as the evolution and spread of pathogens and the genetic responses of hosts, or the genetics of domestication and climatic adaptation, are developing swiftly and the importance of palaeogenomics for investigating evolutionary processes during the last million years is likely to increase considerably. However, these new datasets require new methods of data processing and analysis, as well as conceptual changes in interpreting the results. In this review we highlight important areas of future technical and conceptual progress and discuss research topics in the rapidly growing field of palaeogenomics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{WestburyBalekaBarlowetal.2017,
  author    = {Westbury, Michael V. and Baleka, Sina Isabelle and Barlow, Axel and Hartmann, Stefanie and Paijmans, Johanna L. A. and Kramarz, Alejandro and Forasiepi, Anal{\´i}a M. and Bond, Mariano and Gelfo, Javier N. and Reguero, Marcelo A. and L{\´o}pez-Mendoza, Patricio and Taglioretti, Matias and Scaglia, Fernando and Rinderknecht, Andr{\´e}s and Jones, Washington and Mena, Francisco and Billet, Guillaume and de Muizon, Christian and Aguilar, Jos{\´e} Luis and MacPhee, Ross D.E. and Hofreiter, Michael},
  title     = {A mitogenomic timetree for Darwin's enigmatic South American mammal Macrauchenia patachonica},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {793},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44080},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-440801},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The unusual mix of morphological traits displayed by extinct South American native ungulates (SANUs) confounded both Charles Darwin, who first discovered them, and Richard Owen, who tried to resolve their relationships. Here we report an almost complete mitochondrial genome for the litoptern Macrauchenia. Our dated phylogenetic tree places Macrauchenia as sister to Perissodactyla, but close to the radiation of major lineages within Laurasiatheria. This position is consistent with a divergence estimate of B66Ma (95\% credibility interval, 56.64-77.83 Ma) obtained for the split between Macrauchenia and other Panperissodactyla. Combined with their morphological distinctiveness, this evidence supports the positioning of Litopterna (possibly in company with other SANU groups) as a separate order within Laurasiatheria. We also show that, when using strict criteria, extinct taxa marked by deep divergence times and a lack of close living relatives may still be amenable to palaeogenomic analysis through iterative mapping against more distant relatives.},
  language  = {en}
}