@article{KohlerPost2023,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich and Post, Julia Charlotte},
  title     = {Welcher Zweck heiligt die Mittel?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {52},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Oldenburg},
  issn      = {2366-0325},
  doi       = {10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2001},
  pages     = {67 -- 88},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Im Vergleich zu Umfragen an Wahrscheinlichkeitsstichproben bieten Umfragen an Access-Panels, die auf Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsstichproben basieren, unbestreitbare wirtschaftliche Vorteile. Diese Vorteile gehen jedoch mit unvermeidbaren Qualit{\"a}tseinbußen einher, die auch dann bestehen bleiben, wenn Erstere sehr niedrige Responseraten haben. Daher m{\"u}ssen die wirtschaftlichen Vorteile und die methodischen Einschr{\"a}nkungen gegeneinander abgewogen werden. Es wird argumentiert, dass diese Abw{\"a}gung anhand normativer Festlegungen erfolgen muss. Unter Anwendung der hier vorgeschlagenen Maßst{\"a}be kommt der Beitrag zu dem Schluss, dass die Qualit{\"a}tsanspr{\"u}che an {\"u}ber Massenmedien verbreitete Meinungsumfragen h{\"o}her sein sollten als f{\"u}r rein (sozial)wissenschaftliche Zwecke.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Tjaden2023,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper},
  title     = {Web scraping for migration, mobility, and migrant integration studies},
  series = {International migration review},
  journal   = {International migration review},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0197-9183},
  doi       = {10.1177/01979183231208428},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Web scraping, a technique for extracting data from web pages, has been in use for decades, yet its utilization in the field of migration, mobility, and migrant integration studies has been limited. The field faces notorious limitations regarding data access and availability, particularly in low-income settings. Web scraping has the potential to provide new datasets for further qualitative and quantitative analysis. Web scraping requires no financial resources, is agnostic to epistemic divides in the field, reduces researcher bias, and increases transparency and replicability of data collection. As large providers of digital data such as Facebook or Twitter increasingly restrict access to their data for researchers, web scraping will become more important in the future and deserves its place in the toolbox of migration and mobility scholars. This short and nontechnical methods note introduces the fundamental concepts of web scraping, provides guidance on how to learn the technique, showcases practical applications of web scraping in the study of migrant populations, and discusses potential future use cases.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PepplerFeisstSchneideretal.2023,
  author    = {Peppler, Lisa and Feißt, Martin and Schneider, Anna and Apelt, Maja and Schenk, Liane},
  title     = {Was ist eigentlich das Problem am Waschen?},
  series = {Das Gesundheitswesen},
  volume    = {85},
  journal   = {Das Gesundheitswesen},
  number    = {8/9},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {1439-4421},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0043-1770565},
  pages     = {799 -- 800},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Einleitung Pflege in Deutschland befindet sich in einem Ver{\"a}nderungsprozess. Die politisch forcierte Zuwanderung von Pflegekr{\"a}ften sowie die Akademisierung f{\"u}hren zu einem enormen Anpassungsdruck bei allen Beteiligten. Wie wirkt sich dies auf den Arbeitsalltag aus? Methoden Die qualitative Datenbasis umfasst bisher 36 Tage Teilnehmende Beobachtung, 17 Themenzentrierte Leitfadeninterviews sowie vier Gruppendiskussionen in vier Pflegeteams zweier Krankenh{\"a}user. Die Analyse erfolgt mit der Dokumentarischen Methode. Ergebnisse Am Beispiel der Grundpflege (u. A. dem „Waschen") wird deutlich, wie die Pflegeteams ihren Arbeitsalltag neu aushandeln. Die Teams mit einer hohen migrationsbezogenen Diversit{\"a}t argumentieren eher, dass die Aufgaben der Grund- und Behandlungspflege entsprechend der Qualifikation als Hilfs- oder Fachkraft erledigt werden sollen. Hier treten stereotype (kulturalisierende) Zuschreibungen in den Hintergrund. Demgegen{\"u}ber berufen sich Pflegeteams mit einer niedrigen migrationsbezogenen Diversit{\"a}t eher darauf, dass die Grundpflege in Deutschland - anders als in anderen L{\"a}ndern - zu den Aufgaben einer examinierten Pflegefachkraft z{\"a}hlt. Kolleg*innen aus dem Ausland wird die pflegerische Kompetenz daher eher abgesprochen. Schlussfolgerung Die Frage nach der Aufteilung von Grund- und Behandlungspflege, ist auf allen Stationen virulent. Die Teams entwickeln jedoch in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von ihrer spezifischen Heterogenit{\"a}t unterschiedliche Umgangsweisen. Demzufolge sollte sich Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung insbesondere an den Pflegeteams orientieren.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KohlerBradyGuerraetal.2023,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich and Brady, David and Guerra, Christian and Link, Bruce},
  title     = {The long term relationship between medicaid expansion and adult life-threatening chronic conditions},
  series = {Social policy and administration},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {Social policy and administration},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0037-7643},
  doi       = {10.1111/spol.12942},
  pages     = {39 -- 60},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {We test whether the expansions of children's Medicaid eligibility in the 1980s-1990s resulted in long-term health benefits in terms of severe chronic conditions. Still relatively rare in the field, we use prospective individual-level panel data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) along with the higher quality income measures from the Cross-National Equivalent File (adjusting for taxes, transfers and household size). We observe severe chronic conditions (high blood pressure/heart disease, cancer, diabetes, or lung disease) at ages 30-56 (average age 43.1) for 4670 respondents who were also prospectively observed during childhood (i.e., at ages 0-17). Our analysis exploits within-region temporal variation in childhood Medicaid eligibility and adjusts for state- and individual-level controls. We uniquely concentrate attention on adjusting for childhood income. A standard deviation greater childhood Medicaid eligibility significantly reduces the probability of severe chronic conditions in adulthood by 0.05 to 0.12 (16\%-37.5\% reduction from mean 0.32). Across the range of observed childhood Medicaid eligibility, the probability is approximately cut in half. Greater childhood Medicaid eligibility also substantially reduces childhood income disparities in severe chronic conditions. At higher levels of childhood Medicaid eligibility, we find no significant childhood income disparities in adult severe chronic conditions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mackert2023,
  author    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Soziale Schließung},
  series = {Politische Soziologie : Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium},
  journal   = {Politische Soziologie : Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-4836-5},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VerwiebeBobzienFritschetal.2023,
  author    = {Verwiebe, Roland and Bobzien, Licia and Fritsch, Nina-Sophie and Buder, Claudia},
  title     = {Social inequality and digitization in modern societies},
  series = {SocArXiv : open archive of the social sciences},
  journal   = {SocArXiv : open archive of the social sciences},
  publisher = {Center for Open Science},
  address   = {[Charlottesville, VA]},
  doi       = {10.31235/osf.io/k2zwh},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The digitization process has triggered a profound transformation of modern societies. It encompasses a broad spectrum of technical, social, political, cultural and economic developments related to the mass use of computer- and internet-based technologies. It is now becoming increasingly clear that digitization is also changing existing structures of social inequality and that new structures of digital inequality are emerging. This is shown by a growing number of recent individual studies. In this paper, we set ourselves the task of systematizing this new research within the framework of an empirically supported literature review. To do so, we use the PRISMA model for literature reviews and focus on three central dimensions of inequality - ethnicity, gender, and age - and their relevance within the discourse on digitization and inequality. The empirical basis consists of journal articles published between 2000 and 2020 and listed on the Web of Science, as well as an additional Google Scholar search, through which we attempt to include important monographs and contributions to edited volumes in our analyses. Our text corpus thus comprises a total of 281 articles. Empirically, our literature review shows that unequal access to digital resources largely reproduces existing structures of inequality; in some cases, studies report a reduction in social inequalities as a result of the digitization process.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WiesboeckVerwiebe2023,
  author    = {Wiesb{\"o}ck, Laura and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Sind Einkommensunterschiede zu groß?},
  series = {{\"O}sterreichische Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {{\"O}sterreichische Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1862-2585},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11614-023-00514-6},
  pages     = {53 -- 66},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Im Zentrum dieser Forschungsnotiz steht die Frage nach der Bewertung von Einkommensungleichheit in der {\"o}sterreichischen Gegenwartsgesellschaft. Anhand von ISSP- und SS{\"O}-Daten k{\"o}nnen unsere Analysen diesbez{\"u}glich zeigen, dass Einkommensungleichheit von einer großen Mehrheit aktuell als zu hoch wahrgenommen wird. Zudem sehen die Menschen in {\"O}sterreich sehr h{\"a}ufig den Staat in der Verantwortung Einkommensungleichheit abzubauen; viel h{\"a}ufiger als das in anderen europ{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern der Fall ist. W{\"a}hrend der Bereich Gesundheit und Pension seit Mitte der 1980er von der {\"u}berwiegenden Mehrheit als staatliche Aufgabe gesehen wurde, liegt die Verantwortung f{\"u}r den Abbau von Einkommensungleichheit auf einem niedrigeren Zustimmungsniveau. Die Bef{\"u}rwortung der Absicherung von Arbeitslosen als Verantwortung des Staats nimmt aktuell eher ab, trotz der gestiegenen Arbeitslosigkeit zu Beginn der Pandemie. Schließlich zeigen unsere Regressionsanalysen, dass Unterschiede in der Beurteilung von Einkommensungleichheiten u. a. durch sozio-demographische Faktoren, die berufliche Stellung, das Haushaltseinkommen aber auch durch pers{\"o}nliche Einstellungen und Gerechtigkeits{\"u}berzeugungen erkl{\"a}rt werden k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LiedlFritschSamperMejiaetal.2023,
  author    = {Liedl, Bernd and Fritsch, Nina-Sophie and Samper Mejia, Cristina and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Risk perceptions of individuals living in single-parent households during the COVID-19 crisis},
  series = {Frontiers in sociology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in sociology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2297-7775},
  doi       = {10.3389/fsoc.2023.1265302},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The COVID-19 crisis had severe social and economic impact on the life of most citizens around the globe. Individuals living in single-parent households were particularly at risk, revealing detrimental labour market outcomes and assessments of future perspectives marked by worries. As it has not been investigated yet, in this paper we study, how their perception about the future and their outlook on how the pandemic will affect them is related to their objective economic resources. Against this background, we examine the subjective risk perception of worsening living standards of individuals living in single-parent households compared to other household types, their objective economic situation based on the logarithmised equivalised disposable household incomes and analyse the relationship between those indicators. Using the German SOEP, including the SOEP-CoV survey from 2020, our findings based on regression modelling reveal that individuals living in single-parent households have been worse off during the pandemic, facing high economic insecurity. Path and interaction models support our assumption that the association between those indicators may not be that straightforward, as there are underlying mechanisms-such as mediation and moderation-of income affecting its direction and strength. With respect to our central hypotheses, our empirical findings point toward (1) a mediation effect, by demonstrating that the subjective risk perception of single-parent households can be partly explained by economic conditions. (2) The moderating effect suggests that the concrete position at the income distribution of households matters as well. While at the lower end of the income distribution, single-parent households reveal particularly worse risk perceptions during the pandemic, at the high end of the income spectrum, risk perceptions are similar for all household types. Thus, individuals living in single-parent households do not perceive higher risks of worsening living standards due to their household situation per se, but rather because they are worse off in terms of their economic situation compared to individuals living in other household types.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KohlerPost2023,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich and Post, Julia Charlotte},
  title     = {Pulp Science?},
  series = {Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik : GWP : Sozialwissenschaften f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  volume    = {72},
  journal   = {Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik : GWP : Sozialwissenschaften f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Budrich},
  address   = {Leverkusen},
  issn      = {2196-1654},
  doi       = {10.3224/gwp.v72i4.09},
  pages     = {475 -- 483},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ApeltKochMichalowskietal.2023,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Koch, Annika and Michalowski, Ines and Molzberger, Kaspar and Schenk, Liane and Schmidt, Max Oliver},
  title     = {How organisations regulate Muslim body practices},
  series = {Comparative migration studies},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Comparative migration studies},
  publisher = {European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations},
  address   = {Utrecht},
  issn      = {2214-594X},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40878-023-00355-y},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In a comparison of three human service organisations in which the human body plays a key role, we examine how organisations regulate religious body practices. We concentrate on Muslim norms of dressing and undressing as a potential focal point of cultural and religious diversity. Inspired by Ray's (2019) idea of racialized organizations, we assume that state-run organizations in Germany are characterized by a strong commitment to religious tolerance and non-discrimination but also marked by anti- Muslim sentiment prevalent among the German population. Our study looks for mechanism that explain how Human Service Organizations accommodate Muslim body practices. It draws on qualitative empirical data collected in state-run hospitals, schools and swimming pools in Germany. Our analyses show that the organizations draw on formal and informal rules at the organizational level to accommodate Islam. We identify five general organizational mechanisms that may hinder Muslim accommodation in human service organizations. In particular, we see a risk of decoupling between the expectation of religious tolerance and processes that lead to informal discrimination, driven mainly by the difficulty of controlling group dynamics among users.},
  language  = {en}
}