@incollection{HennemannMeisnitzer2022, author = {Hennemann, Anja and Meisnitzer, Benjamin}, title = {An introduction to contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages}, series = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages}, booktitle = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages}, publisher = {Heidelberg}, address = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter}, isbn = {978-3-8253-4936-3}, pages = {7 -- 13}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{HasslerBoehmHennemann2017, author = {Haßler, Gerda and B{\"o}hm, Ver{\´o}nica Julia and Hennemann, Anja}, title = {On the evidential use of English adverbials and their equivalents in Romance languages and Russian}, series = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (Pragmatics \& Beyond New Series ; 271)}, volume = {271}, booktitle = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (Pragmatics \& Beyond New Series ; 271)}, editor = {Mar{\´i}n Arrese, Juana I. and Haßler, Gerda and Carretero, Marta}, publisher = {John Benjamins}, address = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia}, isbn = {9789027256768}, issn = {0922-842X}, doi = {10.1075/pbns.271.04boh}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {87 -- 104}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The present study investigates the use of equivalents of the English adverbials seemingly and apparently with a specific morphological structure in Romance languages and Russian, i.e. Spanish al parecer, Portuguese ao parecer and ao que parece, French avoir l'air de, Italian all'apparenza and in apparenza as well as Russian по-видимому. The underlying hypothesis is that the function and syntactic behaviour of these adverbial locutions are motivated by their morphological composition. It is to investigate whether the adverbials may be used sentence-initially, parenthetically, as an adverbial with broad or narrow scope or as a component of a modalised predication. The adverbial locutions are treated as means of expression where evidentiality and epistemic modality represent overlapping functional-semantic categories.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2022, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Aspectual periphrases in Romance languages in contact with the English progressive form}, series = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages}, booktitle = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-8253-4936-3}, pages = {215 -- 229}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2016, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Deg{\´e}rando's three prize essays and the shift in linguistic thought at the turn of the 19th century}, series = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)}, booktitle = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)}, publisher = {John Benjamins Publishing Company}, address = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia}, isbn = {978-90-272-4617-2}, issn = {0304-0720}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {149 -- 160}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Deg{\´e}rando started out from the views of the French ideologists on the relationship of language and thought, but increasingly distanced himself from them. This is already evident based on the choice of reference authors and also on the increasing emphasis on empirical research. His prize essays reflect the fundamental changes in linguistic thought during the late 18th century. He was successful in the competition of the Institut National (1797/1799) and with another essay at the Berlin Academy (1802). His main argument against Condillac and the ideologists is that empirical knowledge does not depend on signs. Therefore, the development of better languages will not improve this kind of human knowledge.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Arbitrariness, Motivation and Value of the Linguistic Sign: Saussurean and Post-Saussurean Perspectives}, series = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s}, booktitle = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s}, editor = {Rico, Christophe and Kirtchuk, Pablo}, publisher = {Polis Institute Press}, address = {Jerusalem}, isbn = {978-9-65769-811-2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {61 -- 87}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In 1916, three years after the death of Ferdinand de Saussure, the Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale (CLG) was published in Geneva. This foundational work marked the beginning of a discipline that has profoundly influenced the development of the humanities ever since. What sources influenced the CLG? Do the main concepts of this seminal work have the same validity today as they did in 1916? How has the recent development of language sciences influenced its reception? How does this text account for meaning and communication within the context of speech (parole)? In order to explore these questions, one hundred years after the publication of Ferdinand de Saussure's seminal work on General Linguistics, Polis--The Jerusalem Institute of Languages and Humanities held an interdisciplinary conference that gathered 14 international specialists from various disciplines: general linguistics, pragmatics, philology, dialectology, translation studies, terminology, and philosophy. The first section of this work reassesses the sources and further influence of the CLG on modern linguistics. The book's second part discusses some of the main concepts and dichotomies of the CLG (constitution of the linguistic method, arbitrariness of sign, main dichotomies), under the light of both the original manuscripts and recent linguistic developments (influence of dialectology or translation studies). The third and last part handles the pragmatic and semantic dimensions of language, suggesting new avenues of reflection that could not yet have been fully taken into account within the CLG itself. Uniting 14 scholarly articles, together with an introduction, an index locorum and a collective bibliography, this volume hopes to encourage readers with its reappraisal and reinterpretation of Saussure's ground-breaking work and thus contribute to the future development of linguistics and humanities.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Ette2019, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Pride and conviviality - pride in conviviality}, series = {Taking Stock - Twenty-Five Years of Comparative Literary Research (Internationale Forschungen zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft)}, volume = {200}, booktitle = {Taking Stock - Twenty-Five Years of Comparative Literary Research (Internationale Forschungen zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft)}, publisher = {Brill Rodopi}, address = {Leiden [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-90-04-41035-0}, issn = {0929-6999}, doi = {10.1163/9789004410350_006}, pages = {121 -- 155}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Pride is linked to conviviality, to the practice of life-with-an-other, and to an awareness of the limitations of the life forms and life norms which guide and regulate the life of culturally, socially, and historically defined communities. Assuming this link, pride in living-together and conviviality appear as concepts creating a framework for future perspectives. But these concepts need a space in which they can unfold critically and confidently with a view to the future. For millennia, the literatures of the world have created this space of simulation and experimentation in which knowledge of how-to-live-with-an-other has been put down on paper through the open-ended tradition of writing. It is the space of the life forms and life norms of conviviality: it offers us prospective knowledge for the future by translating the imaginable into the thinkable, and the readable into the livable.}, language = {en} } @incollection{BoehmHennemannMeisnitzer2022, author = {B{\"o}hm, Ver{\´o}nica Julia and Hennemann, Anja and Meisnitzer, Benjamin}, title = {Language contact and the linguistic coding of evidentiality in varieties of Spanish in Latin America}, series = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages}, booktitle = {Linguistic hybridity: contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance languages}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-8253-4936-3}, pages = {117 -- 142}, year = {2022}, language = {en} }