@article{Heidt2022, author = {Heidt, Irene}, title = {Fostering critical language teacher education through autoethnography}, series = {Standortbestimmungen in der Fremdsprachenforschung}, journal = {Standortbestimmungen in der Fremdsprachenforschung}, editor = {Wilden, Eva and Alfes, Luisa and Cantone-Altintas, Katja F. and {\c{C}}{\i}kr{\i}k{\c{c}}{\i}, Sevgi and Reimann, Daniel}, publisher = {WBV}, address = {Bielefeld}, isbn = {978-3-7639-7304-0}, doi = {10.3278/9783763973057}, pages = {228 -- 243}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @article{HeidtFreitagHild2023, author = {Heidt, Irene and Freitag-Hild, Britta}, title = {Critical global citizenship education in the EFL classroom}, series = {Rethinking Cultural Learning: Cosmopolitan Perspectives on Language Education}, journal = {Rethinking Cultural Learning: Cosmopolitan Perspectives on Language Education}, editor = {R{\"o}mhild, Ricardo and Marxl, Anika and Matz, Frauke and Siepmann, Philipp}, publisher = {Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier}, address = {Trier}, isbn = {978-3-98940-005-4}, pages = {99 -- 114}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The objective of the present paper is to explore the potentials and challenges inherent in con- ceptualizations of global citizenship education (GCE) in the context of foreign language edu- cation. Specifically, we argue for a critical approach to GCE that emphasizes the significance of language as symbolic power by drawing on the concepts of critical literacy (e.g., Freire 1983; Janks 2014) and symbolic competence (Kramsch 2006; 2011; 2021). To illustrate the necessity of such a critical approach to GCE, we critically analyze teaching materials designed for the English language classroom as provided by the curriculum framework (KMK/ BMZ 2016). The analysis reveals how reliance on dominant Western liberal and neoliberal epistemologies, norms, and discourses might inadvertently reinforce the very inequalities that GCE actually seeks to address. By foregrounding the relationship between language, symbolic power, and GCE, we further redesign these teaching materials and incorporate pedagogical and methodological principles which are in line with a critical literacy and symbolic competence.}, language = {en} } @article{Adamik2022, author = {Adamik, Verena}, title = {Alien Horrors}, series = {The Aliens Within : danger, disease, and displacement in representations of the racialized poor}, journal = {The Aliens Within : danger, disease, and displacement in representations of the racialized poor}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-078974-4}, issn = {0340-5435}, doi = {10.1515/9783110789799-006}, pages = {113 -- 131}, year = {2022}, abstract = {H. P. Lovecraft's oeuvre abounds with stereotypes of the racialized poor. As scholars have noted, Lovecraft's work turns those he viewed as 'Others' into 'aliens.' Poor people of color (as opposed to the orderly White rural population and White working class) in Lovecraft's stories are foreign, diseased, and criminal, and they threaten social and cosmic orders as they are in league with a nebulous entity that waits to wreak indescribable havoc. This chapter analyzes three 'Lovecraftian' novels published in 2016 - Cassandra Khaw's Hammers on Bone,Victor LaValle's The Ballad of Black Tom, and Matt Ruff's Lovecraft Country. These works elucidate the connection of Trump's 2016 rhetoric in campaign and presidential speeches and the White supremacist imagery used by Lovecraft. In these novels, the racialized poor have a special connection to an astronomical, evil entity {\`a} la Lovecraft. As carriers of numinous genes or parasitic entities (literally having 'an alien within') they become empowered. They thus occupy a pivotal position in forestalling or bringing about the destruction of societal order; that is, of White supremacy. Exploring the alleged risk posed by this 'underclass,' these works seem to foretell current representations of protesters as 'riotous mobs' that threaten the body politic Trump sought to make great (and White) again.}, language = {en} } @article{Adamik2021, author = {Adamik, Verena}, title = {From Utopian Island to global empire}, series = {Utopian Studies}, volume = {31}, journal = {Utopian Studies}, number = {3}, publisher = {Penn State University Press}, address = {University Park, Pa}, doi = {doi: 10.5325/utopianstudies.31.3.0457}, pages = {457 -- 474}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This article discusses how Alex Garland's The Beach (1996) engages with conceptions of utopian islands, nation, and colonialism in modernity and how it, from this basis, develops a different spatiality that reflects on a more deterritorialized form of imperial domination within late twentieth-century globalization, as exercised by the United States. The novel is shown to subvert, but not to abolish, two spatial formations that originated in early modernity: nation and utopia. Building on Jean Baudrillard's elaborations regarding simulation and simulacra, the article argues that The Beach creates a hyperreal narrative that does away with the idea of isolated, bounded spaces and that in form and content corresponds with the worldwide dominance of the United States at the end of the twentieth century.}, language = {en} } @article{KolbeHannaWischer2021, author = {Kolbe-Hanna, Daniela and Wischer, Ilse}, title = {Introduction}, series = {Anglistik: Focus on English Linguistics: Varieties Meet Histories}, volume = {32}, journal = {Anglistik: Focus on English Linguistics: Varieties Meet Histories}, number = {1}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {2625-2147}, doi = {10.33675/ANGL/2021/1/4}, pages = {5 -- 10}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @article{BrilmyerTrentinXiang2019, author = {Brilmyer, S. Pearl and Trentin, Filippo and Xiang, Zairong}, title = {The ontology of the couple or, what queer theory knows about numbers}, series = {GLQ- A journal of lesbian and gay studies}, volume = {25}, journal = {GLQ- A journal of lesbian and gay studies}, number = {2}, publisher = {Duke University Press}, address = {Durham}, issn = {1064-2684}, doi = {10.1215/10642684-7367717}, pages = {223 -- 255}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @article{Schenck2020, author = {Schenck, Marcia C.}, title = {Small Strangers at the School of Friendship}, series = {German Historical Institute Bulletin: German Historical Institute Washington Bulletin}, volume = {2020}, journal = {German Historical Institute Bulletin: German Historical Institute Washington Bulletin}, number = {15: Histories of Migrant Knowledge: Transatlantic and Global Perspectives}, publisher = {German Historical Institute}, address = {Washington}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-494614}, pages = {41 -- 59}, year = {2020}, abstract = {"Why," Francisca Isidro wonders, "did we have to leave our families and move so far away, only to come back as cooks, waitresses, sales assistants, and the like?" And she recalls: "We came back from our time in East Germany with professions that were not held in particu-larly high regard in Mozambique. Nobody understood why we didn't return as engineers, doctors and teachers. 'A waitress?,' they would wonder. 'Why, they could have become a waitress in Mozambique. Nobody needs to spend so many years in school for that.'"2And with that, Ms. Isidro puts her fi nger right on a misapprehension at the heart of an ambitious state-led education migration program that saw 900 Mozambican children attend the School of Friendship (Schule der Freundschaft , SdF) in Staßfurt in the district of Magdeburg, in what today is Saxony-Anhalt, in the German Democratic Republic (GDR, or East Germany) from 1982 to 1988.3 Ms. Isidro returned to Mozambique as a trained salesperson for clothing, a profession she neither chose nor ever worked in again subsequently. Like her, these 900 children had to navigate the diverging values that particular environments bestowed upon knowledge. What they learned was interpreted diff erently in their home communities, at the SdF, and in their German host families}, language = {en} } @article{Boesel2018, author = {B{\"o}sel, Bernd}, title = {Affect Disposition(ing)}, series = {Media and Communication}, volume = {6}, journal = {Media and Communication}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cogitatio Press}, address = {Lissabon}, doi = {10.17645/mac.v6i3.1460}, pages = {15 -- 21}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The "affective turn" has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several "affect disposition(ing) regimes"—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler's concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events.}, language = {en} } @article{Wiemann2014, author = {Wiemann, Dirk}, title = {A Little Piece of the Shire}, series = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift}, volume = {2014}, journal = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift}, number = {95}, editor = {Lange, Bernd-Peter and Bartels, Anke}, pages = {24 -- 27}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{Gunnarsson2014, author = {Gunnarsson, Logi}, title = {In defense of ambivalence and alienation}, series = {Ethical theory and moral practice}, volume = {17}, journal = {Ethical theory and moral practice}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1386-2820}, doi = {10.1007/s10677-013-9464-x}, pages = {13 -- 26}, year = {2014}, language = {en} }