@misc{LoeckmannSchneider2022,
  author    = {L{\"o}ckmann, Teresa and Schneider, Matthias},
  title     = {Geschlechtergerechtigkeit im Verbraucher_innenschutz?},
  series = {Genderblog},
  journal   = {Genderblog},
  publisher = {Zentrum f{\"u}r transdisziplin{\"a}re Geschlechterstudien an der Humboldt-Universit{\"a}t zu Berlin},
  address   = {Berlin},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Dosdall2022,
  author    = {Dosdall, Henrik},
  title     = {Wie algorithmische Technologien wirksam werden},
  series = {VERSUS : Magazin f{\"u}r kritische Organisationspraxis},
  journal   = {VERSUS : Magazin f{\"u}r kritische Organisationspraxis},
  publisher = {Metaplan® - Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Planung und Organisation mbH},
  address   = {Quickborn},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Im Digitalisierungsdiskurs dominiert die Vorstellung, algorithmische Technologien {\"a}nderten Organisationen fundamental. Demgegen{\"u}ber argumentiert der Artikel, dass die Wirkm{\"a}chtigkeit algorithmischer Technologien davon abh{\"a}ngt, wie Organisationen sie in ihre Entscheidungs­architektur einbinden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{OhlertBoos2020,
  author    = {Ohlert, Clemens and Boos, Pauline},
  title     = {Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf Geschlechterungleichheiten},
  series = {Arbeit},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Arbeit},
  number    = {3-4},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0941-5025},
  doi       = {10.1515/arbeit-2020-0015},
  pages     = {195 -- 218},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Ausgehend von der Debatte um die Genderaspekte der Digitalisierung der Arbeit untersuchen wir den Zusammenhang zwischen der Nutzung digitaler Technologien und der Entwicklung von Geschlechterungleichheiten empirisch. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Frauen in Branchen mit hohem Digitalisierungsgrad unterrepr{\"a}sentiert sind und dass sich diese Dimension der Geschlechtersegregation in den letzten Jahren verst{\"a}rkte. Die Unterrepr{\"a}sentation von Frauen in Branchen mit hohem Digitalisierungsgrad geht mit Nachteilen bei den Verdiensten einher. Die Ergebnisse zeigen zudem, dass der Gender Pay Gap in Branchen mit hohem Digitalisierungsgrad tendenziell gr{\"o}ßer ist und {\"u}ber die Zeit weniger zur{\"u}ckging als in Branchen, in denen weniger digitale Technologien genutzt werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BaumgartMuster2023,
  author    = {Baumgart, Lene and Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Organization not found},
  series = {Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r angewandte Organisationspsychologie},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r angewandte Organisationspsychologie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {2366-6145},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11612-023-00681-w},
  pages     = {177 -- 185},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Der Beitrag in der Zeitschrift GIO besch{\"a}ftigt sich mit der Frage nach den Schwierigkeiten von Digitalisierungsreformen in {\"o}ffentlichen Verwaltungen. Der Blick wird daf{\"u}r auf Verwaltungen als Organisationen gerichtet, deren formale Strukturen die Digitalisierungsreform erschweren, da steile Hierarchien und Dienstwegeregelungen mit netzwerkartigen Projektstrukturen konfligieren, agile Arbeitsweisen der Orientierung an rechtlich legitimierten Verfahren zuwiderlaufen und das Personal nicht mit den n{\"o}tigen Kompetenzen ausgestattet wird. Der organisationssensible Fokus erlaubt es, nicht nur die Probleme der Strukturen zu betrachten, sondern auch deren Funktionen f{\"u}r den Systembestand von Verwaltungen zu ber{\"u}cksichtigen. So wird gezeigt, dass etwa Dienstwegeregelungen demokratische Prozesse gew{\"a}hrleisten und Verantwortungsdiffusion verhindern, ihre Rechtsorientierung den Verwaltungen Legitimation und Autonomie verschafft und das Personal durch seine Regeleinhaltung funktionierende Verfahren und Objektivit{\"a}t gew{\"a}hrleistet. Diese Spannungsfelder ber{\"u}cksichtigend, wird daher der Vorschlag gemacht, in Reformen nicht nur ihre Optimierungsfunktion zu sehen, sondern sie als Werkzeug f{\"u}r ein besseres Verst{\"a}ndnis der vorherrschenden Strukturen zu nutzen. Der Beitrag gibt abschließend Fragen an die Hand, wie man sich diesem Verst{\"a}ndnis n{\"a}hern kann.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Baumgart2023,
  author    = {Baumgart, Lene},
  title     = {New work - old problem?},
  series = {Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1618-808X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11613-023-00811-9},
  pages     = {181 -- 194},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Die Nutzung digitaler Kollaborationstools wird als Vorausset- zung f{\"u}r eine postb{\"u}rokratische New Work-Welt erachtet. Organisationale Digita- lisierungsprojekte zur Einf{\"u}hrung solcher Kollaborationssoftware sind selbst post- b{\"u}rokratisch strukturiert, d. h. sie arbeiten in crossfunktionalen und selbstorgani- sierten Teams. W{\"a}hrend der Kooperation mit anderen Organisationseinheiten treten Konflikte auf, die sich dadurch versch{\"a}rfen, dass sie nicht von der Hierarchie ge- l{\"o}st werden k{\"o}nnen, sondern im Sinne von New Work demokratisch ausgehandelt werden m{\"u}ssen. In der Folge bedarf es alternativer formaler Strukturen, die diese Herausforderung bew{\"a}ltigen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Kunkel2023,
  author    = {Kunkel, Stefanie},
  title     = {Green industry through industry 4.0? Expected and observed effects of digitalisation in industry for environmental sustainability},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-61395},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-613954},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {vii, 168},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Digitalisation in industry - also called "Industry 4.0" - is seen by numerous actors as an opportunity to reduce the environmental impact of the industrial sector. The scientific assessments of the effects of digitalisation in industry on environmental sustainability, however, are ambivalent. This cumulative dissertation uses three empirical studies to examine the expected and observed effects of digitalisation in industry on environmental sustainability. The aim of this dissertation is to identify opportunities and risks of digitalisation at different system levels and to derive options for action in politics and industry for a more sustainable design of digitalisation in industry. I use an interdisciplinary, socio-technical approach and look at selected countries of the Global South (Study 1) and the example of China (all studies). In the first study (section 2, joint work with Marcel Matthess), I use qualitative content analysis to examine digital and industrial policies from seven different countries in Africa and Asia for expectations regarding the impact of digitalisation on sustainability and compare these with the potentials of digitalisation for sustainability in the respective country contexts. The analysis reveals that the documents express a wide range of vague expectations that relate more to positive indirect impacts of information and communication technology (ICT) use, such as improved energy efficiency and resource management, and less to negative direct impacts of ICT, such as electricity consumption through ICT. In the second study (section 3, joint work with Marcel Matthess, Grischa Beier and Bing Xue), I conduct and analyse interviews with 18 industry representatives of the electronics industry from Europe, Japan and China on digitalisation measures in supply chains using qualitative content analysis. I find that while there are positive expectations regarding the effects of digital technologies on supply chain sustainability, their actual use and observable effects are still limited. Interview partners can only provide few examples from their own companies which show that sustainability goals have already been pursued through digitalisation of the supply chain or where sustainability effects, such as resource savings, have been demonstrably achieved. In the third study (section 4, joint work with Peter Neuh{\"a}usler, Melissa Dachrodt and Marcel Matthess), I conduct an econometric panel data analysis. I examine the relationship between the degree of Industry 4.0, energy consumption and energy intensity in ten manufacturing sectors in China between 2006 and 2019. The results suggest that overall, there is no significant relationship between the degree of Industry 4.0 and energy consumption or energy intensity in manufacturing sectors in China. However, differences can be found in subgroups of sectors. I find a negative correlation of Industry 4.0 and energy intensity in highly digitalised sectors, indicating an efficiency-enhancing effect of Industry 4.0 in these sectors. On the other hand, there is a positive correlation of Industry 4.0 and energy consumption for sectors with low energy consumption, which could be explained by the fact that digitalisation, such as the automation of previously mainly labour-intensive sectors, requires energy and also induces growth effects. In the discussion section (section 6) of this dissertation, I use the classification scheme of the three levels macro, meso and micro, as well as of direct and indirect environmental effects to classify the empirical observations into opportunities and risks, for example, with regard to the probability of rebound effects of digitalisation at the three levels. I link the investigated actor perspectives (policy makers, industry representatives), statistical data and additional literature across the system levels and consider political economy aspects to suggest fields of action for more sustainable (digitalised) industries. The dissertation thus makes two overarching contributions to the academic and societal discourse. First, my three empirical studies expand the limited state of research at the interface between digitalisation in industry and sustainability, especially by considering selected countries in the Global South and the example of China. Secondly, exploring the topic through data and methods from different disciplinary contexts and taking a socio-technical point of view, enables an analysis of (path) dependencies, uncertainties, and interactions in the socio-technical system across different system levels, which have often not been sufficiently considered in previous studies. The dissertation thus aims to create a scientifically and practically relevant knowledge basis for a value-guided, sustainability-oriented design of digitalisation in industry.},
  language  = {en}
}