@misc{Spiegel2020,
  author    = {Spiegel, Thomas J.},
  title     = {Errata zu: Spiegel, Thomas Jussuf: Ist der Naturalismus eine Ideologie? - (Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung. -68 (2020), 1. - S. 51 -71. - DOI: 10.1515/dzph-2020-0003)},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {68},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2020-8888},
  pages     = {492 -- 493},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Kraemer2019,
  author    = {Kr{\"a}mer, Felicitas},
  title     = {Perspectives on embryo donation},
  series = {Bioethics},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {Bioethics},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0269-9702},
  doi       = {10.1111/bioe.12636},
  pages     = {634 -- 636},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{HaagHoeppner2019,
  author    = {Haag, Johannes and Hoeppner, Till},
  title     = {Errata zu: Denken und Welt - Wege kritischer Metaphysik. dzph. Band 67, 2019, Heft 1, S. 76-97},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {67},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2019-0888},
  pages     = {326 -- 327},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {We begin by considering two common ways of conceiving critical metaphysics. According to the first (and polemical) conception, critical metaphysics analyzes nothing more than the form of thought and thereby misses the proper point of metaphysics, namely to investigate the form of reality. According to the second (and affirmative) conception, critical metaphysics starts from the supposed insight that the form of reality can't be other than the form of thought and is thus not required to analyze anything but that form. We argue that the first conception is too weak while the second is too strong. Then we sketch an alternative conception of critical metaphysics, a conception we find expressed both in Kant's B-Deduction and in the way Barry Stroud has recently investigated the possibility of metaphysics. According to such a conception, a properly critical metaphysics needs to proceed in two steps: first, it needs to analyze the most general and necessary form of any thought that is about an objective reality at all; second, it needs to investigate how that form of thought relates to the reality it purports to represent. But unlike Kant, Stroud remains sceptical regarding the possibility of a satisfying transition from thought to reality in metaphysics. We argue that this dissatisfaction can be traced back to a notion of objectivity and reality in terms of complete mind-independence. Then we sketch an alternative notion of objectivity and reality in terms of distinctness from subjects and acts of thinking, and argue that it is that notion that allows Kant, with his Transcendental Idealism, to make the transition required for any satisfying metaphysics, namely that from the form of thought to reality.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Gruene2016,
  author    = {Gr{\"u}ne, Stefanie},
  title     = {Allais on Intuitions and the Objective Reality of the Categories},
  series = {European journal of philosophy},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {European journal of philosophy},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0966-8373},
  doi       = {10.1111/ejop.12139},
  pages     = {241 -- 252},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DemmerlingKruegerHabermas2016,
  author    = {Demmerling, Christoph and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Habermas, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Communicative Reason Juergen Habermas, interviewed by Christoph Demmerling and Hans-Peter Krueger},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2016-0061},
  pages     = {806 -- 827},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Jurgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation.},
  language  = {de}
}