@article{FuhrmeisterMadecLorenzetal.2022, author = {Fuhrmeister, Pamela and Madec, Sylvain and Lorenz, Antje and Elbuy, Shereen and B{\"u}rki Foschini, Audrey Damaris}, title = {Behavioural and EEG evidence for inter-individual variability in late encoding stages of word production}, series = {Language, cognition and neuroscience}, volume = {37}, journal = {Language, cognition and neuroscience}, number = {7}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {2327-3798}, doi = {10.1080/23273798.2022.2030483}, pages = {902 -- 924}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Individuals differ in the time needed to name a picture. This contribution asks whether this inter-individual variability emerges in earlier stages of word production (e.g. lexical selection) or later stages (e.g. articulation) and examines the consequences of this variability for EEG group results. We measured participants' (N = 45) naming latencies and continuous EEG in a picture-word interference task and naming latencies in a delayed naming task. Inter-individual variability in naming latencies in immediate naming (in contrast with inter-item variability) was not larger than the variability in the delayed task, suggesting that some variability in immediate naming originates in later stages of word production. EEG data complemented this interpretation: Differences between relatively fast vs. slow speakers emerged in response-aligned analyses in a time window close to the vocal response. We additionally present a method to assess the generalisability of the timing of effects across participants based on random sampling.}, language = {en} } @article{LorenzHeideBurchert2014, author = {Lorenz, Antje and Heide, Judith and Burchert, Frank}, title = {Compound naming in aphasia: effects of complexity, part of speech, and semantic transparency}, series = {Language, cognition and neuroscience}, volume = {29}, journal = {Language, cognition and neuroscience}, number = {1}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {2327-3798}, doi = {10.1080/01690965.2013.766357}, pages = {88 -- 106}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{EtzienMachlebLorenz2011, author = {Etzien, Maria and Machleb, Franziska and Lorenz, Antje}, title = {Semantische versus wortform-spezifische Merkmalsanalyse in der Behandlung von Wortabrufst{\"o}rungen bei Aphasie}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{LorenzZiegler2009, author = {Lorenz, Antje and Ziegler, Wolfram}, title = {Semantic vs. word-form specific techniques in anomia treatment : a multiple single-case study}, issn = {0911-6044}, doi = {10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.05.003}, year = {2009}, abstract = {This study compared a semantic and a phonological/orthographic approach to the treatment of word-finding difficulties in a case-series of ten individuals with aphasia, using a cross-over design. The study aims to investigate whether one approach is generally more effective than the other or whether the effectiveness of the two treatments relates systematically to the nature of the underlying functional impairment within the frarnework of a modular single- word processing model. In both treatments, the main task was spoken naming of pictured objects with different types of cues. In the semantic approach, different aspects of the target semantic concept were used as a cue in picture naming, while in the word-form method, both phonological and orthographic information were provided as a cue. Treatment effects were assessed in terms of both short- and long-lasting effects on spoken picture naming accuracy in each participant after the end of each treatment phase. Here, both item-specific effects and a possible generalisation to untreated pictures were considered. In addition, the immediate effects of the phonological and the semantic prompts were analysed. With regard to the cue effects on immediate naming, the word-form specific cues proved stronger than the semantic cues. The semantic treatment phase on the other hand, produced more stable effects than the word-form specific phase in some participants. A direct relationship between specific treatment effects and underlying functional deficit pattern was not confirmed for all subjects, i.e. participants with post-semantic anomia benefited from the semantic approach and participants with semantic anomia benefited from the phonological/orthographic approach. In the discussion of the results different explanations are considered, including the importance of preserved functions which aphasic participants bring into the treatment, the possible acquisition of a conscious strategy, and the possible influence of order of treatment. The effects of the two treatments are interpreted with regard to their underlying functional mechanisms in a single-word processing model.}, language = {en} } @article{SchroederStadiePostleretal.2005, author = {Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Stadie, Nicole and Postler, Jenny and Lorenz, Antje and Swoboda-Moll, Maria and Burchert, Frank and De Bleser, Ria}, title = {Does training-induced improvement of noncanonical sentence production in agrammatic aphasia generalize to comprehension? : a multiple single case study}, issn = {0093-934X}, year = {2005}, language = {en} } @article{RathHeideLorenzetal.2015, author = {Rath, Elisa and Heide, Judith and Lorenz, Antje and Wartenburger, Isabell}, title = {Kompositaverarbeitung bei prim{\"a}r progressiver Aphasie}, series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik (Band 8) - Schwerpunktthema: Besonders behandeln? : Sprachtherapie im Rahmen prim{\"a}rer St{\"o}rungsbilder}, journal = {Spektrum Patholinguistik (Band 8) - Schwerpunktthema: Besonders behandeln? : Sprachtherapie im Rahmen prim{\"a}rer St{\"o}rungsbilder}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-79821}, pages = {151 -- 171}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @misc{AktasSuccowGieletal.2015, author = {Aktas, Maren and Succow, Juliane and Giel, Barbara and Dressel, Katharina and Lange, Inga and Hanne, Sandra and Burchert, Frank and Vasishth, Shravan and Schwytay, Jeannine and Breitenstein, Sarah and Fleischhauer, Elisabeth and Baumann, Jeannine and Preisinger, Irmhild and Siegm{\"u}ller, Julia and Kuschmann, Anja and Ebert, Susanne and Lowit, Anja and Rath, Elisa and Heide, Judith and Lorenz, Antje and Wartenburger, Isabell and Hippeli, Carolin and Rausch, Monika and W{\"u}rzner, Kay-Michael and Schroeder, Sascha and Czapka, Sophia and Klassert, Annegret and Reuters, Sabine and Frank, Ulrike and Frank, Katrin and Zimmermann, Heinrich and Peiffers, Sabine and Thonicke, Mady}, title = {Spektrum Patholinguistik = Schwerpunktthema: Besonders behandeln? : Sprachtherapie im Rahmen prim{\"a}rer St{\"o}rungsbilder}, number = {8}, editor = {Adelt, Anne and Otto, Constanze and Fritzsche, Tom and Magister, Caroline}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, organization = {Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e. V. (vpl)}, isbn = {978-3-86956-335-0}, issn = {1869-3822}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-7714}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-77147}, pages = {vii, 247}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Das 8. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema "Besonders behandeln? Sprachtherapie im Rahmen prim{\"a}rer St{\"o}rungsbilder" fand am 15.11.2014 in Potsdam statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die vier Hauptvortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema, die vier Kurzvortr{\"a}ge aus dem Spektrum Patholinguisitk sowie die Beitr{\"a}ge der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis.}, language = {de} } @article{EtzienMachlebLorenz2011, author = {Etzien, Maria and Machleb, Franziska and Lorenz, Antje}, title = {Semantische versus wortform-spezifische Merkmalsanalyse in der Behandlung von Wortabrufst{\"o}rungen bei Aphasie}, series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik}, journal = {Spektrum Patholinguistik}, number = {4}, issn = {1869-3822}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-54337}, pages = {193 -- 197}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @misc{CostardStadieRitteretal.2011, author = {Costard, Sylvia and Stadie, Nicole and Ritter, Christiane and Moll, Kristina and Landerl, Karin and Kohnen, Saskia and Kentner, Gerrit and Bethmann, Anja and Scheich, Henning and Brechmann, Andr{\´e} and De Kok, D{\"o}rte and Berger, Frauke and Sticher, Heike and Czepluch, Christine and M{\"a}tzener, Flurina and Wilmes, Stefanie and Hadert, Sandra and Frank, Ulrike and M{\"a}der, Mark and Westermann, Antje and Meinusch, Miriam and Neumann, Sandra and D{\"u}sterh{\"o}ft, Stefanie and Posse, Dorothea and Puritz, Caroline and Seidl, Rainer Ottis and Etzien, Maria and Machleb, Franziska and Lorenz, Antje and H{\"o}ger, Maria and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Busch, Tobias and Heide, Judith and Tagoe, Tanja and Watermeyer, Melanie and H{\"o}hle, Barbara and Kauschke, Christina}, title = {Spektrum Patholinguistik = Schwerpunktthema: Lesen lernen: Diagnostik und Therapie bei St{\"o}rungen des Leseerwerbs}, number = {4}, editor = {Hanne, Sandra and Fritzsche, Tom and Ott, Susan and Adelt, Anne}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, organization = {Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e. V. (vpl)}, isbn = {978-3-86956-145-5}, issn = {1869-3822}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-5155}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-53146}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Am 20. November 2010 fand an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam das 4. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik statt. Die Konferenzreihe wird regelm{\"a}ßig seit 2007 vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband ver{\"o}ffentlicht die Hauptvortr{\"a}ge des Herbsttreffens zum Thema "Lesen lernen: Diagnostik und Therapie bei St{\"o}rungen des Leseerwerbs". Des Weiteren sind die Beitr{\"a}ge promovierender bzw. promovierter PatholinguistInnen sowie der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen enthalten.}, language = {de} } @article{Lorenz2008, author = {Lorenz, Antje}, title = {Die Verarbeitung von Nominalkomposita bei Aphasie}, series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik}, journal = {Spektrum Patholinguistik}, number = {1}, issn = {1866-9085}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-18932}, pages = {67 -- 81}, year = {2008}, abstract = {Auszug: In der psycho- und neurolinguistischen Morphologieforschung wird die Frage behandelt, wie polymorphematische W{\"o}rter, d. h. W{\"o}rter, die aus mehr als einem Morphem bestehen (z. B. Apfel-baum; Be-mal-ung, mal-e), im mentalen Lexikon repr{\"a}sentiert sind und wie sie verarbeitet werden. Spielt die interne morphologische Wortstruktur dabei {\"u}berhaupt eine Rolle oder sind solche W{\"o}rter ganzheitlich repr{\"a}sentiert? Die beiden großen konkurrierenden Theorien zur Verarbeitung polymorphematischer W{\"o}rter sind die Dekompositionshypothese und die Auflistungshypothese. Nach der Dekompositionshypothese werden morphologisch komplexe W{\"o}rter bei der rezeptiven Worterkennung in ihre Einzelteile aufgespalten (dekomponiert), beim expressiven Wortabruf m{\"u}ssen die zugrunde liegenden Morpheme einzeln vom Lexikon abgerufen und zu einer Vollform zusammengesetzt (komponiert) werden (z. B. Taft \& Forster 1976). Im Unterschied dazu besagt die Auflistungshypothese, dass komplexe W{\"o}rter als Vollformen im Lexikon repr{\"a}sentiert sind und abgerufen werden (Butterworth 1983). Wortbildungsregeln kommen nach der Dekompositionshypothese also grunds{\"a}tzlich zum Einsatz, w{\"a}hrend nach der Auflistungshypothese morphologische Prozesse nur bei der Verarbeitung von unbekannten Vollformen oder bei der Bildung neuer Vollformen ablaufen. [...]}, language = {de} }