@article{FilserTiberiusKrausetal.2020,
  author    = {Filser, Matthias and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha and Zeitlhofer, Tanita and Kailer, Norbert and M{\"u}ller, Adrian},
  title     = {Opportunity recognition},
  series = {Entrepreneurship research journal},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Entrepreneurship research journal},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2194-6175},
  doi       = {10.1515/erj-2020-0124},
  pages     = {1 -- 30},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper provides an overview of the ever-increasing literature on opportunity recognition, with a focus on its antecedents and determinants. With a two-step research approach, a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review, we structure the current research in this field. By using bibliometric techniques, we analyzed 161 publications and, consequently, clustered the 30 most influential references. Apart from economic theories and the role of opportunity recognition in entrepreneurship, a strong research focus is on antecedents of opportunity recognition. Therefore, in our subsequent literature review, we focus on determinants which influence opportunity recognition. We find that the opportunity recognition process is influenced by various personal, organizational and environmental factors. We conclude with a research outlook for future research opportunities on opportunity recognition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KhawAlnoorAlAbrrowetal.2022,
  author    = {Khaw, Khai Wah and Alnoor, Alhamzah and Al-Abrrow, Hadi and Tiberius, Victor and Ganesan, Yuvaraj and Atshan, Nadia A.},
  title     = {Reactions towards organizational change},
  series = {Current psychology},
  journal   = {Current psychology},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1046-1310},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6},
  pages     = {1 -- 24},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Regardless of the prevalence and value of change initiatives in contemporary organizations, these often face resistance by employees. This resistance is the outcome of change recipients' cognitive and behavioral reactions towards change. To better understand the causes and effects of reactions to change, a holistic view of prior research is needed. Accordingly, we provide a systematic literature review on this topic. We categorize extant research into four major and several subcategories: micro and macro reactions. We analyze the essential characteristics of the emerging field of change reactions along research issues and challenges, benefits of (even negative) reactions, managerial implications, and propose future research opportunities.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HesselbarthAlnoorTiberius2023,
  author    = {Hesselbarth, Imke and Alnoor, Alhamzah and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {Behavioral strategy},
  series = {Management decision},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Management decision},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Emerald},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {0025-1747},
  doi       = {10.1108/MD-09-2021-1274},
  pages     = {2740 -- 2756},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose: Behavioral strategy, as a cognitive- and social-psychological view on strategic management, has gained increased attention. However, its conceptualization is still fuzzy and deserves an in-depth investigation. The authors aim to provide a holistic overview and classification of previous research and identify gaps to be addressed in future research. Design/methodology/approach: The authors conducted a systematic literature review on behavioral strategy. The final sample includes 46 articles from leading management journals, based on which the authors develop a research framework. Findings: The results reveal cognition and traits as major internal factors. Besides, organizational and environmental contingencies are major external factors of behavioral strategy. Originality/value: To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first holistic systematic literature review on behavioral strategy, which categorizes previous research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{RoeschTiberiusKraus2023,
  author    = {R{\"o}sch, Nicolas and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Design thinking for innovation},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1460-1060},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60834},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-608341},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose - Design thinking has become an omnipresent process to foster innovativeness in various fields. Due to its popularity in both practice and theory, the number of publications has been growing rapidly. The authors aim to develop a research framework that reflects the current state of research and allows for the identification of research gaps. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a systematic literature review based on 164 scholarly articles on design thinking. Findings - This study proposes a framework, which identifies individual and organizational context factors, the stages of a typical design thinking process with its underlying principles and tools, and the individual as well as organizational outcomes of a design thinking project. Originality/value - Whereas previous reviews focused on particular aspects of design thinking, such as its characteristics, the organizational culture as a context factor or its role on new product development, the authors provide a holistic overview of the current state of research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RoeschTiberiusKraus2023,
  author    = {R{\"o}sch, Nicolas and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Design thinking for innovation},
  series = {European journal of innovation management},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {European journal of innovation management},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Emerald},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1460-1060},
  doi       = {10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0164},
  pages     = {160 -- 176},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose - Design thinking has become an omnipresent process to foster innovativeness in various fields. Due to its popularity in both practice and theory, the number of publications has been growing rapidly. The authors aim to develop a research framework that reflects the current state of research and allows for the identification of research gaps. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a systematic literature review based on 164 scholarly articles on design thinking. Findings - This study proposes a framework, which identifies individual and organizational context factors, the stages of a typical design thinking process with its underlying principles and tools, and the individual as well as organizational outcomes of a design thinking project. Originality/value - Whereas previous reviews focused on particular aspects of design thinking, such as its characteristics, the organizational culture as a context factor or its role on new product development, the authors provide a holistic overview of the current state of research.},
  language  = {en}
}