@phdthesis{BernaschinaSchuermann2019,
  author    = {Bernaschina Sch{\"u}rmann, Vicente},
  title     = {{\´A}ngeles que cantan de continuo},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-459-3},
  issn      = {2629-2548},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42645},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426450},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {387},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Objeto de esta investigaci{\´o}n es el auge y ca{\´i}da de una legitimaci{\´o}n teol{\´o}gica de la poes{\´i}a que tuvo lugar en el virreinato del Per{\´u} entre fines del siglo XVI y la segunda mitad del siglo XVII. Su punto c{\´u}lmine est{\´a} marcado por el surgimiento de una "Academia Ant{\´a}rtica" en las primeras d{\´e}cadas del siglo XVII, mientras que su fin, se aprecia a fines del mismo siglo, cuando eruditos de las {\´o}rdenes religiosas, especialmente Juan de Espinosa y Medrano en sus textos en defensa de la poes{\´i}a y las ciencias, negaron a la poes{\´i}a cualquier estatuto teol{\´o}gico, sirvi{\´e}ndose sin embargo de ella para escribir sus sermones y textos. A partir del auge y ca{\´i}da de esta legitimaci{\´o}n teol{\´o}gica en el virreinato del Per{\´u}, este estudio muestra la existencia de dos movimientos que forman un quiasmo entre una teologizaci{\´o}n de la poes{\´i}a y una poetizaci{\´o}n de la teolog{\´i}a, en cuyo centro velado se encuentra en disputa el saber te{\´o}rico y pr{\´a}ctico de la poes{\´i}a. Lo que est{\´a} en disputa en este sentido no es la poes{\´i}a, entendida como una cumbre de las bellas letras, sino la posesi{\´o}n leg{\´i}tima de un modo de lectura anal{\´o}gico y tipol{\´o}gico del orden del universo, fundado en las Sagradas Escrituras y en la historia de la salvaci{\´o}n, y un modo po{\´e}tico para doctrinar a todos los miembros de la sociedad virreinal en concordancia con aquel modo de lectura.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hennemann2020,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Reporting on 'thinking' in Spanish and Portuguese and the role of the subject pronoun},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47445},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-474455},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The present paper is concerned with the phenomenon of reporting on the speakers' thinking when both the reporting and the reported clauses originate in one and the same speaker, i.e. the performative uses of the verbs sp. creer and pt. achar ('think'). The data are retrieved from the CdE-NOW and CdP-NOW. Adopting both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective, I concentrate on reporting on thinking with and without the overt expression of the subject pronouns sp. yo and pt. eu. In doing so, the constructions (yo) creo (que) and (eu) acho (que) as well as parenthetic and right-peripheral creo yo and acho eu are studied. According to the corpus data and compared to other possible constructions with creo and acho, creo que and acho que represent the most frequent constructions if searching for the 'node' creo or acho, that is, if the non-use of the subject pronoun exceeds its explicit expression.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hennemann2020,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {Tal vez es x vs. Tal ves sea X. Construcciones de probabilidad y el uso de los modos},
  series = {Romanica Olomucensia},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Romanica Olomucensia},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Univerzita Palack{\´e}ho v Olomouci},
  address   = {Olomouc},
  issn      = {1803-4136},
  doi       = {10.5507/ro.2020.003},
  pages     = {51 -- 71},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper is concerned with constructions that express probability and their interaction with the indicative and subjunctive mood, as well as with other contextual elements. In detail, the paper deals with the constructions [sin duda + indicative/subjunctive], [tal vez + indicative/subjunctive], [probablemente + indicative/subjunctive] and [posiblemente + indicative/subjunctive]. In their interaction with mood, the constructions are understood as different microconstructions. For example, [sin duda + indicative] and [sin duda + subjunctive] are seen as different microconstructions of the superordinate mesoconstruction [modal construction (of probability) + verb]. In a qualitative analysis examples from the CREA, CORPES XXI, and CdE corpora are examined regarding the interaction of [expression of probability] + [mood]. Following the Principle of No Synonymy of Grammatical Forms, the analysis confirms that the use of mood additionally influences the expressed degree of probability of the constructions. For instance, while probablemente generally expresses a slightly higher probability than posiblemente, a fine-tuned analysis shows that the expressed degrees of probability of [probablemente + subjunctive] and [posiblemente + indicative] are highly similar. This is also often confirmed by further contextual information. In summary, the paper shows that Cognitive Construction Grammar is a very suitable background against which to investigate modal phenomena, as cognitive approaches generally deal with the ways in which language users conceptualize the world from their own point of view, and as expressions of modality, more precisely, probability, are also closely related to speakers' attitudes or perspectives.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hennemann2016,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {A cognitive-constructionist approach to Spanish creo empty set and creo},
  series = {Folia linguistica},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Folia linguistica},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0165-4004},
  doi       = {10.1515/flin-2016-0017},
  pages     = {449 -- 474},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hennemann2016,
  author    = {Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {A cognitive-constructionist approach to Spanish creo {\O} and creo yo '[I] think'},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {121},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-397485},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The present study approaches the Spanish postposed constructions creo {\O} and creo yo '[p], [I] think' from a cognitive-constructionist perspective. It is argued that both constructions are to be distinguished from one another because creo {\O} has a subjective function, while in creo yo, it is the intersubjective dimension that is particularly prominent. The present investigation takes both a qualitative and a quantitative perspective. With regard to the latter, the problem of quantitative representativity is addressed. The discussion posed the question of how empirical research can feed back into theory, more precisely, into the framework of Cognitive Construction Grammar. The data to be analyzed here are retrieved from the corpora Corpus de Referencia del Espa{\~n}ol Actual and Corpus del Espa{\~n}ol.},
  language  = {en}
}