@phdthesis{Thonicke2019, author = {Thonicke, Kirsten}, title = {The influence of disturbance, climate extremes and land-use change on vegetation dynamics}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @article{RadchukDeLaenderCabraletal.2019, author = {Radchuk, Viktoriia and De Laender, Frederik and Cabral, Juliano Sarmento and Boulangeat, Isabelle and Crawford, Michael Scott and Bohn, Friedrich and De Raedt, Jonathan and Scherer, Cedric and Svenning, Jens-Christian and Thonicke, Kirsten and Schurr, Frank M. and Grimm, Volker and Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie}, title = {The dimensionality of stability depends on disturbance type}, series = {Ecology letters}, volume = {22}, journal = {Ecology letters}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1461-023X}, doi = {10.1111/ele.13226}, pages = {674 -- 684}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Ecosystems respond in various ways to disturbances. Quantifying ecological stability therefore requires inspecting multiple stability properties, such as resistance, recovery, persistence and invariability. Correlations among these properties can reduce the dimensionality of stability, simplifying the study of environmental effects on ecosystems. A key question is how the kind of disturbance affects these correlations. We here investigated the effect of three disturbance types (random, species-specific, local) applied at four intensity levels, on the dimensionality of stability at the population and community level. We used previously parameterized models that represent five natural communities, varying in species richness and the number of trophic levels. We found that disturbance type but not intensity affected the dimensionality of stability and only at the population level. The dimensionality of stability also varied greatly among species and communities. Therefore, studying stability cannot be simplified to using a single metric and multi-dimensional assessments are still to be recommended.}, language = {en} } @article{CanoCrespoTraxlThonicke2021, author = {Cano Crespo, Ana and Traxl, Dominik and Thonicke, Kirsten}, title = {Spatio-temporal patterns of extreme fires in Amazonian forests}, series = {European physical journal special topics}, volume = {230}, journal = {European physical journal special topics}, number = {14-15}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin ; Heidelberg}, issn = {1951-6355}, doi = {10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00164-3}, pages = {3033 -- 3044}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Fires are a fundamental part of the Earth System. In the last decades, they have been altering ecosystem structure, biogeochemical cycles and atmospheric composition with unprecedented rapidity. In this study, we implement a complex networks-based methodology to track individual fires over space and time. We focus on extreme fires-the 5\% most intense fires-in the tropical forests of the Brazilian Legal Amazon over the period 2002-2019. We analyse the interannual variability in the number and spatial patterns of extreme forest fires in years with diverse climatic conditions and anthropogenic pressure to examine potential synergies between climate and anthropogenic drivers. We observe that major droughts, that increase forest flammability, co-occur with high extreme fire years but also that it is fundamental to consider anthropogenic activities to understand the distribution of extreme fires. Deforestation fires, fires escaping from managed lands, and other types of forest degradation and fragmentation provide the ignition sources for fires to ignite in the forests. We find that all extreme forest fires identified are located within a 0.5-km distance from forest edges, and up to 56\% of them are within a 1-km distance from roads (which increases to 73\% within 5 km), showing a strong correlation that defines spatial patterns of extreme fires.}, language = {en} } @article{SakschewskivonBlohBoitetal.2016, author = {Sakschewski, Boris and von Bloh, Werner and Boit, Alice and Poorter, Lourens and Pe~na-Claros, Marielos and Heinke, Jens and Joshi, Jasmin Radha and Thonicke, Kirsten}, title = {Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity}, series = {Nature climate change}, volume = {6}, journal = {Nature climate change}, publisher = {Nature Publ. Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1758-678X}, doi = {10.1038/NCLIMATE3109}, pages = {1032 -- +}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{KarpTallisSachseetal.2015, author = {Karp, Daniel S. and Tallis, Heather and Sachse, Rene and Halpern, Ben and Thonicke, Kirsten and Cramer, Wolfgang and Mooney, Harold and Polasky, Stephen and Tietjen, Britta and Waha, Katharina and Walt, Ariane and Wolny, Stacie}, title = {National indicators for observing ecosystem service change}, series = {Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions}, volume = {35}, journal = {Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0959-3780}, doi = {10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.014}, pages = {12 -- 21}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Earth's life-support systems are in rapid decline, yet we have few metrics or indicators with which to track these changes. The world's governments are calling for biodiversity and ecosystem-service monitoring to guide and evaluate international conservation policy as well as to incorporate natural capital into their national accounts. The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) has been tasked with setting up this monitoring system. Here we explore the immediate feasibility of creating a global ecosystem-service monitoring platform under the GEO BON framework through combining data from national statistics, global vegetation models, and production function models. We found that nine ecosystem services could be annually reported at a national scale in the short term: carbon sequestration, water supply for hydropower, and non-fisheries marine products, crop, livestock, game meat, fisheries, mariculture, and timber production. Reported changes in service delivery over time reflected ecological shocks (e.g., droughts and disease outbreaks), highlighting the immediate utility of this monitoring system. Our work also identified three opportunities for creating a more comprehensive monitoring system. First, investing in input data for ecological process models (e.g., global land-use maps) would allow many more regulating services to be monitored. Currently, only 1 of 9 services that can be reported is a regulating service. Second, household surveys and censuses could help evaluate how nature affects people and provides non-monetary benefits. Finally, to forecast the sustainability of service delivery, research efforts could focus on calculating the total remaining biophysical stocks of provisioning services. Regardless, we demonstrated that a preliminary ecosystem-service monitoring platform is immediately feasible. With sufficient international investment, the platform could evolve further into a much-needed system to track changes in our planet's life-support systems. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Thonicke2003, author = {Thonicke, Kirsten}, title = {Fire disturbance and vegetation dynamics : analysis and models}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-0000713}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2003}, abstract = {Untersuchungen zur Rolle nat{\"u}rlicher St{\"o}rungen in der Vegetation bzw. in {\"O}kosystemen zeigen, dass nat{\"u}rliche St{\"o}rungen ein essentielles und intrinsisches Element in {\"O}kosystemen darstellen, substanziell zur Vitalit{\"a}t und strukturellen Diversit{\"a}t der {\"O}kosysteme beitragen und Stoffkreisl{\"a}ufe sowohl auf dem lokalen als auch auf dem globalen Niveau beeinflussen. Feuer als Grasland-, Busch- oder Waldbrand ist ein besonderes St{\"o}rungsagens, da es sowohl durch biotische als auch abiotische Umweltfaktoren verursacht wird. Es beeinflusst biogeochemische Kreisl{\"a}ufe und spielt f{\"u}r die chemische Zusammensetzung der Atmosph{\"a}re durch Freisetzung klimarelevanter Spurengase und Aerosole aus der Verbrennung von Biomasse eine bedeutende Rolle. Dies wird auch durch die Emission von ca. 3.9 Gt Kohlenstoff pro Jahr unterstrichen, was einen großen Anteil am globalen Gesamtaufkommen ausmacht. Ein kombiniertes Modell, das die Effekte und R{\"u}ckkopplungen zwischen Feuer und Vegetation beschreibt, wurde erforderlich, als {\"A}nderungen in den Feuerregimes als Folge von {\"A}nderungen in der Landnutzung und dem Landmanagement festgestellt wurden. Diese Notwendigkeit wurde noch durch die Erkenntnis unterstrichen, daß die Menge verbrennender Biomasse als ein bedeutender Kohlenstoffluß sowohl die chemische Zusammensetzung der Atmosph{\"a}re und das Klima, aber auch die Vegetationsdynamik selbst beeinflusst. Die bereits existierenden Modellans{\"a}tze reichen hier jedoch nicht aus, um entsprechende Untersuchungen durchzuf{\"u}hren. Als eine Schlussfolgerung daraus wurde eine optimale Menge von Faktoren gefunden, die das Auftreten und die Ausbreitung des Feuers, sowie deren {\"o}kosystemare Effekte ausreichend beschreiben. Ein solches Modell sollte die Merkmale beobachteter Feuerregime simulieren k{\"o}nnen und Analysen der Interaktionen zwischen Feuer und Vegetationsdynamik unterst{\"u}tzen, um auch Ursachen f{\"u}r bestimmte {\"A}nderungen in den Feuerregimes herausfinden zu k{\"o}nnen. Insbesondere die dynamischen Verkn{\"u}pfungen zwischen Vegetation, Klima und Feuerprozessen sind von Bedeutung, um dynamische R{\"u}ckkopplungen und Effekte einzelner, ver{\"a}nderter Umweltfaktoren zu analysieren. Dadurch ergab sich die Notwendigkeit, neue Feuermodelle zu entwickeln, die die genannten Untersuchungen erlauben und das Verst{\"a}ndnis der Rolle des Feuer in der globalen {\"O}kologie verbessern. Als Schlussfolgerung der Dissertation wird festgestellt, dass Feuchtebedingungen, ihre Andauer {\"u}ber die Zeit (L{\"a}nge der Feuersaison) und die Streumenge die wichtigsten Komponenten darstellen, die die Verteilung der Feuerregime global beschreiben. Werden Zeitreihen einzelner Regionen simuliert, sollten besondere Entz{\"u}ndungsquellen, brandkritische Klimabedingungen und die Bestandesstruktur als zus{\"a}tzliche Determinanten ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Die Bestandesstruktur ver{\"a}ndert das Niveau des Auftretens und der Ausbreitung von Feuer, beeinflusst jedoch weniger dessen interannuelle Variabilit{\"a}t. Das es wichtig ist, die vollst{\"a}ndige Wirkungskette wichtiger Feuerprozesse und deren Verkn{\"u}pfungen mit der Vegetationsdynamik zu ber{\"u}cksichtigen, wird besonders unter Klima{\"a}nderungsbedingungen deutlich. Eine l{\"a}nger werdende, vom Klima abh{\"a}ngige Feuersaison bedeutet nicht automatisch eine im gleichen Maße anwachsende Menge verbrannter Biomasse. Sie kann durch {\"A}nderungen in der Produktivit{\"a}t der Vegetation gepuffert oder beschleunigt werden. Sowohl durch {\"A}nderungen der Bestandesstruktur als auch durch eine erh{\"o}hte Produktivit{\"a}t der Vegetation k{\"o}nnen {\"A}nderungen der Feuereigenschaften noch weiter intensiviert werden und zu noch h{\"o}heren, feuerbezogenen Emissionen f{\"u}hren.}, language = {en} } @misc{FrankReichsteinBahnetal.2015, author = {Frank, Dorothe A. and Reichstein, Markus and Bahn, Michael and Thonicke, Kirsten and Frank, David and Mahecha, Miguel D. and Smith, Pete and Van der Velde, Marijn and Vicca, Sara and Babst, Flurin and Beer, Christian and Buchmann, Nina and Canadell, Josep G. and Ciais, Philippe and Cramer, Wolfgang and Ibrom, Andreas and Miglietta, Franco and Poulter, Ben and Rammig, Anja and Seneviratne, Sonia I. and Walz, Ariane and Wattenbach, Martin and Zavala, Miguel A. and Zscheischler, Jakob}, title = {Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts}, series = {Global change biology}, volume = {21}, journal = {Global change biology}, number = {8}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1354-1013}, doi = {10.1111/gcb.12916}, pages = {2861 -- 2880}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Extreme droughts, heat waves, frosts, precipitation, wind storms and other climate extremes may impact the structure, composition and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, and thus carbon cycling and its feedbacks to the climate system. Yet, the interconnected avenues through which climate extremes drive ecological and physiological processes and alter the carbon balance are poorly understood. Here, we review the literature on carbon cycle relevant responses of ecosystems to extreme climatic events. Given that impacts of climate extremes are considered disturbances, we assume the respective general disturbance-induced mechanisms and processes to also operate in an extreme context. The paucity of well-defined studies currently renders a quantitative meta-analysis impossible, but permits us to develop a deductive framework for identifying the main mechanisms (and coupling thereof) through which climate extremes may act on the carbon cycle. We find that ecosystem responses can exceed the duration of the climate impacts via lagged effects on the carbon cycle. The expected regional impacts of future climate extremes will depend on changes in the probability and severity of their occurrence, on the compound effects and timing of different climate extremes, and on the vulnerability of each land-cover type modulated by management. Although processes and sensitivities differ among biomes, based on expert opinion, we expect forests to exhibit the largest net effect of extremes due to their large carbon pools and fluxes, potentially large indirect and lagged impacts, and long recovery time to regain previous stocks. At the global scale, we presume that droughts have the strongest and most widespread effects on terrestrial carbon cycling. Comparing impacts of climate extremes identified via remote sensing vs. ground-based observational case studies reveals that many regions in the (sub-)tropics are understudied. Hence, regional investigations are needed to allow a global upscaling of the impacts of climate extremes on global carbon-climate feedbacks.}, language = {en} } @misc{LangerwischWalzRammigetal.2016, author = {Langerwisch, Fanny and Walz, Ariane and Rammig, Anja and Tietjen, Britta and Thonicke, Kirsten and Cramer, Wolfgang}, title = {Deforestation in Amazonia impacts riverine carbon dynamics}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {535}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-41022}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-410225}, pages = {16}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Fluxes of organic and inorganic carbon within the Amazon basin are considerably controlled by annual flooding, which triggers the export of terrigenous organic material to the river and ultimately to the Atlantic Ocean. The amount of carbon imported to the river and the further conversion, transport and export of it depend on temperature, atmospheric CO2, terrestrial productivity and carbon storage, as well as discharge. Both terrestrial productivity and discharge are influenced by climate and land use change. The coupled LPJmL and RivCM model system (Langerwisch et al., 2016) has been applied to assess the combined impacts of climate and land use change on the Amazon riverine carbon dynamics. Vegetation dynamics (in LPJmL) as well as export and conversion of terrigenous carbon to and within the river (RivCM) are included. The model system has been applied for the years 1901 to 2099 under two deforestation scenarios and with climate forcing of three SRES emission scenarios, each for five climate models. We find that high deforestation (business-as-usual scenario) will strongly decrease (locally by up to 90 \%) riverine particulate and dissolved organic carbon amount until the end of the current century. At the same time, increase in discharge leaves net carbon transport during the first decades of the century roughly unchanged only if a sufficient area is still forested. After 2050 the amount of transported carbon will decrease drastically. In contrast to that, increased temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration determine the amount of riverine inorganic carbon stored in the Amazon basin. Higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations increase riverine inorganic carbon amount by up to 20\% (SRES A2). The changes in riverine carbon fluxes have direct effects on carbon export, either to the atmosphere via outgassing or to the Atlantic Ocean via discharge. The outgassed carbon will increase slightly in the Amazon basin, but can be regionally reduced by up to 60\% due to deforestation. The discharge of organic carbon to the ocean will be reduced by about 40\% under the most severe deforestation and climate change scenario. These changes would have local and regional consequences on the carbon balance and habitat characteristics in the Amazon basin itself as well as in the adjacent Atlantic Ocean.}, language = {en} } @article{LangerwischWalzRammigetal.2016, author = {Langerwisch, Fanny and Walz, Ariane and Rammig, Anja and Tietjen, Britta and Thonicke, Kirsten and Cramer, Wolfgang}, title = {Deforestation in Amazonia impacts riverine carbon dynamics}, series = {Earth system dynamics}, volume = {7}, journal = {Earth system dynamics}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2190-4979}, doi = {10.5194/esd-7-953-2016}, pages = {953 -- 968}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Fluxes of organic and inorganic carbon within the Amazon basin are considerably controlled by annual flooding, which triggers the export of terrigenous organic material to the river and ultimately to the Atlantic Ocean. The amount of carbon imported to the river and the further conversion, transport and export of it depend on temperature, atmospheric CO2, terrestrial productivity and carbon storage, as well as discharge. Both terrestrial productivity and discharge are influenced by climate and land use change. The coupled LPJmL and RivCM model system (Langerwisch et al., 2016) has been applied to assess the combined impacts of climate and land use change on the Amazon riverine carbon dynamics. Vegetation dynamics (in LPJmL) as well as export and conversion of terrigenous carbon to and within the river (RivCM) are included. The model system has been applied for the years 1901 to 2099 under two deforestation scenarios and with climate forcing of three SRES emission scenarios, each for five climate models. We find that high deforestation (business-as-usual scenario) will strongly decrease (locally by up to 90 \%) riverine particulate and dissolved organic carbon amount until the end of the current century. At the same time, increase in discharge leaves net carbon transport during the first decades of the century roughly unchanged only if a sufficient area is still forested. After 2050 the amount of transported carbon will decrease drastically. In contrast to that, increased temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration determine the amount of riverine inorganic carbon stored in the Amazon basin. Higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations increase riverine inorganic carbon amount by up to 20\% (SRES A2). The changes in riverine carbon fluxes have direct effects on carbon export, either to the atmosphere via outgassing or to the Atlantic Ocean via discharge. The outgassed carbon will increase slightly in the Amazon basin, but can be regionally reduced by up to 60\% due to deforestation. The discharge of organic carbon to the ocean will be reduced by about 40\% under the most severe deforestation and climate change scenario. These changes would have local and regional consequences on the carbon balance and habitat characteristics in the Amazon basin itself as well as in the adjacent Atlantic Ocean.}, language = {en} } @article{ReichsteinBahnCiaisetal.2013, author = {Reichstein, Markus and Bahn, Michael and Ciais, Philippe and Frank, Dorothea and Mahecha, Miguel D. and Seneviratne, Sonia I. and Zscheischler, Jakob and Beer, Christian and Buchmann, Nina and Frank, David C. and Papale, Dario and Rammig, Anja and Smith, Pete and Thonicke, Kirsten and van der Velde, Marijn and Vicca, Sara and Walz, Ariane and Wattenbach, Martin}, title = {Climate extremes and the carbon cycle}, series = {Nature : the international weekly journal of science}, volume = {500}, journal = {Nature : the international weekly journal of science}, number = {7462}, publisher = {Nature Publ. Group}, address = {London}, issn = {0028-0836}, doi = {10.1038/nature12350}, pages = {287 -- 295}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The terrestrial biosphere is a key component of the global carbon cycle and its carbon balance is strongly influenced by climate. Continuing environmental changes are thought to increase global terrestrial carbon uptake. But evidence is mounting that climate extremes such as droughts or storms can lead to a decrease in regional ecosystem carbon stocks and therefore have the potential to negate an expected increase in terrestrial carbon uptake. Here we explore the mechanisms and impacts of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle, and propose a pathway to improve our understanding of present and future impacts of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon budget.}, language = {en} }