@article{HeisswolfReichmannPoethkeetal.2009,
  author    = {Heisswolf, Annette and Reichmann, Stefanie and Poethke, Hans Joachim and Schroeder, Boris and Obermaier, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Habitat quality matters for the distribution of an endangered leaf beetle and its egg parasitoid in a fragmented landscape},
  issn      = {1366-638X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10841-008-9139-4},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Fragmentation, deterioration, and loss of habitat patches threaten the survival of many insect species. Depending on their trophic level, species may be differently affected by these factors. However, studies investigating more than one trophic level on a landscape scale are still rare. In the present study we analyzed the effects of habitat size, isolation, and quality for the occurrence and population density of the endangered leaf beetle Cassida canaliculata Laich. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its egg parasitoid, the hymenopteran wasp Foersterella reptans Nees (Hymenoptera: Tetracampidae). C. canaliculata is strictly monophagous on meadow sage (Salvia pratensis), while F. reptans can also parasitize other hosts. Both size and isolation of habitat patches strongly determined the occurrence of the beetle. However, population density increased to a much greater extent with increasing host plant density ( = habitat quality) than with habitat size. The occurrence probability of the egg parasitoid increased with increasing population density of C. canaliculata. In conclusion, although maintaining large, well-connected patches with high host plant density is surely the major conservation goal for the specialized herbivore C. canaliculata, also small patches with high host plant densities can support viable populations and should thus be conserved. The less specialized parasitoid F. reptans is more likely to be found on patches with high beetle density, while patch size and isolation seem to be less important.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GraeffZeheReusseretal.2009,
  author    = {Gr{\"a}ff, Thomas and Zehe, Erwin and Reusser, Dominik and Lueck, Erika and Schroeder, Boris and Wenk, Gerald and John, Hermann and Bronstert, Axel},
  title     = {Process identification through rejection of model structures in a mid-mountainous rural catchment : observations of rainfall-runoff response, geophysical conditions and model inter-comparison},
  issn      = {0885-6087},
  doi       = {10.1002/Hyp.7171},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {The intention of the presented study is to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms that caused the bimodal rainfall-runoff responses which occurred up to the mid-1970s regularly in the Schafertal catchment and vanished after the onset of mining activities. Understanding, this process is a first step to understanding the ongoing hydrological change in this area. It is hypothesized that either subsurface stormflow, or fast displacement of groundwater, could cause the second delayed peak. A top-down analysis of rainfall-runoff data, field observations as well as process modelling are combined within a rejectionistic framework. A statistical analysis is used to test whether different predictors. which characterize the forcing. near surface water content and deeper subsurface store, allow the prediction of the type of rainfall-runoff response. Regression analysis is used with generalized linear models Lis they can deal with non-Gaussian error distributions Lis well its a non-stationary variance. The analysis reveals that the dominant predictors are the pre-event discharge (proxy of state of the groundwater store) and the precipitation amount, In the field campaign, the subsurface at a representative hillslope was investigated by means of electrical resistivity tomography in order to identify possible strata as flow paths for subsurface stormflow. A low resistivity in approximately 4 in depth-either due to a less permeable layer or the groundwater surface-was detected. The former Could serve as a flow path for subsurface stormflow. Finally, the physical-based hydrological model CATFLOW and the groundwater model FEFLOW are compared with respect to their ability to reproduce the bimodal runoff responses. The groundwater model is able to reproduce the observations, although it uses only an abstract representation of the hillslopes. Process model analysis as well Lis statistical analysis strongly suggest that fast displacement of groundwater is the dominant process underlying the bimodal runoff reactions.},
  language  = {en}
}