@article{RamosSanchezTriozziAliqueetal.2019,
  author    = {Ramos-Sanchez, Jose M. and Triozzi, Paolo M. and Alique, Daniel and Geng, Feng and Gao, Mingjun and Jaeger, Katja E. and Wigge, Philip Anthony and Allona, Isabel and Perales, Mariano},
  title     = {LHY2 Integrates Night-Length Information to Determine Timing of Poplar Photoperiodic Growth},
  series = {Current biology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Current biology},
  number    = {14},
  publisher = {Cell Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0960-9822},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.003},
  pages     = {2402 -- 2406},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Day length is a key indicator of seasonal information that determines major patterns of behavior in plants and animals. Photoperiodism has been described in plants for about 100 years, but the underlying molecular mechanisms of day length perception and signal transduction in many systems are not well understood. In trees, photoperiod perception plays a major role in growth cessation during the autumn as well as activating the resumption of shoot growth in the spring, both processes controlled by FLOWERING LOCUS T2 (FT2) expression levels and critical for the survival of perennial plants over winter [1-4]. It has been shown that the conserved role of poplar orthologs to Arabidopsis CONSTANS (CO) directly activates FT2 expression [1, 5]. Overexpression of poplar CO is, however, not sufficient to sustain FT2 expression under short days [5] , pointing to the presence of an additional short-day-dependent FT2 repression pathway in poplar. We find that night length information is transmitted via the expression level of a poplar clock gene, LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 2 (LHY2), which controls FT2 expression. Repression of FT2 is a function of the night extension and LHY2 expression level. We show that LHY2 is necessary and sufficient to activate night length repressive signaling. We propose that the photoperiodic control of shoot growth in poplar involves a balance between FT2 activating and repressing pathways. Our results show that poplar relies on night length measurement to determine photoperiodism through interaction between light signaling pathways and the circadian clock.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AndradeLuCordeiroetal.2022,
  author    = {Andrade, Luis and Lu, Yunlong and Cordeiro, Andre and Costa, Jo{\~a}o M. F. and Wigge, Philip Anthony and Saibo, Nelson J. M. and Jaeger, Katja E.},
  title     = {The evening complex integrates photoperiod signals to control flowering in rice},
  series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America : PNAS},
  volume    = {119},
  journal   = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America : PNAS},
  number    = {26},
  publisher = {National Acad. of Sciences},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0027-8424},
  doi       = {10.1073/pnas.2122582119},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Plants use photoperiodism to activate flowering in response to a particular daylength. In rice, flowering is accelerated in short-day conditions, and even a brief exposure to light during the dark period (night-break) is sufficient to delay flowering. Although many of the genes involved in controlling flowering in rice have been uncovered, how the long- and short-day flowering pathways are integrated, and the mechanism of photoperiod perception is not understood. While many of the signaling components controlling photoperiod-activated flowering are conserved between Arabidopsis and rice, flowering in these two systems is activated by opposite photoperiods. Here we establish that photoperiodism in rice is controlled by the evening complex (EC). We show that mutants in the EC genes LUX ARRYTHMO (LUX) and EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3) paralogs abolish rice flowering. We also show that the EC directly binds and suppresses the expression of flowering repressors, including PRR37 and Ghd7. We further demonstrate that light acts via phyB to cause a rapid and sustained posttranslational modification of ELF3-1. Our results suggest a mechanism by which the EC is able to control both long- and short-day flowering pathways.},
  language  = {en}
}