@article{KerrLorenzSchoenetal.2021,
  author    = {Kerr, John and Lorenz, Anja and Sch{\"o}n, Sandra and Ebner, Martin and Wittke, Andreas},
  title     = {Open Tools and Methods to Support the Development of MOOCs},
  series = {EMOOCs 2021},
  volume    = {2021},
  journal   = {EMOOCs 2021},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-512-5},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51721},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-517219},
  pages     = {187 -- 200},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {There are a plethora of ways to guide and support people to learn about MOOC (massive open online course) development, from their first interest, sourcing supportive resources, methods and tools to better aid their understanding of the concepts and pedagogical approaches of MOOC design, to becoming a MOOC developer. This contribution highlights tools and methods that are openly available and re-usable under Creative Commons licenses. Our collection builds upon the experiences from three MOOC development and hosting teams with joint experiences of several hundred MOOCs (University of Applied Sciences in L{\"u}beck, Graz University of Technology, University of Glasgow) in three European countries, which are Germany, Austria and the UK. The contribution recommends and shares experiences with short articles and poster for first information sharing a Monster MOOC assignment for beginners, a MOOC canvas for first sketches, the MOOC design kit for details of instructional design and a MOOC for MOOC makers and a MOOC map as introduction into a certain MOOC platform.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LorenzBockSchulteOstermann2023,
  author    = {Lorenz, Anja and Bock, Stefanie and Schulte-Ostermann, Juleka},
  title     = {Challenges and proposals for introducing digital certificates in higher education infrastructures},
  series = {EMOOCs 2023 : Post-Covid Prospects for Massive Open Online Courses - Boost or Backlash?},
  journal   = {EMOOCs 2023 : Post-Covid Prospects for Massive Open Online Courses - Boost or Backlash?},
  editor    = {Meinel, Christoph and Schweiger, Stefanie and Staubitz, Thomas and Conrad, Robert and Alario Hoyos, Carlos and Ebner, Martin and Sancassani, Susanna and Żur, Agnieszka and Friedl, Christian and Halawa, Sherif and Gamage, Dilrukshi and Scott, Jeffrey and Kristine Jonson Carlon, May and Deville, Yves and Gaebel, Michael and Delgado Kloos, Carlos and von Schmieden, Karen},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-62470},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-624701},
  pages     = {263 -- 270},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Questions about the recognition of MOOCs within and outside higher education were already being raised in the early 2010s. Today, recognition decisions are still made more or less on a case-by-case basis. However, digital certification approaches are now emerging that could automate recognition processes. The technical development of the required machinereadable documents and infrastructures is already well advanced in some cases. The DigiCerts consortium has developed a solution based on a collective blockchain. There are ongoing and open discussions regarding the particular technology, but the institutional implementation of digital certificates raises further questions. A number of workshops have been held at the Institute for Interactive Systems at Technische Hochschule L{\"u}beck, which have identified the need for new responsibilities for issuing certificates. It has also become clear that all members of higher education institutions need to develop skills in the use of digital certificates.},
  language  = {en}
}