@misc{Rauh2006,
  author    = {Rauh, Hellgard},
  title     = {Wyss-Wanner, M., Ein Leben f{\"u}r Kinder: Leben und Werk von Marie Meierhofer, 1909-1998; Dietikon, Juris-Dr. u. Verl., 2000},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{OberauerWeidenfeldHoernig2006,
  author    = {Oberauer, Klaus and Weidenfeld, Andrea and H{\"o}rnig, Robin},
  title     = {Working memory capacity and the construction of spatial mental models in comprehension and deductive reasoning},
  doi       = {10.1080/17470210500151717},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {We asked 149 high-school students who were pretested for their working memory capacity (WMC) to read spatial descriptions relating to five objects and to evaluate conclusions asserting an unmentioned relationship between two of the objects. Unambiguous descriptions were compatible with a single spatial arrangement, whereas ambiguous descriptions permitted two arrangements; a subset of the ambiguous descriptions still determined the relation asserted in the conclusion, whereas another subset did not. Two groups of participants received different instructions: The deduction group should accept conclusions only if they followed with logical necessity from the description, whereas the comprehension group should accept a conclusion if it agreed with their representation of the arrangement. Self-paced reading times increased on sentences that introduced an ambiguity, replicating previous findings in deductive reasoning experiments. This effect was also found in the comprehension group, casting doubt on the interpretation that people consider multiple possible arrangements online. Responses to conclusions could be modelled by a multinomial processing model with four parameters: the probability of constructing a correct mental model, the probability of detecting an ambiguity, and two guessing parameters. Participants with high and with low WMC differed mainly in the probability of successfully constructing a mental model},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoernigWeskottKliegletal.2006,
  author    = {H{\"o}rnig, Robin and Weskott, Thomas and Kliegl, Reinhold and Fanselow, Gisbert},
  title     = {Word order variation in spatial descriptions with adverbs},
  issn      = {0090-502X},
  doi       = {10.3758/BF03193264},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Previous research has shown that in a three-term spatial reasoning task, the second premise of a German premise pair is especially easy to comprehend if (1) the prepositional object rather than the grammatical subject denotes the given entity, and if (2) the term denoting the given entity precedes the term denoting the new entity. Accordingly, the second premise is easiest to comprehend with noncanonical word order-that is, with the prepositional object in preverbal position denoting the given entity (e.g., To the right of the given object is the new subject). This finding is explained in terms of contextual licensing of noncanonical word order. Here, we discuss and tested two alternative accounts of contextual licensing, given-new and partially ordered set relations (Poset). The given-new account claims that noncanonical word order is licensed by the term denoting the given entity preceding the term denoting the new entity. On the Poset account, noncanonical word order is licensed if the preverbal constituent introduces a new entity that stands in a transitive, irreflexive, and asymmetric relation to a given entity. Comprehension times for second premises with spatial adverbs in four different word orders support both accounts of contextual licensing; Poset licensing was stronger than given-new licensing.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WilhelmOberauer2006,
  author    = {Wilhelm, Oliver and Oberauer, Klaus},
  title     = {Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus- response compatibility in choice reaction time tasks},
  doi       = {10.1080/09541440500215921},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {A study with 114 young adults investigated the correlations of intelligence factors and working-memory capacity with reaction time (RT) tasks. Within two sets of four-choice RT tasks, stimulus-response compatibility was varied over three levels: compatible, incompatible, and arbitrary mappings. Two satisfactory measurement models for the RTs could be established: A general factor model without constraints on the loadings and a nested model with two correlated factors, distinguishing compatible from arbitrary mappings, with constraints on the loadings. Structural models additionally including factors for working memory and intelligence showed that the nested model with correlated factors is superior in fit. Working-memory capacity and fluid intelligence were correlated strongly with the nested factor for the RT tasks with arbitrary mappings, and less with the general RT factor. The results support the hypothesis that working memory is needed to maintain arbitrary bindings between stimulus representations and response representations, and this could explain the correlation of working-memory capacity with speed in choice RT tasks},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EsserBallaschk2006,
  author    = {Esser, G{\"u}nter and Ballaschk, Katja},
  title     = {Verhaltenstherapie und Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie},
  isbn      = {978- 3-406-54106-3},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EsserLange2006,
  author    = {Esser, G{\"u}nter and Lange, Sabine},
  title     = {Verhaltensdiagnostik in der Verhaltenstherapie},
  isbn      = {978-3-932096-43-3},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Rheinberg2006,
  author    = {Rheinberg, Falko},
  title     = {Valutare la motivazione : strumenti perl'analisi dei processi motivazionali},
  publisher = {il Mulino},
  address   = {Bologna},
  isbn      = {978-88-15-11541-6},
  pages     = {198 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {it}
}
@article{EsserLange2006,
  author    = {Esser, G{\"u}nter and Lange, Sabine},
  title     = {Unbeschriebene Entwicklungsst{\"o}rung des Lesens und Rechtschreibens},
  isbn      = {978- 3-406-54106-3},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ThielRomanoKurthsetal.2006,
  author    = {Thiel, Marco and Romano, Maria Carmen and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen and Rolfs, Martin and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Twin surrogates to test for complex synchronisation},
  doi       = {10.1209/epl/i2006-10147-0},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {We present an approach to generate (multivariate) twin surrogates (TS) based on recurrence properties. This technique generates surrogates which correspond to an independent copy of the underlying system, i.e. they induce a trajectory of the underlying system starting at different initial conditions. We show that these surrogates are well suited to test for complex synchronisation and exemplify this for the paradigmatic system of Rossler oscillators. The proposed test enables to assess the statistical relevance of a synchronisation analysis from passive experiments which are typical in natural systems},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LotzKinder2006,
  author    = {Lotz, Anja and Kinder, Annette},
  title     = {Transfer in artificial grammar learning : the role of repetition information},
  issn      = {0278-7393},
  doi       = {10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.707},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {In this article, the authors report 2 experiments that investigated the sources of information used in transfer and nontransfer tasks in artificial grammar learning. Multiple regression analyses indicated that 2 types of information about repeating elements were crucial for performance in both tasks: information about the repetition of adjacent elements and information about repetition of elements in the whole item. Similarity of test items to specific training items and chunk information influenced participants' judgments only in nontransfer tasks},
  language  = {en}
}