@article{WendlandRotherTosch2023, author = {Wendland, Mirko and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank}, title = {Zum Kompetenzerleben der Studierenden im Schulpraktikum (Praxissemester) - Entwicklung und Einflussfaktoren}, series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, journal = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-568-2}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-61631}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-616314}, pages = {83 -- 102}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Studien zu langen Praxisphasen konnten aufzeigen, dass das Kompetenzerleben der Studierenden von Beginn bis zum Ende der Praxisphase zunahm. Auf Basis einer langfristig angelegten Evaluationsstudie zu allen bildungswissenschaftlichen und fachdidaktischen Praktika im Verlauf des Ba-/Ma-Lehramtsstudiums wurde auch das selbst eingesch{\"a}tzte Kompetenzerleben Studierender im Schulpraktikum (Praxissemester) analysiert. Die empirische Befundlage deutet darauf hin, dass die Auspr{\"a}gung des Kompetenzerlebens hinsichtlich SuSorientiertem Handeln, Unterrichtlichem Handeln und Wertvermittelndem Handeln {\"u}ber den Praktikumszeitraum zunimmt. Innovierend-kooperatives Handeln zeigt keine signifikante Entwicklung. Spezielle Einfl{\"u}sse konnten vor allem durch das wahrgenommene Kompetenzerleben zu Beginn des Schulpraktikums, aber auch durch die jeweilige Nachbereitung der Fachdidaktik und der Bildungswissenschaften ermittelt werden. Die Befunde werden mit Blick auf die bisherige Forschungslage und die Stichprobe der Untersuchung kritisch diskutiert.}, language = {de} } @article{KulgemeyerBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2020, author = {Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Vogelsang, Christoph}, title = {Professional knowledge affects action-related skills}, series = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching}, volume = {57}, journal = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching}, number = {10}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0022-4308}, doi = {10.1002/tea.21632}, pages = {1554 -- 1582}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Professional knowledge is an important source of science teachers' actions in the classroom (e.g., personal professional content knowledge [pedagogical content knowledge, PCK] is the source of enacted PCK in the refined consensus model [RCM] for PCK). However, the evidence for this claim is ambiguous at best. This study applied a cross-lagged panel design to examine the relationship between professional knowledge and actions in one particular instructional situation: explaining physics. Pre- and post a field experience (one semester), 47 preservice physics teachers from four different universities were tested for their content knowledge (CK), PCK, pedagogical knowledge (PK), and action-related skills in explaining physics. The study showed that joint professional knowledge (the weighted sum of CK, PCK, and PK scores) at the beginning of the field experience impacted the development of explaining skills during the field experience (beta = .38**). We interpret this as a particular relationship between professional knowledge and science teachers' action-related skills (enacted PCK): professional knowledge is necessary for the development of explaining skills. That is evidence that personal PCK affects enacted PCK. In addition, field experiences are often supposed to bridge the theory-practice gap by transforming professional knowledge into instructional practice. Our results suggest that for field experiences to be effective, preservice teachers should start with profound professional knowledge.}, language = {en} }