@article{VargasFariasCarretieretal.2011, author = {Vargas, Gabriel and Farias, Marcelo and Carretier, Sebastien and Tassara, Andres and Baize, Stephane and Melnick, Daniel}, title = {Coastal uplift and tsunami effects associated to the 2010 M(w)8.8 Maule earthquake in Central Chile}, series = {Andean geology}, volume = {38}, journal = {Andean geology}, number = {1}, publisher = {Servicio Nacional de Geolog{\`i}a y Miner{\`i}a}, address = {Santiago}, issn = {0718-7106}, doi = {10.5027/andgeoV38n1-a12}, pages = {219 -- 238}, year = {2011}, abstract = {On February 27, 2010 at 03:34:08 AM an M(w)8.8 earthquake, with epicenter located off Cobquecura (73.24 degrees W; 36.29 degrees S), severely hit Central Chile. The tsunami waves that followed this event affected the coastal regions between the cities of Valparaiso and Valdivia, with minor effects as far as Coquimbo. The earthquake occurred along the subduction of the Nazca oceanic plate beneath the South American plate. Coseismic coastal uplift was estimated through observations of bleached lithothamnioids crustose coralline algae, which were exposed after the mainshock between 34.13 degrees S and 38.34 degrees S, suggesting the latitudinal distribution of the earthquake rupture. The measured coastal uplift values varied between 240 +/- 20 cm at sites closer to the trench along the western coast of the Arauco peninsula and 15 +/- 10 cm at sites located farther east. A maximum value of 260 +/- 50 cm was observed at the western coast of Santa Maria Island, which is similar to the reported uplift associated with the 1835 earthquake at Concepcion. Land subsidence values on the order of 0.5 m to 1 m evidenced a change in polarity and position of the coseismic hinge at 110-120 km from the trench. In four sites along the coast we observed a close match between coastal uplift values deduced from bleached lithothamnioids algae and GPS measurements. According to field observations tsunami heights reached ea. 14 m in the coastal area of the Maule Region immediately north of the epicenter, and diminished progressively northwards to 4-2 m near Valparaiso. Along the coast of Cobquecura, tsunami height values were inferior to 2-4 m. More variable tsunami heights of 6-8 m were measured at Dichato-Talcahuano and Tirua-Puerto Saavedra, in the Biobio and Arauco regions, respectively, to the south of the epicenter. According to eyewitnesses, the tsunami reached the coast between 12 to 20 and 30 to 45 minutes in areas located closer and faraway from the earthquake rupture zone, respectively. Destructive tsunami waves arrived also between 2.5 and 4.5 hours after the mainshock, especially along the coast of the Biobio and Arauco regions. The tsunami effects were highly variable along the coast, as a result of geomorphological and bathymetric local conditions, besides potential complexities induced by the main shock.}, language = {en} } @article{MelnickMorenoCisternasetal.2012, author = {Melnick, Daniel and Moreno, Marcos and Cisternas, Marco and Tassara, Andres}, title = {Darwin seismic gap closed by the 2010 Maule earthquake}, series = {Andean geology}, volume = {39}, journal = {Andean geology}, number = {3}, publisher = {Servicio Nacional de Geolog{\`i}a y Miner{\`i}a}, address = {Santiago}, issn = {0718-7092}, doi = {10.5027/andgeoV39n3-a11}, pages = {558 -- 563}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The Maule earthquake (Mw 8.8) that affected south-central Chile on February 27, 2010 was preceded by the 1835 event documented by FitzRoy and Darwin. The relation between both events has been controversial. Fault slip in 2010 estimated by Lorito et al. (2011) is less than expected from 175 years of strain accumulation, leading them to conclude only limited overlap between the 2010 and 1835 events, and that a Mw 7.5-8 event could still strike the Concepcion region. However, Lorito et al.'s model was based on displacements obtained from only 6 GPS stations and underpredicts observations from recent studies. Here we show that an alternative model based on 169 GPS displacements reproduces the data better, suggesting Lorito et al.'s main conclusion is not correct. Based on a slip deficit map, we suggest the seismic gap opened in 1835 was most likely closed in 2010.}, language = {en} } @article{MorenoMelnickRosenauetal.2012, author = {Moreno, Marcelo Spegiorin and Melnick, Daniel and Rosenau, M. and B{\´a}ez, Juan Carlos and Klotz, Jan and Oncken, Onno and Tassara, Andres and Chen, J. and Bataille, Klaus and Bevis, M. and Socquet, Anne and Bolte, John and Vigny, C. and Brooks, B. and Ryder, I. and Grund, Volker and Smalley, B. and Carrizo, Daniel and Bartsch, M. and Hase, H.}, title = {Toward understanding tectonic control on the M-w 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake}, series = {Earth \& planetary science letters}, volume = {321}, journal = {Earth \& planetary science letters}, number = {3}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0012-821X}, doi = {10.1016/j.epsl.2012.01.006}, pages = {152 -- 165}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The Maule earthquake of 27th February 2010 (M-w = 8.8) affected similar to 500 km of the Nazca-South America plate boundary in south-central Chile producing spectacular crustal deformation. Here, we present a detailed estimate of static coseismic surface offsets as measured by survey and continuous GPS, both in near- and far-field regions. Earthquake slip along the megathrust has been inferred from a Joint inversion of our new data together with published GPS, InSAR, and land-level changes data using Green's functions generated by a spherical finite-element model with realistic subduction zone geometry. The combination of the data sets provided a good resolution, indicating that most of the slip was well resolved. Coseismic slip was concentrated north of the epicenter with up to 16 m of slip, whereas to the south it reached over 10 m within two minor patches. A comparison of coseismic slip with the slip deficit accumulated since the last great earthquake in 1835 suggests that the 2010 event closed a mature seismic gap. Slip deficit distribution shows an apparent local overshoot that highlight cycle-to-cycle variability, which has to be taken into account when anticipating future events from interseismic observations. Rupture propagation was obviously not affected by bathymetric features of the incoming plate. Instead, splay faults in the upper plate seem to have limited rupture propagation in the updip and along-strike directions. Additionally, we found that along-strike gradients in slip are spatially correlated with geometrical inflections of the megathrust. Our study suggests that persistent tectonic features may control strain accumulation and release along subduction megathrusts.}, language = {en} }