@article{RuedianVladova2021, author = {R{\"u}dian, Sylvio Leo and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Kostenfreie Onlinekurse nachhaltig mit personalisiertem Marketing finanzieren}, series = {HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, volume = {58}, journal = {HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1436-3011}, doi = {10.1365/s40702-021-00720-4}, pages = {507 -- 520}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Selbstbestimmtes Lernen mit Onlinekursen findet zunehmend mehr Akzeptanz in unserer Gesellschaft. Lernende k{\"o}nnen mithilfe von Onlinekursen selbst festlegen, was sie wann lernen und Kurse k{\"o}nnen durch vielf{\"a}ltige Adaptionen an den Lernfortschritt der Nutzer angepasst und individualisiert werden. Auf der einen Seite ist eine große Zielgruppe f{\"u}r diese Lernangebote vorhanden. Auf der anderen Seite sind die Erstellung von Onlinekursen, ihre Bereitstellung, Wartung und Betreuung kostenintensiv, wodurch hochwertige Angebote h{\"a}ufig kostenpflichtig angeboten werden m{\"u}ssen, um als Anbieter zumindest kostenneutral agieren zu k{\"o}nnen. In diesem Beitrag er{\"o}rtern und diskutieren wir ein offenes, nachhaltiges datengetriebenes zweiseitiges Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell zur Verwertung gepr{\"u}fter Onlinekurse und deren kostenfreie Bereitstellung f{\"u}r jeden Lernenden. Kern des Gesch{\"a}ftsmodells ist die Nutzung der dabei entstehenden Verhaltensdaten, die daraus m{\"o}gliche Ableitung von Pers{\"o}nlichkeitsmerkmalen und Interessen und deren Nutzung im kommerziellen Kontext. Dies ist eine bei der Websuche bereits weitl{\"a}ufig akzeptierte Methode, welche nun auf den Lernkontext {\"u}bertragen wird. Welche M{\"o}glichkeiten, Herausforderungen, aber auch Barrieren {\"u}berwunden werden m{\"u}ssen, damit das Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell nachhaltig und ethisch vertretbar funktioniert, werden zwei unabh{\"a}ngige, jedoch synergetisch verbundene Gesch{\"a}ftsmodelle vorgestellt und diskutiert. Zus{\"a}tzlich wurde die Akzeptanz und Erwartung der Zielgruppe f{\"u}r das vorgestellte Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell untersucht, um notwendige Kernressourcen f{\"u}r die Praxis abzuleiten. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung zeigen, dass das Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell von den Nutzer*innen grundlegend akzeptiert wird. 10 \% der Befragten w{\"u}rden es bevorzugen, mit virtuellen Assistenten - anstelle mit Tutor*innen zu lernen. Zudem ist der Großteil der Nutzer*innen sich nicht dar{\"u}ber bewusst, dass Pers{\"o}nlichkeitsmerkmale anhand des Nutzerverhaltens abgeleitet werden k{\"o}nnen.}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaGronau2022, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {KI-basierte Assistenzsysteme in betrieblichen Lernprozessen}, series = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, volume = {38}, journal = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, number = {2}, publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag f{\"u}r Industrielle Informationstechnik und Organisation}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2364-9216}, doi = {10.30844/I40M_22-2_11-14}, pages = {11 -- 14}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Assistenzsysteme finden im Kontext der digitalen Transformation immer mehr Einsatz. Sie k{\"o}nnen Besch{\"a}ftigte in industriellen Produktionsprozessen sowohl in der Anlern- als auch in der aktiven Arbeitsphase unterst{\"u}tzen. Kompetenzen k{\"o}nnen so arbeitsplatz- und prozessnah sowie bedarfsorientiert aufgebaut werden. In diesem Beitrag wird der aktuelle Forschungsstand zu den Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten dieser Assistenzsysteme diskutiert und mit Beispielen illustriert. Es werden unter anderem auch Herausforderungen f{\"u}r den Einsatz aufgezeigt. Am Ende des Beitrags werden Potenziale f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Nutzung von AS in industriellen Lernprozessen und f{\"u}r die Forschung identifiziert.}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaUllrichSloaneetal.2023, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Sloane, Mona and Renz, Andr{\´e} and Tsui, Eric}, title = {Editorial: new teaching and learning worlds}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2023.1175498}, pages = {1 -- 3}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @article{CromwellHaaseVladova2023, author = {Cromwell, Johnathan R. and Haase, Jennifer and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {The creative thinking profile}, series = {Personality and individual differences}, volume = {208}, journal = {Personality and individual differences}, publisher = {Elsevier Science}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0191-8869}, doi = {10.1016/j.paid.2023.112205}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Intrinsic motivation is widely considered essential to creativity because it facilitates more divergent thinking during problem solving. However, we argue that intrinsic motivation has been theorized too heavily as a unitary construct, overlooking various internal factors of a task that can shape the baseline level of intrinsic motivation people have for working on the task. Drawing on theories of cognitive styles, we develop a new scale that measures individual preferences for three different creative thinking styles that we call divergent thinking, bricoleurgent thinking, and emergent thinking. Through a multi-study approach consisting of exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and convergent validity, we provide psychometric evidence showing that people can have distinct preferences for each cognitive process when generating ideas. Furthermore, when validating this scale through an experiment, we find that each style becomes more dominant in predicting overall enjoyment, engagement, and creativity based on different underlying structures of a task. Therefore, this paper makes both theoretical and empirical contributions to literature by unpacking intrinsic motivation, showing how the alignment between different creative thinking styles and task can be essential to predicting intrinsic motivation, thus reversing the direction of causality between the motivational and cognitive components of creativity typically assumed in literature.}, language = {en} } @article{WotschackVladovadePaivaLareiroetal.2022, author = {Wotschack, Philip and Vladova, Gergana and de Paiva Lareiro, Patricia and Thim, Christof}, title = {Learning via assistance systems in industrial manufacturing}, series = {Journal of workplace learning}, volume = {35}, journal = {Journal of workplace learning}, number = {9}, publisher = {Emerald}, address = {Bradford}, issn = {1366-5626}, doi = {10.1108/JWL-09-2022-0119}, pages = {235 -- 258}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how learning solely via an assistance system influences work performance compared with learning with a combination of an assistance system and additional training. While the training literature has widely emphasised the positive role of on-the-job training, particularly for groups that are often underrepresented in formalised learning situations, organisational studies have stressed the risks that emerge when holistic process knowledge is lacking and how this negatively affects work performance. This study aims at testing these negative effects within an experimental design. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a laboratory experimental design to investigate how assistance-system-guided learning influences the individuals' work performance and work satisfaction compared with assistance-system-guided learning combined with theoretical learning of holistic process knowledge. Subjects were divided into two groups and assigned to two different settings. In the first setting, the participants used the assistance systems as an orientation and support tool right at the beginning and learned the production steps exclusively in this way. In the second setting, subjects received an additional 10-min introduction (treatment) at the beginning of the experiment, including detailed information regarding the entire work process. Findings This study provides evidence that learners provided with prior process knowledge achieve a better understanding of the work process leading to higher levels of productivity, quality and work satisfaction. At the same time, the authors found evidence for differences among workers' ability to process and apply this additional information. Subjects with lower productivity levels faced more difficulties processing and applying additional process information. Research limitations/implications Methodologically, this study goes beyond existing research on assistance systems by using a laboratory experimental design. Though the external validity of this method is limited by the artificial setting, it is a solid way of studying the impact of different usages of digital assistance systems in terms of training. Further research is required, however, including laboratory experiments with larger case numbers, company-level case studies and analyses of survey data, to further confirm the external validity of the findings of this study for the workplace. Practical implications This study provides some first evidence that holistic process knowledge, even in low-skill tasks, has an added value for the production process. This study contributes to firms' training policies by exploring new, digitalised ways of guided on-the-job training and demonstrates possible training benefits for people with lower levels of (initial) abilities and motivation. Social implications This study indicates the advantage for companies and societies to invest in additional skills and training and points at the limitations of assistance systems. This paper also contributes to training policies by exploring new, digitalised ways of guided on-the-job training and demonstrates possible training benefits for people with lower levels of (initial) abilities and motivation. Originality/value This study extends existing research on digital assistance systems by investigating their role in job-related-training. This paper contributes to labour sociology and organisational research by confirming the importance of holistic process knowledge as opposed to a solely task-oriented digital introduction.}, language = {en} } @article{TeichmannVladovaGronau2023, author = {Teichmann, Malte and Vladova, Gergana and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Conception of subject-oriented learning}, series = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network}, journal = {SSRN eLibrary / Social Science Research Network}, publisher = {Social Science Electronic Publ.}, address = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]}, issn = {1556-5068}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.4457995}, pages = {6}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Competence development must change at all didactic levels to meet the new requirements triggered by digitization. Unlike classic learning theories and the resulting popular approaches (e.g., sender-receiver model), future-oriented vocational training must include new learning theory impulses in the discussion about competence acquisition. On the one hand, these impulses are often very well elaborated on the theoretical side, but the transfer into innovative learning environments - such as learning factories - is often still missing. On the other hand, actual learning factory (design) approaches often concentrate primarily on the technical side. Subject-oriented learning theory enables the design of competence development-oriented vocational training projectsin learning factories in which persons can obtain relevant competencies for digitization. At the same time, such learning theory approaches assume a potentially infinite number of learning interests and reasons. Following this, competence development is always located in an institutional or organizational context. The paper conceptionally answers how this theoryimmanent challenge is synthesizable with the reality of organizationally competence development requirements.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaWotschackLareiroetal.2020, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Wotschack, Philip and Lareiro, Patricia de Paiva and Gronau, Norbert and Thim, Christof}, title = {Lernen mit Assistenzsystemen}, series = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, volume = {36}, journal = {Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse}, number = {3}, publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2364-9208}, doi = {10.30844/I40M_20-3_S16-20}, pages = {16 -- 20}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Der Beitrag beschreibt die Konzeption und Durchf{\"u}hrung und bietet einen Einblick in die ersten Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung mit experimentellem Design in einer simulierten Prozessumgebung im Forschungs- und Anwendungszentrum Industrie 4.0 in Potsdam. Im Mittelpunkt stehen Anlernprozesse im Bereich der Einfacharbeit (Helfert{\"a}tigkeiten) und ihre Gestaltung durch den Einsatz digitaler Assistenzsysteme. In der Arbeitsforschung finden sich Hinweise darauf, dass mit dem Einsatz dieser Systeme Prozesswissen verloren geht, im Sinne einer guten Kenntnis des gesamten Arbeitsprozesses, in den die einzelnen T{\"a}tigkeiten eingebettet sind. Das kann sich als Problem erweisen, vor allem wenn unvorhersehbare Situationen oder Fehler eintreten. Um die Rolle von Prozesswissen beim Einsatz von digitalen Assistenzsystemen zu untersuchen, wird im Experiment eine echte Fabriksituation simuliert. Die Probanden werden {\"u}ber ein Assistenzsystem Schritt f{\"u}r Schritt in ihre Aufgabent{\"a}tigkeit angelernt, einem Teil der Probanden wird allerdings am Anfang zus{\"a}tzlich Prozesswissen im Rahmen einer kurzen Schulung vermittelt.}, language = {de} } @article{UllrichVladovaEigelshovenetal.2022, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Eigelshoven, Felix and Renz, Andr{\´e}}, title = {Data mining of scientific research on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions}, series = {Discover artificial intelligence}, volume = {2}, journal = {Discover artificial intelligence}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2731-0809}, doi = {10.1007/s44163-022-00031-7}, pages = {18}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Teaching and learning as well as administrative processes are still experiencing intensive changes with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and its diverse application opportunities in the context of higher education. Therewith, the scientific interest in the topic in general, but also specific focal points rose as well. However, there is no structured overview on AI in teaching and administration processes in higher education institutions that allows to identify major research topics and trends, and concretizing peculiarities and develops recommendations for further action. To overcome this gap, this study seeks to systematize the current scientific discourse on AI in teaching and administration in higher education institutions. This study identified an (1) imbalance in research on AI in educational and administrative contexts, (2) an imbalance in disciplines and lack of interdisciplinary research, (3) inequalities in cross-national research activities, as well as (4) neglected research topics and paths. In this way, a comparative analysis between AI usage in administration and teaching and learning processes, a systematization of the state of research, an identification of research gaps as well as further research path on AI in higher education institutions are contributed to research.}, language = {en} } @article{DragičevićVladovaUllrich2023, author = {Dragičević, Nikolina and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}}, title = {Design thinking capabilities in the digital world}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers}, address = {Lausanne, Schweiz}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478}, pages = {18}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Recent research suggests that design thinking practices may foster the development of needed capabilities in new digitalised landscapes. However, existing publications represent individual contributions, and we lack a holistic understanding of the value of design thinking in a digital world. No review, to date, has offered a holistic retrospection of this research. In response, in this bibliometric review, we aim to shed light on the intellectual structure of multidisciplinary design thinking literature related to capabilities relevant to the digital world in higher education and business settings, highlight current trends and suggest further studies to advance theoretical and empirical underpinnings. Our study addresses this aim using bibliometric methods—bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis as they are particularly suitable for identifying current trends and future research priorities at the forefront of the research. Overall, bibliometric analyses of the publications dealing with the related topics published in the last 10 years (extracted from the Web of Science database) expose six trends and two possible future research developments highlighting the expanding scope of the design thinking scientific field related to capabilities required for the (more sustainable and human-centric) digital world. Relatedly, design thinking becomes a relevant approach to be included in higher education curricula and human resources training to prepare students and workers for the changing work demands. This paper is well-suited for education and business practitioners seeking to embed design thinking capabilities in their curricula and for design thinking and other scholars wanting to understand the field and possible directions for future research.}, language = {en} } @article{UllrichVladovaMarquartetal.2022, author = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Marquart, Danny and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {An overwiew of benefits and risks in open innovation projects and the influence of intermediary participation, decision-making authority, experience, and position on their perception}, series = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM}, volume = {26}, journal = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM}, number = {02}, publisher = {World Scientific Publ.}, address = {Singapore}, issn = {1363-9196}, doi = {10.1142/S1363919622500128}, pages = {41}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This paper presents an exploratory study investigating the influence of the factors (1) intermediary participation, (2) decision-making authority, (3) position in the enterprise, and (4) experience in open innovation on the perception and assessment of the benefits and risks expected from participating in open innovation projects. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The result of this paper is an empirical evidence showing whether and how these factors affect the perception of potential benefits and risks expected within the context of open innovation project participation. Furthermore, the identified effects are discussed against the theory. Existing theory regarding the benefits and risks of open innovation is expanded by (1) finding that they are perceived mostly independently of the factors, (2) confirming the practical relevance of benefits and risks, and (3) enabling a finer distinction between their degrees of relevance according to respective contextual specifics.}, language = {en} }