@misc{KirschBuschingRohlfetal.2017,
  author    = {Kirsch, Fabian and Busching, Robert and Rohlf, Helena L. and Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {Using behavioral observation for the longitudinal study of anger regulation in middle childhood},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {461},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412557},
  pages     = {15},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Assessing anger regulation via self-reports is fraught with problems, especially among children. Behavioral observation provides an ecologically valid alternative for measuring anger regulation. The present study uses data from two waves of a longitudinal study to present a behavioral observation approach for measuring anger regulation in middle childhood. At T1, 599 children from Germany (6-10 years old) were observed during an anger eliciting task, and the use of anger regulation strategies was coded. At T2, 3 years later, the observation was repeated with an age-appropriate version of the same task. Partial metric measurement invariance over time demonstrated the structural equivalence of the two versions. Maladaptive anger regulation between the two time points showed moderate stability. Validity was established by showing correlations with aggressive behavior, peer problems, and conduct problems (concurrent and predictive criterion validity). The study presents an ecologically valid and economic approach to assessing anger regulation strategies in situations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Krahe1988,
  author    = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33833},
  year      = {1988},
  abstract  = {Two field studies were conducted lo investigate the influence of observer and victim characteristics on attributions of victim and assailant responsibility in a rape case. In the first study, male and female subjects completed a measure of rape myth acceptance and were presented with a rape account after which they were asked to attribute responsibility to victim and assailant. In the second study, a new sample was asked to attribute responsibility to victim and assailant on the basis of one of two rape accounts in which victim's pre-rape behavior was manipulated. Results showed that both rape myth acceptance and victims' pre-rape behavior in influenced the degree of responsibility attributed to victims and assailants. No significant effects of subject gender were found. A more complex conceptualization is suggested of the link between observer and victim characteristics in social reactions to and evaluations of rape victims.},
  language  = {en}
}