@misc{Krahe1987, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara}, title = {Attributionsstrategien und Identit{\"a}tsdynamik}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-34460}, year = {1987}, abstract = {Inhalt: 1 Selbstwertdienliche Attributionen von Erfolg und Mißerfolg 2 „Selbstbehinderung" zur Vorbeugung gegen Verantwortlichkeit f{\"u}r Mißerfolg 3 Attributionen in der {\"O}ffentlichkeit: Identit{\"a}tsbehauptung durch Selbstdarstellung? 4 Personale Kontrolle und Attribution 5 Geschlechtsrollen-Identit{\"a}t und Attributionen f{\"u}r Erfolg und Mißerfolg 6 Zusammenfassung}, language = {de} } @misc{SixKrahe1980, author = {Six, Bernd and Krah{\´e}, Barbara}, title = {Defensiv-externe Kontroll{\"u}berzeugungen bei der Attribution von Leistungs- und Sozialverhalten}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-45292}, year = {1980}, abstract = {The traditional dichotomy of internal vs. external locus of control is substituted by the more recent distinction between internals, congruent externals, and defensive externals. While internals and congruent externals are predicted to make causal attributions of other persons' performance in accordance with their locus of control irrespective of the nature of the outcome (success vs. failure in achievement situations, positive vs. negative experience in social contacts), defensive externals are expected to vary their causal attributions as a function of outcome. Personal relevance attached to achievement and social contact is included as an additional variable. The presumed correspondence between locus of control and causal attribution - as derived from the conceptualization of locus of control as a personality variable - is not confirmed by our data. The differences expected between the three groups are demonstrated only for achievement-related items. Personal relevance does not significantly modify the relationship between locus of control and causal attribution.}, language = {de} } @misc{Krahe1984, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara}, title = {Der "self-serving bias" in der Attributionsforschung : theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Befunde}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-44220}, year = {1984}, abstract = {Inhalt: 1. Zur Konzeptualisierung des bias in der Attributionstheorie 2. Self-serving bias-Hypothese und informationstheoretische Alternativerkl{\"a}rung:Theoretische Kontroverse und empirische Befunde - Selbstwertbezogene Attributionen eigener Handlungsergebnisse - Kausalattributionen von Erfolg und Mißerfolg bei Wettbewerb und Kooperation - Kausalattributionen f{\"u}r Erfolg und Mißerfolg aus der Beobachterperspektive - Kontradefensive Attributionen und Selbstdarstellungsbed{\"u}rfnisse - Zum Stand der Kognitions-Motivations-Debatte im Lichte der neueren Ergebnisse 3. Ans{\"a}tze zum Abbau des gegenw{\"a}rtigen Theoriedefizits der self-serving bias-Forschung}, language = {de} } @misc{Krahe1985, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara}, title = {Die Zuschreibung von Verantwortlichkeit nach Vergewaltigung : Opfer und T{\"a}ter im Dickicht der attributionstheoretischen Forschung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-34454}, year = {1985}, abstract = {Die Zuschreibung von Verantwortlichkeit an Vergewaltigungsopfer und -t{\"a}ter in sozialen Urteilsprozessen hat sich im Zuge einer st{\"a}rkeren Anwendungsorientierung der attributionstheoretischen Forschung zu einem eigenst{\"a}ndigen Themenschwerpunkt entwickelt. Vor dem Hintergrund eines zunehmenden {\"o}ffentlichen Problembewußtseins ist zu fragen, welchen Beitrag die Attributionsforschung aktuell undpotentiell zur Kl{\"a}rung der Bedingungen und Konsequenzen von Verantwortungsurteilen {\"u}ber Opfer und T{\"a}ter von Vergewaltigungsdelikten leisten kann.}, language = {de} } @misc{KraheSemin1988, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Semin, G{\"u}n R.}, title = {Explaining perceived cross-situational consistency : intuitive psychometrics or semantic mediation?}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33847}, year = {1988}, abstract = {Recent studies at the interface of social cognition and personality theory have stressed lay persons' ability to 'function as intuitive psychometricians' (Epstein and Teraspulsky, 1986). This research argues that lay persons not only show a substantial degree of accuracy in estimating cross-situational generality of behaviour, but also take into account principles of aggregation over time. In contrast, it is argued here that lay persons' perceptions of the degree of relatedness of different behaviours are mediated largely by the decontextualized semantic relationships between behavioural descriptions. This argument finds support in two experimental studies which demonstrate that the main source for subjects' judgments of 'cross-situational consistency' can be found in an abstracted knowledge base which is represented and mediated through language. The implications of the findings are drawn out for personality research. in particular with reference to domain and item selection in questionnaires for research.}, language = {en} } @misc{Krahe1989, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara}, title = {Faking personality profiles on a standard personality inventory}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-34486}, year = {1989}, abstract = {A study is reported which investigates the fakeability of personality profiles as measured by a standard personality inventory, the Freiburger Pers{\"o}nlichkeitsinventar (FPI). Unlike previous studies investigating laypersons' ability to fake a global good or bad impression, the present study examined individuals' ability to fake a specific personality profile. Four groups of subjects were instructed to fake their FPI scores so as to present themselves as high vs low scorers on the "social orientation" dimension or high vs low scorers on the "achievement orientation" dimension. The results clearly demonstrate that subjects are successful in manipulating their scores on the critical dimensions according to instruction. Moreover, they also fake related scales in a way that corroborates the intended image of a person with a high (or low) achievement (or social) orientation. The overall pattern of results reveals that subjects were able to distort their responses in a way that reflects their intuitive understanding of the dimensional structure of the FPI. The implications of the present findings for the use of personality inventories as valid diagnostic instruments are discussed.}, language = {en} } @misc{KraheKundrotas1992, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Kundrotas, Silvia}, title = {Glaubw{\"u}rdigkeitsbeurteilung bei Vergewaltigungsanzeigen : ein aussagenanalytisches Feldexperiment}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-34300}, year = {1992}, abstract = {Die Studie untersucht die Frage, ob sich anhand eines bereits bei kindlichen Zeugenaussagen bew{\"a}hrten Katalogs von Glaubhaftigkeitskriterien zwischen wahren und falschen Vergewaltigungsanzeigen unterscheiden l{\"a}ßt. Das Fallmaterial bestand aus dreißig authentischen Vernehmungsprotokollen, von denen je die H{\"a}lfte eingestandene Falschaussagen bzw. anhand von T{\"a}tergest{\"a}ndnissen oder Indizien als wahr klassifizierte Aussagen waren. Erfahrene Polizeibeamte aus dem Bereich Sexualstraftaten (N = 30) beurteilten diese F{\"a}lle anhand des Kriterienkatalogs von Steiler und K{\"o}hnken (1989) und gaben ein abschließendes Urteil {\"u}ber die Glaubw{\"u}rdigkeit jedes Falles ab. Eine zweite Gruppe von Polizeibeamten (N=22) beurteilte die F{\"a}lle ohne R{\"u}ckgriff auf Realkennzeichen als wahr bzw, falsch. Die diskriminanzanalytische Auswertung der Ergebnisse zeigt, daß der Kriterienkatalog insgesamt gut dazu geeignet ist, zwischen wahren und falschen Vergewaltigungsanzeigen zu differenzieren. Die Ergebnisse der schrittweisen Diskriminanzanalyse zeigen dar{\"u}ber hinaus, welche Glaubhaftigkeitskriterien im einzelnen einen signifikanten Beitrag zur Trennung zwischen Wahr- und Falschaussagen leisten. Der h{\"o}here Prozentsatz korrekter Klassifikationen in der Gruppe, die die Realkennzeichen verwendete, erreichte allerdings nur knapp statistische Signifikanz. Insgesamt st{\"u}tzt die vorliegende Studie die Grundannahme der Aussagenanalyse, daß die Analyse der sprachlichen Merkmale einer Aussage einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur Beurteilung des Wahrheitsgehalts einer Anzeige leisten kann.}, language = {de} } @misc{SixKrahe1984, author = {Six, Bernd and Krah{\´e}, Barbara}, title = {Implicit psychologists' estimates of attitude-behaviour consistencies}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-34427}, year = {1984}, abstract = {To investigate the relationship between implicit psychological hypotheses and explicit empirical findings, summaries of twenty published studies on attitude-behaviour consistency were presented to a sample of forty-eight psychology undergraduates. Subjects were asked to estimate the percentage of agreement between attitudes and behaviour obtained by each study. Correlations between subjects' covariation judgements and empirically obtained attitude-behaviour consistencies were minimal and nonsignificant. Results are discussed in the light of more recent research on attitudebehaviour relationship.}, language = {en} } @misc{KraheSemin1989, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Semin, G{\"u}n R.}, title = {In search of explanations : a rejoinder to Borkenau}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33859}, year = {1989}, abstract = {The main points raised by Borkenau against our challenge of the 'intuitive psychometrics' view of personality judgements are discussed, in particular his example of the link between school grades and intelligence. It is argued that the semantic similarity interpretation advanced in our paper is more adequate and more parsimonious than explanations in terms of psychometric reasoning.}, language = {en} } @misc{KraheSemin1987, author = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Semin, G{\"u}n R.}, title = {Lay conceptions of personality : eliciting tiers of a scientific conception of personality}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33827}, year = {1987}, abstract = {Two studies are reported which examine the availability of scientific propositions of personality in lay conceptions of personality. It is argued from a social constructivist perspective that models of personality must derive from and refer to lay conceptions of persons. Eysenck's trait-type model of introversion-extroversion, containing specific propositions about phenotypic and genotypic differences between extraverts and introverts, was utilized as the scientific model of personality and its availability in lay conceptions of personality was examined in two studies. In the first study, subjects were presented with a genotypic characterization of either an introvert or an extravert target person and asked to infer corresponding phenotypic differences. In the second study, the inference process was reversed with subjects being asked to infer genotypic characteristics of introverts versus extraverts on the basis of phenotypic target person descriptions of the two types. Results from both studies show a high degree of accuracy in subjects' inferences, suggesting that laypersons have well-formed conceptions about personality containing 'higher-order' psychogenetic propositions corresponding to Eysenck's trait-type model. The implications of the findings for theory construction are discussed.}, language = {en} }