@article{MartinezGarvonBohnhoffMencinetal.2019, author = {Martinez-Garvon, Patricia and Bohnhoff, Marco and Mencin, David and Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Dresen, Georg and Hodgkinson, Kathleen and Nurlu, Murat and Kadirioglu, Filiz Tuba and Kartal, Recai Feyiz}, title = {Slow strain release along the eastern Marmara region offshore Istanbul in conjunction with enhanced local seismic moment release}, series = {Earth \& planetary science letters}, volume = {510}, journal = {Earth \& planetary science letters}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0012-821X}, doi = {10.1016/j.epsl.2019.01.001}, pages = {209 -- 218}, year = {2019}, abstract = {We analyze a large transient strainmeter signal recorded at 62.5 m depth along the southern shore of the eastern Sea of Marmara region in northwestern Turkey. This region represents a passage of stress transfer from the Izmit rupture to the Marmara seismic gap. The strain signal was recorded at the Esenkoy site by one of the ICDP-GONAF (International Continental Drilling Programme - Geophysical Observatory at the North Anatolian Fault) strainmeters on the Armutlu peninsula with a maximum amplitude of 5 microstrain and lasting about 50 days. The onset of the strain signal coincided with the origin time of a M-w 4.4 earthquake offshore Yalova, which occurred as part of a seismic sequence including eight M-w >= 3.5 earthquakes. The Mw 4.4 event occurred at a distance of about 30 km from Esenkoy on June 25th 2016 representing the largest earthquake in this region since 2008. Before the event, the maximum horizontal strain was subparallel to the regional maximum horizontal stress derived from stress inversion of local seismicity. During the strain transient, we observe a clockwise rotation in the local horizontal strain field of about 20 degrees. The strain signal does not correlate with known environmental parameters such as annual changes of sea level, rainfall or temperature. The strain signal could indicate local slow slip on the Cinarcik fault and thus a transfer of stress to the eastern Marmara seismic gap.}, language = {en} } @article{KwiatekSaarnoAderetal.2019, author = {Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Saarno, Tero and Ader, Thomas and Bl{\"u}mle, Felix and Bohnhoff, Marco and Chendorain, Michael and Dresen, Georg and Heikkinen, Pekka and Kukkonen, Ilmo and Leary, Peter and Leonhardt, Maria and Malin, Peter and Martinez-Garzon, Patricia and Passmore, Kevin and Passmore, Paul and Valenzuela, Sergio and Wollin, Christopher}, title = {Controlling fluid-induced seismicity during a 6.1-km-deep geothermal stimulation in Finland}, series = {Science Advances}, volume = {5}, journal = {Science Advances}, number = {5}, publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science}, address = {Washington}, issn = {2375-2548}, doi = {10.1126/sciadv.aav7224}, pages = {11}, year = {2019}, abstract = {We show that near-real-time seismic monitoring of fluid injection allowed control of induced earthquakes during the stimulation of a 6.1-km-deep geothermal well near Helsinki, Finland. A total of 18,160 m(3) of fresh water was pumped into crystalline rocks over 49 days in June to July 2018. Seismic monitoring was performed with a 24-station borehole seismometer network. Using near-real-time information on induced-earthquake rates, locations, magnitudes, and evolution of seismic and hydraulic energy, pumping was either stopped or varied-in the latter case, between well-head pressures of 60 and 90 MPa and flow rates of 400 and 800 liters/min. This procedure avoided the nucleation of a project-stopping magnitude M-W 2.0 induced earthquake, a limit set by local authorities. Our results suggest a possible physics-based approach to controlling stimulation-induced seismicity in geothermal projects.}, language = {en} } @article{HofmannZimmermannFarkasetal.2019, author = {Hofmann, Hannes and Zimmermann, G{\"u}nter and Farkas, M{\´a}rton P{\´a}l and Huenges, Ernst and Zang, Arno and Leonhardt, Maria and Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Martinez-Garzon, Patricia and Bohnhoff, Marco and Min, Ki-Bok and Fokker, Peter and Westaway, Rob and Bethmann, Falko and Meier, Peter and Yoon, Kern Shin and Choi, JaiWon and Lee, Tae Jong and Kim, Kwang Yeom}, title = {First field application of cyclic soft stimulation at the Pohang Enhanced Geothermal System site in Korea}, series = {Geophysical journal international}, volume = {217}, journal = {Geophysical journal international}, number = {2}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0956-540X}, doi = {10.1093/gji/ggz058}, pages = {926 -- 949}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Large-magnitude fluid-injection induced seismic events are a potential risk for geothermal energy developments worldwide. One potential risk mitigation measure is the application of cyclic injection schemes. After validation at small (laboratory) and meso (mine) scale, the concept has now been applied for the first time at field scale at the Pohang Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) site in Korea. From 7 August until 14 August 2017 a total of 1756 m(3) of surface water was injected into Pohang well PX-1 at flow rates between 1 and 10 l s(-1), with a maximum wellhead pressure (WHP) of 22.8 MPa, according to a site-specific cyclic soft stimulation schedule and traffic light system. A total of 52 induced microearthquakes were detected in real-time during and shortly after the injection, the largest of M-w 1.9. After that event a total of 1771 m(3) of water was produced back from the well over roughly 1 month, during which time no larger-magnitude seismic event was observed. The hydraulic data set exhibits pressure-dependent injectivity increase with fracture opening between 15 and 17 MPa WHP, but no significant permanent transmissivity increase was observed. The maximum magnitude of the induced seismicity during the stimulation period was below the target threshold of M-w 2.0 and additional knowledge about the stimulated reservoir was gained. Additionally, the technical feasibility of cyclic injection at field scale was evaluated. The major factors that limited the maximum earthquake magnitude are believed to be: limiting the injected net fluid volume, flowback after the occurrence of the largest induced seismic event, using a cyclic injection scheme, the application of a traffic light system, and including a priori information from previous investigations and operations in the treatment design.}, language = {en} } @article{BentzMartinezGarzonKwiateketal.2019, author = {Bentz, Stephan and Martinez-Garzon, Patricia and Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Dresen, Georg and Bohnhoff, Marco}, title = {Analysis of Microseismicity Framing M-L > 2.5 Earthquakes at The Geysers Geothermal Field, California}, series = {Journal of geophysical research : Solid earth}, volume = {124}, journal = {Journal of geophysical research : Solid earth}, number = {8}, publisher = {American Geophysical Union}, address = {Washington}, issn = {2169-9313}, doi = {10.1029/2019JB017716}, pages = {8823 -- 8843}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Preparatory mechanisms accompanying or leading to nucleation of larger earthquakes have been observed at both laboratory and field scales, but conditions favoring the occurrence of observable preparatory processes are still largely unknown. In particular, it remains a matter of debate why some earthquakes occur spontaneously without noticeable precursors as opposed to events that are preceded by an extended failure process. In this study, we have generated new high-resolution seismicity catalogs framing the occurrence of 20 M-L > 2.5 earthquakes at The Geysers geothermal field in California. To this end, a seismicity catalog of the 11 days framing each large event was created. We selected 20 sequences sampling different hypocentral depths and hydraulic conditions within the field. Seismic activity and magnitude frequency distributions displayed by the different earthquake sequences are correlated with their location within the reservoir. Sequences located in the northwestern part of the reservoir show overall increased seismic activity and low b values, while the southeastern part is dominated by decreased seismic activity and higher b values. Periods of high injection coincide with high b values and vice versa. These observations potentially reflect varying differential and mean stresses and damage of the reservoir rocks across the field. About 50\% of analyzed sequences exhibit no change in seismicity rate in response to the large main event. However, we find complex waveforms at the onset of the main earthquake, suggesting that small ruptures spontaneously grow into or trigger larger events.}, language = {en} }