@article{StenzelWilliams2021,
  author    = {Stenzel, Kristine and Williams, Nicholas},
  title     = {Toward an interactional approach to multilingualism},
  series = {Language \& communication : an interdisciplinary journal},
  volume    = {80},
  journal   = {Language \& communication : an interdisciplinary journal},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0271-5309},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.langcom.2021.05.010},
  pages     = {136 -- 164},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This study examines language ideologies and communicative practices in the multilingual Vaupes region of northwestern Amazonia. Following a comparative overview of the Vaupes as a 'small-scale' language ecology, it discusses claims from existing ethnographic work on the region in light of data from a corpus of video-recordings of sociolinguistic interviews and spontaneous everyday conversations. It shows how a practice-based and interdisciplinary approach combining language documentation methodology and ethnographic, structural linguistic, and interactional perspectives can contribute to understanding of macro and micro aspects of multilingualism, thus contributing to future work on the Vaupes, typologies of small-scale multilingual ecologies, and language contact research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Selting2012,
  author    = {Selting, Margret},
  title     = {Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays},
  series = {Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0378-2166},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005},
  pages     = {387 -- 415},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {The paper investigates cases in which the recipients' affiliation with the speaker's affect in telling a complaint story is not (or not only) expressed through assessments or shorter comments or response cries but (also) through tellings of a complaint story of their own. After first complaint stories, next speakers may continue with similar or contrasting second or subsequent stories, in order to accomplish affiliation with the prior speaker's story and affective stance. Similar stories are contextualized as such with similar footings or similar embodiments; contrasting stories are contextualized as such with other footings and/or other embodiments. Nevertheless, not all subsequent stories are receipted as affiliative: the study of a deviant case shows how a subsequent story can be produced and treated as disaffiliative.},
  language  = {en}
}