@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Los tiempos verbales y sus denominaciones en las gram{\´a}ticas espa{\~n}olas desde el siglo XVII hasta el siglo XX},
  series = {M{\´e}todos y resultados actuales en Historiograf{\´i}a de la Ling{\"u}{\´i}stica},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {M{\´e}todos y resultados actuales en Historiograf{\´i}a de la Ling{\"u}{\´i}stica},
  publisher = {Nodus Publikationen},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-89323-020-4},
  pages     = {349 -- 360},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In this paper, the names of the Spanish verb forms are examined with emphasis on the forms of the so-called past tense and the relationship of their conceptual potential to the function of these forms. The names of the verb forms in Spanish grammars from the 17th to the 20th century are determined by Latin grammar, but also by theoretical positions of their authors.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}