@article{KrampeKlieglMayretal.2000,
  author    = {Krampe, Ralf-Thomas and Kliegl, Reinhold and Mayr, Ulrich and Engbert, Ralf and Vorberg, D.},
  title     = {The fast and the slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production : parallel versus integrated timing},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LaubrockKliegl2015,
  author    = {Laubrock, Jochen and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The eye-voice span during reading aloud},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  number    = {1432},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01432},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Although eye movements during reading are modulated by cognitive processing demands, they also reflect visual sampling of the input, and possibly preparation of output for speech or the inner voice. By simultaneously recording eye movements and the voice during reading aloud, we obtained an output measure that constrains the length of time spent on cognitive processing. Here we investigate the dynamics of the eye-voice span (EVS), the distance between eye and voice. We show that the EVS is regulated immediately during fixation of a word by either increasing fixation duration or programming a regressive eye movement against the reading direction. EVS size at the beginning of a fixation was positively correlated with the likelihood of regressions and refixations. Regression probability was further increased if the EVS was still large at the end of a fixation: if adjustment of fixation duration did not sufficiently reduce the EVS during a fixation, then a regression rather than a refixation followed with high probability. We further show that the EVS can help understand cognitive influences on fixation duration during reading: in mixed model analyses, the EVS was a stronger predictor of fixation durations than either word frequency or word length. The EVS modulated the influence of several other predictors on single fixation durations (SFDs). For example, word-N frequency effects were larger with a large EVS, especially when word N-1 frequency was low. Finally, a comparison of SFDs during oral and silent reading showed that reading is governed by similar principles in both reading modes, although EVS maintenance and articulatory processing also cause some differences. In summary, the EVS is regulated by adjusting fixation duration and/or by programming a regressive eye movement when the EVS gets too large. Overall, the EVS appears to be directly related to updating of the working memory buffer during reading.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LaubrockKliegl2015,
  author    = {Laubrock, Jochen and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The eye-voice span during reading aloud},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01437},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Although eye movements during reading are modulated by cognitive processing demands, they also reflect visual sampling of the input, and possibly preparation of output for speech or the inner voice. By simultaneously recording eye movements and the voice during reading aloud, we obtained an output measure that constrains the length of time spent on cognitive processing. Here we investigate the dynamics of the eye-voice span (EVS), the distance between eye and voice. We show that the EVS is regulated immediately during fixation of a word by either increasing fixation duration or programming a regressive eye movement against the reading direction. EVS size at the beginning of a fixation was positively correlated with the likelihood of regressions and refixations. Regression probability was further increased if the EVS was still large at the end of a fixation: if adjustment of fixation duration did not sufficiently reduce the EVS during a fixation, then a regression rather than a refixation followed with high probability. We further show that the EVS can help understand cognitive influences on fixation duration during reading: in mixed model analyses, the EVS was a stronger predictor of fixation durations than either word frequency or word length. The EVS modulated the influence of several other predictors on single fixation durations (SFDs). For example, word-N frequency effects were larger with a large EVS, especially when word N-1 frequency was low. Finally, a comparison of SFDs during oral and silent reading showed that reading is governed by similar principles in both reading modes, although EVS maintenance and articulatory processing also cause some differences. In summary, the EVS is regulated by adjusting fixation duration and/or by programming a regressive eye movement when the EVS gets too large. Overall, the EVS appears to be directly related to updating of the working memory buffer during reading.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VerhaeghenKliegl2000,
  author    = {Verhaeghen, Paul and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The effects of learning a new algorithm on asymptotic accuracy and execution speed in old age : a reanalysis},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrampeEngbertKliegl2002,
  author    = {Krampe, Ralf-Thomas and Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The effects of expertise and age on rhythm production : adaptations to timing and sequencing constraints},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BaayenVasishthKliegletal.2017,
  author    = {Baayen, Harald R. and Vasishth, Shravan and Kliegl, Reinhold and Bates, Douglas},
  title     = {The cave of shadows: Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models},
  series = {Journal of memory and language},
  volume    = {94},
  journal   = {Journal of memory and language},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {San Diego},
  issn      = {0749-596X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.006},
  pages     = {206 -- 234},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglMayrJunkeretal.1999,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Mayr, Ulrich and Junker, Martina and Fanselow, Gisbert},
  title     = {Testing age invariance in language processes},
  isbn      = {0-7923-8526-8},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ScheffczykKrampeEngbertetal.1997,
  author    = {Scheffczyk, Christian and Krampe, Ralf-Thomas and Engbert, Ralf and Rosenblum, Michael and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Tempo-induced transitions in polyrhythmic hand movements},
  year      = {1997},
  abstract  = {We investigate the cognitive control in polyrhythmic hand movements as a model paradigm for bimanual coordination. Using a symbolic coding of the recorded time series, we demonstrate the existence of qualitative transitions induced by experimental manipulation of the tempo. A nonlinear model with delayed feedback control is proposed, which accounts for these dynamical transitions in terms of bifurcations resulting from variation of the external control parameter. Furthermore, it is shown that transitions can also be observed due to fluctuations in the timing control level. We conclude that the complexity of coordinated bimanual movements results from interactions between nonlinear control mechanisms with delayed feedback and stochastic timing components.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglMayr2000,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Mayr, Ulrich},
  title     = {Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FanselowKlieglSchlesewsky2008,
  author    = {Fanselow, Gisbert and Kliegl, Reinhold and Schlesewsky, Matthias},
  title     = {Syntactic variation in German wh-questions},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}