@article{KlieglNuthmannEngbert2006,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Nuthmann, Antje and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {Tracking the mind during reading : the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations},
  issn      = {0096-3445},
  doi       = {10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Reading requires the orchestration of visual, attentional, language-related, and oculomotor processing constraints. This study replicates previous effects of frequency, predictability, and length of fixated words on fixation durations in natural reading and demonstrates new effects of these variables related to previous and next words. Results are based on fixation durations recorded from 222 persons, each reading 144 sentences. Such evidence for distributed processing of words across fixation durations challenges psycholinguistic immediacy-of-processing and eye- mind assumptions. Most of the time the mind processes several words in parallel at different perceptual and cognitive levels. Eye movements can help to unravel these processes},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kliegl2007,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Towards a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading : a reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RolfsKlieglEngbert2008,
  author    = {Rolfs, Martin and Kliegl, Reinhold and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {Toward a model of microsaccade generation : the case of microsaccadic inhibition},
  issn      = {1534-7362},
  doi       = {10.1167/8.11.5},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MayrKlieglKrampe2005,
  author    = {Mayr, Ulrich and Kliegl, Reinhold and Krampe, Ralf-Thomas},
  title     = {Timing, sequencing and executive control in repetitive movement production},
  issn      = {0096-1523},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The authors demonstrate that the timing and sequencing of target durations require low-level timing and executive control. Sixteen young (M-age = 19 years) and 16 older (M-age = 70 years) adults participated in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, individual mean-variance functions for low-level timing (isochronous tapping) and the sequencing of multiple targets (rhythm production) revealed (a) a dissociation of low-level timing and sequencing in both age groups, (b) negligible age differences for low-level timing, and (c) large age differences for sequencing. Experiment 2 supported the distinction between low-level timing and executive functions: Selection against a dominant rhythm and switching between rhythms impaired performances in both age groups and induced pronounced perseveration of the dominant pattern in older adults.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglMayrKrampe1994,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Mayr, Ulrich and Krampe, Ralf-Thomas},
  title     = {Time-accuracy functions for the determination of person and process differences : an application to cognitive aging},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchlesewskyFanselowKliegletal.2000,
  author    = {Schlesewsky, Matthias and Fanselow, Gisbert and Kliegl, Reinhold and Krems, J.},
  title     = {The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous Wh-questions in german},
  isbn      = {0-7923-6104- 0},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VolbrechtKliegl1998,
  author    = {Volbrecht, V. and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The perception of blackness : an historical and contemporary review},
  isbn      = {3-11-015431-5},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NuthmannEngbertKliegl2007,
  author    = {Nuthmann, Antje and Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The IOVP-effect in mindless reading : Experiment and modeling},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.005},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Fixation durations in reading are longer for within-word fixation positions close to word center than for positions near word boundaries. This counterintuitive result was termed the Inverted-Optimal Viewing Position (IOVP) effect. We proposed an explanation of the effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations [Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., \& Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217], that suggests that the IOVP effect is not related to word processing. Here we demonstrate the existence of an IOVP effect in "mindless reading", a G-string scanning task. We compare the results from experimental data with results obtained from computer simulations of a simple model of the IOVP effect and discuss alternative accounts. We conclude that oculornotor errors, which often induce mislocalized fixations, represent the most important source of the IOVP effect. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OhlBrandtKliegl2013,
  author    = {Ohl, Sven and Brandt, Stephan A. and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The generation of secondary saccades without postsaccadic visual feedback},
  series = {Journal of vision},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Journal of vision},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Opthalmology},
  address   = {Rockville},
  issn      = {1534-7362},
  doi       = {10.1167/13.5.11},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Primary saccades are often followed by small secondary saccades, which are generally thought to reduce the distance between the saccade endpoint and target location. Accumulated evidence demonstrates that secondary saccades are subject to various influences, among which retinal feedback during postsaccadic fixation constitutes only one important signal. Recently, we reported that target eccentricity and an orientation bias influence the generation of secondary saccades. In the present study, we examine secondary saccades in the absence of postsaccadic visual feedback. Although extraretinal signals (e.g., efference copy) have received widespread attention in eye-movement studies, it is still unclear whether an extraretinal error signal contributes to the programming of secondary saccades. We have observed that secondary saccade latency and amplitude depend on primary saccade error despite the absence of postsaccadic visual feedback. Strong evidence for an extraretinal error signal influencing secondary saccade programming is given by the observation that secondary saccades are more likely to be oriented in a direction opposite to the primary saccade as primary saccade error shifts from target undershoot to overshoot. We further show how the functional relationship between primary saccade landing position and secondary saccade characteristics varies as a function of target eccentricity. We propose that initial target eccentricity and an extraretinal error signal codetermine the postsaccadic activity distribution in the saccadic motor map when no visual feedback is available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngbertKliegl2003,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The game of word skipping : who are the competitors?},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Computational models such as E-Z Reader and SWIFT are ideal theoretical tools to test quantitatively our current understanding of eye-movement control in reading. Here we present a mathematical analysis of word skipping in the E-Z Reader model by semianalytic methods, to highlight the differences in current modeling approaches. In E-Z Reader, the word identification system must outperform the oculomotor system to induce word skipping. In SWIFT, there is competition among words to be selected as a saccade target. We conclude that it is the question of competitors in the "game" of word skipping that must be solved in eye movement research},
  language  = {en}
}