@article{ReuschlTiberiusFilseretal.2021,
  author    = {Reuschl, Andreas and Tiberius, Victor and Filser, Matthias and Qiu, Yixin},
  title     = {Value configurations in sharing economy business models},
  series = {Review of managerial science},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Review of managerial science},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1863-6683},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11846-020-00433-w},
  pages     = {89 -- 112},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The sharing economy gains momentum and develops a major economic impact on traditional markets and firms. However, only rudimentary theoretical and empirical insights exist on how sharing networks, i.e., focal firms, shared goods providers and customers, create and capture value in their sharing-based business models. We conduct a qualitative study to find key differences in sharing-based business models that are decisive for their value configurations. Our results show that (1) customization versus standardization of shared goods and (2) the centralization versus particularization of property rights over the shared goods are two important dimensions to distinguish value configurations. A second, quantitative study confirms the visibility and relevance of these dimensions to customers. We discuss strategic options for focal firms to design value configurations regarding the two dimensions to optimize value creation and value capture in sharing networks. Firms can use this two-dimensional search grid to explore untapped opportunities in the sharing economy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RojahnWeberGronau2023,
  author    = {Rojahn, Marcel and Weber, Edzard and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Towards a standardization in scheduling models},
  series = {International journal of industrial and systems engineering},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {International journal of industrial and systems engineering},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises},
  address   = {Gen{\`e}ve},
  issn      = {1748-5037},
  pages     = {401 -- 408},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Terminology is a critical instrument for each researcher. Different terminologies for the same research object may arise in different research communities. By this inconsistency, many synergistic effects get lost. Theories and models will be more understandable and reusable if a common terminology is applied. This paper examines the terminological (in)consistence for the research field of job-shop scheduling by a literature review. There is an enormous variety in the choice of terms and mathematical notation for the same concept. The comparability, reusability and combinability of scheduling methods is unnecessarily hampered by the arbitrary use of homonyms and synonyms. The acceptance in the community of used variables and notation forms is shown by means of a compliance quotient. This is proven by the evaluation of 240 scientific publications on planning methods.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GrimmBergerBastiansenetal.2006,
  author    = {Grimm, Volker and Berger, Uta and Bastiansen, Finn and Eliassen, Sigrunn and Ginot, Vincent and Giske, Jarl and Goss-Custard, John and Grand, Tamara and Heinz, Simone K. and Huse, Geir and Huth, Andreas and Jepsen, Jane U. and Jorgensen, Christian and Mooij, Wolf M. and Mueller, Birgit and Piou, Cyril and Railsback, Steven Floyd and Robbins, Andrew M. and Robbins, Martha M. and Rossmanith, Eva and Rueger, Nadja and Strand, Espen and Souissi, Sami and Stillman, Richard A. and Vabo, Rune and Visser, Ute and DeAngelis, Donald L.},
  title     = {A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models},
  series = {Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog},
  volume    = {198},
  journal   = {Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0304-3800},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023},
  pages     = {115 -- 126},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Simulation models that describe autonomous individual organisms (individual based models, IBM) or agents (agent-based models, ABM) have become a widely used tool, not only in ecology, but also in many other disciplines dealing with complex systems made up of autonomous entities. However, there is no standard protocol for describing such simulation models, which can make them difficult to understand and to duplicate. This paper presents a proposed standard protocol, ODD, for describing IBMs and ABMs, developed and tested by 28 modellers who cover a wide range of fields within ecology. This protocol consists of three blocks (Overview, Design concepts, and Details), which are subdivided into seven elements: Purpose, State variables and scales, Process overview and scheduling, Design concepts, Initialization, Input, and Submodels. We explain which aspects of a model should be described in each element, and we present an example to illustrate the protocol in use. In addition, 19 examples are available in an Online Appendix. We consider ODD as a first step for establishing a more detailed common format of the description of IBMs and ABMs. Once initiated, the protocol will hopefully evolve as it becomes used by a sufficiently large proportion of modellers. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hildebrandt2014,
  author    = {Hildebrandt, Dieter},
  title     = {A software reference architecture for service-oriented 3D geovisualization systems},
  series = {ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2220-9964},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijgi3041445},
  pages     = {1445 -- 1490},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}