@article{Stoppel2021,
  author    = {Stoppel, Relika},
  title     = {Alcohol availability and alcohol-attributable mortality},
  series = {CESifo economic studies : CESifo, a joint initiative of the University of Munich's Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute},
  volume    = {67},
  journal   = {CESifo economic studies : CESifo, a joint initiative of the University of Munich's Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1610-241X},
  doi       = {10.1093/cesifo/ifab008},
  pages     = {463 -- 487},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {It is commonly known that irresponsible alcohol use can have adverse effects. For some people, it results in health problems, for others in productivity loss, and some experience the worst possible outcome of alcohol misuse - death. This paper estimates the effect of reduced alcohol sales hours on alcohol-attributable mortality (AAM) in Estonia. Using novel mortality data from 1997 to 2015, this paper analyzes the effect of alcohol sales policies at both the county level and the country level. By applying the difference-in-differences method and the ARIMA model, this paper finds that the alcohol sales policy reduced AAM to between 1.710 and 2.401 deaths per 100,000 per month, which equals a reduction of 31\% to 40\% in AAM deaths. These findings suggest that individuals who are the most at risk of dying from alcohol-attributable causes of death benefit remarkably from reduced alcohol availability.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KhudairMarcuzziNgetal.2022,
  author    = {Khudair, Mohammed and Marcuzzi, Anna and Ng, Kwok and Tempest, Gavin Daniel and Bartoš, František and Peric, Ratko and Maier, Maximilian and Beccia, Flavia and Boccia, Stefania and Brandes, Mirko and Cardon, Greet and Carlin, Angela and Castagna, Carolina and Chaabene, Helmi and Chalkley, Anna and Ciaccioni, Simone and Cieślińska-Świder, Joanna and Čingienė, Vilma and Cortis, Cristina and Corvino, Chiara and de Geus, Eco J. C. and Di Baldassarre, Angela and Di Credico, Andrea and Drid, Patrik and Tarazaga, Rosa Ma Fern{\´a}ndez and Gall{\`e}, Francesca and S{\´a}nchez, Esther Garcia and Gebremariam, Mekdes and Ghinassi, Barbara and Goudas, Marios and Hayes, Grainne and Honorio, Samuel and Izzicupo, Pascal and Jahre, Henriette and Jelsma, Judith and Juric, Petra and Kolovelonis, Athanasios and Kongsvold, Atle and Kouidi, Evangelia and Mansergh, Fiona and Masanovic, Bojan and Mekonnen, Teferi and Mork, Paul Jarle and Murphy, Marie and O'Hara, Kelly and Torun, Ayse Ozbil and Palumbo, Federico and Popovic, Stevo and Prieske, Olaf and Puharic, Zrinka and Ribeiro, Jos{\´e} Carlos and Rumbold, Penny Louise Sheena and Sandu, Petru and Soric, Maroje and Stavnsbo, Mette and Syrmpas, Ioannis and van der Ploeg, Hidde P. and Van Hoye, Aur{\´e}lie and Vilela, Sofia and Woods, Catherine and Wunsch, Kathrin and Caprinica, Laura and MacDonncha, Ciaran and Ling, Fiona Chun Man},
  title     = {DE-PASS Best Evidence Statement (BESt): modifiable determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents aged 5-19 years-a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis},
  series = {BMJ open},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {BMJ open},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {BMJ Publishing Group},
  address   = {London},
  organization    = {DE-PASS},
  issn      = {2044-6055},
  doi       = {10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059202},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Introduction Physical activity among children and adolescents remains insufficient, despite the substantial efforts made by researchers and policymakers. Identifying and furthering our understanding of potential modifiable determinants of physical activity behaviour (PAB) and sedentary behaviour (SB) is crucial for the development of interventions that promote a shift from SB to PAB. The current protocol details the process through which a series of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses (MAs) will be conducted to produce a best-evidence statement (BESt) and inform policymakers. The overall aim is to identify modifiable determinants that are associated with changes in PAB and SB in children and adolescents (aged 5-19 years) and to quantify their effect on, or association with, PAB/SB. Methods and analysis A search will be performed in MEDLINE, SportDiscus, Web of Science, PsychINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) that investigate the effect of interventions on PAB/SB and longitudinal studies that investigate the associations between modifiable determinants and PAB/SB at multiple time points will be sought. Risk of bias assessments will be performed using adapted versions of Cochrane's RoB V.2.0 and ROBINS-I tools for RCTs and CTs, respectively, and an adapted version of the National Institute of Health's tool for longitudinal studies. Data will be synthesised narratively and, where possible, MAs will be performed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Modifiable determinants will be discussed considering the settings in which they were investigated and the PAB/SB measurement methods used. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is needed as no primary data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences where possible. The BESt will also be shared with policy makers within the DE-PASS consortium in the first instance. Systematic review registration CRD42021282874.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KuehneJeglinskiMende2023,
  author    = {K{\"u}hne, Katharina and Jeglinski-Mende, Melinda A.},
  title     = {Refraining from interaction can decrease fear of physical closeness during COVID-19},
  series = {Scientific reports},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Scientific reports},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Nature portfolio},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2045-2322},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-023-34667-x},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Perception of peripersonal space (PPS) and interpersonal distance (IPD) has been shown to be modified by external factors such as perceived danger, the use of tools, and social factors. Especially in times of social distancing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is vital to study factors that modify PPS and IPD. The present work addresses the question of whether wearing a face mask as a protection tool and social interaction impact the perception of IPD. We tested estimated IPD in pictures at three distances: 50 cm, 90 cm, and 150 cm in both social interaction (shaking hands) and without interaction and when the two people in the pictures wore a face mask or not. Data from 60 subjects were analyzed in a linear mixed model (on both difference in distance estimation to the depicted distance and in absolute distance estimation) and in a 3 (distance: 50, 90, 150) x 2 (interaction: no interaction, shake hands), x 2 face mask (no mask, mask) rmANOVA on distance estimation difference. All analyses showed that at a distance of 50 and 90 cm, participants generally underestimated the IPD while at an IPD of 150 cm, participants overestimated the distance. This could be grounded in perceived danger and avoidance behavior at closer distances, while the wider distance between persons was not perceived as dangerous. Our findings at an IPD of 90 cm show that social interaction has the largest effect at the border of our PPS, while the face mask did not affect social interaction at either distance. In addition, the ANOVA results indicate that when no social interaction was displayed, participants felt less unsafe when depicted persons wore a face mask at distances of 90 and 150 cm. This shows that participants are on the one hand aware of the given safety measures and internalized them; on the other hand, that refraining from physical social interaction helps to get close to other persons.},
  language  = {en}
}