@article{JannJantzKuehneetal.2018,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Jantz, Bastian and Kuehne, Alexander and Schulze-Gabrechten, Lena},
  title     = {The Flood Crisis in Germany 2013},
  series = {Societal Security and Crisis Management},
  journal   = {Societal Security and Crisis Management},
  publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-319-92303-1},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-319-92303-1_4},
  pages     = {75 -- 93},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In 2013, large floods affected Germany heavily. The natural disaster transcended jurisdictional and organisational boundaries, necessitating a coordinative effort by disaster relief forces and their administrative and political leadership. In the aftermath, politicians and experts praised the improvement of the German system of crisis management, also in direct comparison with the response to the last German "flood of the century" of 2002. This chapter takes a public policy and organisational perspective to analyse the German disaster relief governance throughout all four crisis management phases. By highlighting the central features of the German governance arrangements and the main organisational changes implemented in reaction to the previous flood in 2002, we find that Whole-of-Government approaches are increasingly used by the federal and L{\"a}nder government.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JantzKlenkLarsenetal.2018,
  author    = {Jantz, Bastian and Klenk, Tanja and Larsen, Flemming and Wiggan, Jay},
  title     = {Marketization and Varieties of Accountability Relationships in Employment Services},
  series = {Administration \& society},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Administration \& society},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0095-3997},
  doi       = {10.1177/0095399715581622},
  pages     = {321 -- 345},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In the past decade, European countries have contracted out public employment service functions to activate working-age benefit clients. There has been limited discussion of how contracting out shapes the accountability of employment services or is shaped by alternative democratic, administrative, or network forms of accountability. This article examines employment service accountability in Germany, Denmark, and Great Britain. We find that market accountability instruments are additional instruments, not replacements. The findings highlight the importance of administrative and political instruments in legitimizing marketized service provision and shed light on the processes that lead to the development of a hybrid accountability model.},
  language  = {en}
}