@article{ApeltDosdallTrautwein2020,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Dosdall, Henrik and Trautwein, Ray},
  title     = {Wie das Recht in die Organisation kommt - Die Akteur*innen des Antidiskriminierungsrechts in m{\"a}nnlich gepr{\"a}gten Organisationen},
  series = {Kritische Justiz},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Kritische Justiz},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  issn      = {0023-4834},
  doi       = {10.5771/0023-4834-2020-4-445},
  pages     = {445 -- 456},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BuechnerDosdall2021,
  author    = {B{\"u}chner, Stefanie and Dosdall, Henrik},
  title     = {Organisation und Algorithmus},
  series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  volume    = {73},
  journal   = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  number    = {Suppl. 1},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {0023-2653},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11577-021-00752-0},
  pages     = {333 -- 357},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This article analyzes how organizations endow algorithms, which we understand as digital formats of observation, with agency, thus rendering them actionable. Our main argument is that the relevance of digital observation formats results from how organizations embed them in their decision architectures. We demonstrate this using the example of the Austrian Public Employment Service (AMS), which introduced an algorithm in 2018 to evaluate the chances of unemployed persons being reintegrated in the labor market. In this regard, the AMS algorithm serves as an exemplary case for the current trend among public organizations to harness algorithms for distributing limited resources in a purportedly more efficient way. To reconstruct how this is achieved, we delineate how the AMS algorithm categorizes, compares, and evaluates persons. Building on this, we demonstrate how the algorithmic model is integrated into the organizational decision architecture and thereby made actionable. In conclusion, algorithmic models like the AMS algorithm also pose a challenge for organizations because they mute chances for realizing organizational learning. We substantiate this argument with regard to the role of coproduction and the absence of clear causality in the field of (re)integrating unemployed persons in the labor market.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Dosdall2018,
  author    = {Dosdall, Henrik},
  title     = {Organisationsversagen und NSU-Ermittlungen},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0340-1804},
  doi       = {10.1515/zfsoz-2018-0125},
  pages     = {402 -- 417},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Der vorliegende Artikel analysiert aus organisationssoziologischer Perspektive, warum die polizeilichen NSU-Ermittlungen auch nach jahrelang erfolglosen Untersuchungen im Bereich der Organisierten Kriminalit{\"a}t eine rechtsextremistische Urheberschaft der NSU-Morde ausschlossen. Um diese Frage zu beantworten, bedient sich der Artikel einer entscheidungstheoretischen Routine- und Lernperspektive. Das mit diesem theoretischen Instrumentarium verfolgte Ziel liegt in der Analyse der Lernobstruktionen der polizeilichen Ermittlungen im NSU-Komplex. Darauf aufbauend werden empirische und analytische Anschlussperspektiven aufgezeigt.},
  language  = {de}
}