@misc{ParrySchlaegelTiedemannetal.2022,
  author    = {Parry, Victor and Schl{\"a}gel, Ulrike E. and Tiedemann, Ralph and Weithoff, Guntram},
  title     = {Behavioural Responses of Defended and Undefended Prey to Their Predator},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {1302},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-57759},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-577594},
  pages     = {14},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Predation is a strong species interaction causing severe harm or death to prey. Thus, prey species have evolved various defence strategies to minimize predation risk, which may be immediate (e.g., a change in behaviour) or transgenerational (morphological defence structures). We studied the behaviour of two strains of a rotiferan prey (Brachionus calyciflorus) that differ in their ability to develop morphological defences in response to their predator Asplanchna brightwellii. Using video analysis, we tested: (a) if two strains differ in their response to predator presence and predator cues when both are undefended; (b) whether defended individuals respond to live predators or their cues; and (c) if the morphological defence (large spines) per se has an effect on the swimming behaviour. We found a clear increase in swimming speed for both undefended strains in predator presence. However, the defended specimens responded neither to the predator presence nor to their cues, showing that they behave indifferently to their predator when they are defended. We did not detect an effect of the spines on the swimming behaviour. Our study demonstrates a complex plastic behaviour of the prey, not only in the presence of their predator, but also with respect to their defence status.},
  language  = {en}
}