@article{SchneiderKutzKapsetal.2020,
  author    = {Schneider, Kathleen and Kutz, Anne and Kaps, Hella and Frank, Ulrike},
  title     = {Dysarthria Impact Profile - D},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  number    = {12},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-479-1},
  issn      = {1866-9085},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-46964},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-469645},
  pages     = {241 -- 246},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Schneider2009,
  author    = {Schneider, Frank},
  title     = {Wohlfahrtsstaatlichkeit in Lateinamerika},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-49148},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2. Die historische Entwicklung der Wohlfahrtsregime in Lateinamerika 3. Strukturen und zentrale Charakteristika lateinamerikanischer Wohlfahrtsproduktion 3.1 Ausgew{\"a}hlte Entwicklungspfade lateinamerikanischer Wohlfahrtsstaaten 3.2. Lateinamerika - ein Wohlfahrtsregime? 4. Exkurs: Wohlfahrtsregime und Geschlechterverh{\"a}ltnisse in Lateinamerika 5. Exkurs: Bildung in Lateinamerika und Wohlfahrtsregime 6. Zusammenfassung Literatur},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{WippertNiedererDriessleinetal.2021,
  author    = {Wippert, Pia-Maria and Niederer, Daniel and Drießlein, David and Beck, Heidrun and Banzer, Winfried Eberhard and Schneider, Christian and Schiltenwolf, Marcus and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Psychosocial Moderators and Mediators of Sensorimotor Exercise in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-54327},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-543277},
  pages     = {1 -- 16},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The effects of exercise interventions on unspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) have been investigated in many studies, but the results are inconclusive regarding exercise types, efficiency, and sustainability. This may be because the influence of psychosocial factors on exercise induced adaptation regarding CLBP is neglected. Therefore, this study assessed psychosocial characteristics, which moderate and mediate the effects of sensorimotor exercise on LBP. A single-blind 3-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted for 12-weeks. Three exercise groups, sensorimotor exercise (SMT), sensorimotor and behavioral training (SMT-BT), and regular routines (CG) were randomly assigned to 662 volunteers. Primary outcomes (pain intensity and disability) and psychosocial characteristics were assessed at baseline (M1) and follow-up (3/6/12/24 weeks, M2-M5). Multiple regression models were used to analyze whether psychosocial characteristics are moderators of the relationship between exercise and pain, meaning that psychosocial factors and exercise interact. Causal mediation analysis were conducted to analyze, whether psychosocial characteristics mediate the exercise effect on pain. A total of 453 participants with intermittent pain (mean age = 39.5 ± 12.2 years, f = 62\%) completed the training. It was shown, that depressive symptomatology (at M4, M5), vital exhaustion (at M4), and perceived social support (at M5) are significant moderators of the relationship between exercise and the reduction of pain intensity. Further depressive mood (at M4), social-satisfaction (at M4), and anxiety (at M5 SMT) significantly moderate the exercise effect on pain disability. The amount of moderation was of clinical relevance. In contrast, there were no psychosocial variables which mediated exercise effects on pain. In conclusion it was shown, that psychosocial variables can be moderators in the relationship between sensorimotor exercise induced adaptation on CLBP which may explain conflicting results in the past regarding the merit of exercise interventions in CLBP. Results suggest further an early identification of psychosocial risk factors by diagnostic tools, which may essential support the planning of personalized exercise therapy. Level of Evidence: Level I. Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS00004977, LOE: I, MiSpEx: grant-number: 080102A/11-14. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML\&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00004977.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{WippertPuschmannDriessleinetal.2017,
  author    = {Wippert, Pia-Maria and Puschmann, Anne-Katrin and Drießlein, David and Arampatzis, Adamantios and Banzer, Winfried and Beck, Heidrun and Schiltenwolf, Marcus and Schmidt, Hendrik and Schneider, Christian and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Development of a risk stratification and prevention index for stratified care in chronic low back pain. Focus: yellow flags (MiSpEx network)},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-403424},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability; early diagnosis and stratification of care remain challenges. Objectives: This article describes the development of a screening tool for the 1-year prognosis of patients with high chronic LBP risk (risk stratification index) and for treatment allocation according to treatment-modifiable yellow flag indicators (risk prevention indices, RPI-S). Methods: Screening tools were derived from a multicentre longitudinal study (n = 1071, age >18, intermittent LBP). The greatest prognostic predictors of 4 flag domains ("pain," "distress," "social-environment," "medical care-environment") were determined using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis. Internal validity and prognosis error were evaluated after 1-year follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curves for discrimination (area under the curve) and cutoff values were determined. Results: The risk stratification index identified persons with increased risk of chronic LBP and accurately estimated expected pain intensity and disability on the Pain Grade Questionnaire (0-100 points) up to 1 year later with an average prognosis error of 15 points. In addition, 3-risk classes were discerned with an accuracy of area under the curve = 0.74 (95\% confidence interval 0.63-0.85). The RPI-S also distinguished persons with potentially modifiable prognostic indicators from 4 flag domains and stratified allocation to biopsychosocial treatments accordingly. Conclusion: The screening tools, developed in compliance with the PROGRESS and TRIPOD statements, revealed good validation and prognostic strength. These tools improve on existing screening tools because of their utility for secondary preventions, incorporation of exercise effect modifiers, exact pain estimations, and personalized allocation to multimodal treatments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{WippertPuschmannDriessleinetal.2020,
  author    = {Wippert, Pia-Maria and Puschmann, Anne-Katrin and Drießlein, David and Banzer, Winfried and Beck, Heidrun and Schiltenwolf, Marcus and Schneider, Christian and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Personalized treatment suggestions},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {690},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47199},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-471993},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background: The back pain screening tool Risk-Prevention-Index Social (RPI-S) identifies the individual psychosocial risk for low back pain chronification and supports the allocation of patients at risk in additional multidisciplinary treatments. The study objectives were to evaluate (1) the prognostic validity of the RPI-S for a 6-month time frame and (2) the clinical benefit of the RPI-S. Methods: In a multicenter single-blind 3-armed randomized controlled trial, n = 660 persons (age 18-65 years) were randomly assigned to a twelve-week uni- or multidisciplinary exercise intervention or control group. Psychosocial risk was assessed by the RPI-S domain social environment (RPI-SSE) and the outcome pain by the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (baseline M1, 12-weeks M4, 24-weeks M5). Prognostic validity was quantified by the root mean squared error (RMSE) within the control group. The clinical benefit of RPI-SSE was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA in intervention groups. Results: A subsample of n = 274 participants (mean = 38.0 years, SD 13.1) was analyzed, of which 30\% were classified at risk in their psychosocial profile. The half-year prognostic validity was good (RMSE for disability of 9.04 at M4 and of 9.73 at M5; RMSE for pain intensity of 12.45 at M4 and of 14.49 at M5). People at risk showed significantly stronger reduction in pain disability and intensity at M4/M5, if participating in a multidisciplinary exercise treatment. Subjects at no risk showed a smaller reduction in pain disability in both interventions and no group differences for pain intensity. Regarding disability due to pain, around 41\% of the sample would gain an unfitted treatment without the back pain screening. Conclusion: The RPI-SSE prognostic validity demonstrated good applicability and a clinical benefit confirmed by a clear advantage of an individualized treatment possibility.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{vFrankenbergSeidlSchultheissetal.2012,
  author    = {v. Frankenberg, Jenny and Seidl, Rainer Ottis and Schultheiss, Corinna and Frank, Ulrike and Fuß, Sophia and Stefke, Michaela and Honekamp, Andrea and Winkler, Silke and J{\"a}ckel, Annemarie and Schindler, Wencke and Wenglarczyk, Anke and Weise, Stefanie and Heide, Judith and Stadie, Nicole and Schr{\"o}der, Astrid and Baer-Henney, Dinah and van de Vijver, Ruben and Sauerland, Uli and Yatsushiro, Kazuko and Sch{\"o}ppe, Doreen and Blatter, Kristine and Faust, Verena and J{\"a}ger, Dana and Artelt, Cordula and Schneider, Wolfgang and Stanat, Petra and Bruchm{\"u}ller, Wiebke and Sj{\"o}str{\"o}m, Saana and Sch{\"u}tz, Susann and Swietza, Romy and Zielina, Marie and Freymann, Marie and Hausmann, Nadin and K{\"o}ntopp, Isabelle and Liebig, Johanna and Schnell, Annemarie and Wegener, Viktoria and Heinemann, Steffi and Haensel, Diana and M{\"u}rbe, Dirk and Pomnitz, Patricia and Siegm{\"u}ller, Julia},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik = Schwerpunktthema: Schluck f{\"u}r Schluck: Dysphagietherapie bei Kindern und Erwachsenen},
  number    = {5},
  editor    = {Heide, Judith and Fritzsche, Tom and Meyer, Corinna B. and Ott, Susan},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  organization    = {Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V.},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-199-8},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-5866},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-59877},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Das Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Die Jubil{\"a}umsveranstaltung am 19.11.2011 in Potsdam war nicht nur die 5. Auflage der Veranstaltung, sondern auch ein Fest zum 10j{\"a}hrigen Bestehen des Verbandes. Das Thema lautete "Schluck f{\"u}r Schluck: Dysphagietherapie bei Kindern und Erwachsenen". Im vorliegenden Tagungsband finden sich die Artikel der Hauptvortr{\"a}ge sowie die Abstracts der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{IvenHansenAndersetal.2020,
  author    = {Iven, Claudia and Hansen, Bernd and Anders, Kristina and Starke, Andreas and Richardt, Kirsten and Pr{\"u}ß, Holger and El Meskioui, Martina and Haase, Tobias and Mahlberg, Lea and Wiehe, Lea and de Beer, Carola and Niepelt Karampamapa, Rebekka and Hofmann, Andrea and Stadie, Nicole and Hanne, Sandra and Thomson, Jenny and Sch{\"a}fer, Blanca and Huttenlauch, Clara and Wartenburger, Isabell and Weiland, Katharina and Wirsam, Anke and Hartung, Julia and Wahl, Michael and Unger, Julia and Buschmann, Anke and Seefeld, Martin and Bethge, Anita and Fieder, Nora and Rahman, Rasha Abdel and Nousair, Iman and Klassert, Annegret and Wellmann, Caroline and Verbree, Rahel and van Rij, Jacolien and Sprenger, Simone and M{\"a}hl, Anna Luisa and Schneider, Kathleen and Kutz, Anne and Kaps, Hella and Frank, Ulrike and Brekeller, Sophie and Ryll, Katja},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 12. Schwerpunktthema: Weg(e) mit dem Stottern: Therapie und Selbsthilfe f{\"u}r Kinder und Erwachsene},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  number    = {12},
  editor    = {Breitenstein, Sarah and Burmester, Juliane and Yetim, {\"O}zlem and Fritzsche, Tom},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-479-1},
  issn      = {1866-9085},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43700},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-437002},
  pages     = {viii, 257},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Das 12. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema »Weg(e) mit dem Stottern: Therapie und Selbsthilfe f{\"u}r Kinder und Erwachsene« fand am 24.11.2018 in Potsdam statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die Vortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema sowie Beitr{\"a}ge der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis.},
  language  = {de}
}